Advertisement

Hydrogen Traps in Cold-Worked Palladium

  • Ted B. Flanagan
  • S. Kishimoto
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 6)

Abstract

The enhancement of a phase H solubility in Pd due to the interaction of dissolved H atoms with the stress fields of dislocations was investigated several years ago by one of the authors and his coworkers (1). This phenomenon has been reinvestigated recently by Kircheim (2,3) using an electrochemical technique which allows the monitoring of much lower H contents than the volumetric technique used in the earlier study (1). Solubility enhancements as great as 106 were reported by Kircheim at the lowest H-contents which could be measured. The solubility enhancement is defined as the ratio r′/r where r′ and r are the H-to-Pd atom ratios for a sample with a large dislocation density and for a well-annealed sample, respectively, where both values of r are measured at the same chemical potential of H. Such large solubility enhancements were not found in the original study (1) which was limited to solubilities in excess of r ≃ 10−3. The solubility enhancements were found to be nearly independent of r for r>10−3; this independence is consistent with the theory of the interaction of the elastic fields of edge dislocations with solute atoms (4). The purpose of the present study is to extend the earlier studies (1) using the volumetric technique to the low H content range where the anomalous solubility was noted by Kircheim (2,3).

Keywords

Edge Dislocation Trapping Site Solubility Curve Hydride Phase Trapping Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    T.B. Flanagan, J.F. Lynch, J.D. Clewley and B. von Turkovich, J. Less Common Metals 49, 13 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    R. Kircheim, Acta Met. 29, 835 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    R. Kircheim, Acta Met. 29, 845 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    J.P. Hirth and B. Carnahan, Acta Met. 26, 1795 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    J.F. Lynch, J.D. Clewley, T. Curran and T.B. Flanagan, J. Less Common Metals 55, 153 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    H.Y. Chang and C.A. Wert, Acta Met. 21, 1233 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    G. Pfeiffer and H. Wipg, J. Phys. F. 6, 167 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    T.B. Flanagan, C.A. Wulff and B.S. Bowerman, J. Solid State Chem. 34, 215 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    T.B. Flanagan, B.S. Bowerman and G.E. Biehl, Scripta Met. 14, 443 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted B. Flanagan
    • 1
  • S. Kishimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations