Advertisement

Evaluation of Quantitative Electron Microprobe Analyses of Multiphase Microcrystalline Refractory Materials

  • David H. Speidel
Conference paper

Abstract

An appropriate test for homogeneity of composition of standards and of unknown samples is an analysis of variance of the intensity ratios of the components within the grains opposed to the variance between the grains under conditions of constant beam current capacitor change. Replication of analyses is necessary to distinguish inherent instrumental variation from actual chemical inhomogeneities present in the samples. This replication permits an estimate of the imprecision caused by inhomogeneities and the statistical variation of X-ray quanta. The total uncertainty of an analysis is the sum of systematic error—primarily reference standard uncertainty—and the imprecision. For multiphase mixtures of microcrystalline refractory oxide material, an uncertainty of ± 2% of the amount of oxide component present in a given phase should be considered a good analysis. This value is based on experimental work in the system MgO-FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2.

Keywords

Electron Microprobe Oxygen Fugacity Oxide Component Refractory Oxide Multiphase Mixture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    “3rd International Symposium on X-Ray Optics and X-Ray Microanalysis”, 1962, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abstracts of the 1964 Fall Meeting, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 2, no. 2, Electrothermics and Metallurgy Division, Electron Probe Techniques“, 1964, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. H. Speidel, Thesis, “Element Distribution Among Coexisting Phases in the System MgO—F2O—Fe2O3—SiO2—TiO2 as a Function of Temperature, Oxygen Fugacity, and Bulk Composition,” 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. H. Speidel and E. F. Osborn, “Element Distribution Among Coexisting Phases in the System MgO—F2O—Fe2O3—SiO2—TiO2 as a Function of Temperature, Oxygen Fugacity, and Bulk Composition,” Geol. Soc. Am., Miami Beach, Florida, November, 1964 (abstract).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Muan and E. F. Osborn, “Phase Equilibria at Liquidus Temperatures in the System MgO—F2O—Fe2O3—SiO2,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 39: 121–140, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Phillips, S. Somiya, and A. Muan, “Melting Relations of Magnesium Oxide—Iron Oxide Mixtures in Air,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44: 167–169, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Arkin and R. R. Colton, Tables for Statisticians, College Outline Series, Barnes and Noble, Inc., New York, 1963, pp. 122–125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • David H. Speidel
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations