Magnetic Susceptibility, Proton NMR and Muon Spin Rotation (μSR) Studies of an Unsupported Platinum Catalyst with Adsorbed H and O

  • R. F. Marzke
  • W. S. Glaunsinger
  • K. B. Rawlings
  • P. Van Rheenen
  • M. Mckelvy
  • J. H. Brewer
  • D. Harshman
  • R. F. Kiefl
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 6)

Abstract

The effects of adsorbed H and O upon the strong intrinsic magnetism exhibited by small particles of platinum have been studied by magnetic susceptibility measurements, proton NMR and muon spin rotation. All work to date has been on very pure samples of an unsupported Pt catalyst prepared by chemical reduction techniques. Dispersions of the samples are in the range.12–.20. The effect of adsorbed H is slight, but O increases the Curie-Weiss susceptibility of the catalysts substantially at low temperatures. H, however, sharply decreases both the spin-lattice relaxation rate of protons in the samples, whose NMR signals are observable at 4.2K, and the transverse field relaxation rate of muons stopped in the samples.

Keywords

Petroleum Platinum Assure Chemisorption Haas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.F. Marzke, W.S. Glaunsinger and M. Bayard, Solid State Commun. 18, 1025 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.M. Wilenzick, D.C. Russel, R.H. Morriss and S.W. Marshall, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 533 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Van Rheenen, M. McKelvy, W.S. Glaunsinger and R.F. Marzke, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 26, 415 (1981). See also P. Van Rheenen, Ph.D. Thesis, Arizona State University, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.J. McKelvy, P. Van Rheenen, W.S. Glaunsinger and R.F. Marzke, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 26, 416 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A. Vannice, J.E. Benson and M. Boudart, J. Catal. 16, 348 (1970). See also reference 3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Sheng and I. Gay, J. Catal. 71, 119 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.C. DeMenorval and J.P. Fraissard, Chem. Phys. Lett. 77, 309 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.T. Stokes, H.E. Rhodes, P. Wang, C.P. Slichter and J. H. Sinfelt in Nuclear and Electron Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science, edited by E.N. Kaufman and G.K. Shenoy ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981 ), p. 253.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.H. Brewer and K.M. Crowe, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 28, 239 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.R. Anderson, Structure of Metallic Catalysts. ( Academic Press, London, 1975 ), p. 296.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.H. Heffner, Hyp. Int. 8, 655 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.A. Mydosh and G.J. Nieuwenhuys in Ferromagnetic Materials, edited by E.B. Wohlfarth ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980 ), p. 167.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. F. Marzke
    • 1
  • W. S. Glaunsinger
    • 1
  • K. B. Rawlings
    • 1
  • P. Van Rheenen
    • 1
  • M. Mckelvy
    • 1
  • J. H. Brewer
    • 2
  • D. Harshman
    • 2
  • R. F. Kiefl
    • 2
  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations