Interaction of Hydrogen with Substitutional Solute Metals in the ß-Phase of the Palladium-Hydrogen System

  • F. E. Wagner
  • M. Karger
  • F. Pröbst
  • B. Schüttler
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 6)


Mössbauer data obtained with a number of resonances provide information on the local hydrogen distribution around more than a dozen substitutional solute elements in ß-PdHx. From these data and a model for the description of the line positions and intensities in the Mössbauer spectra, one can obtain the interaction energies of Co, Ru, Rh, Sn, Os, Ir, Pt and Au solutes with different nearest neighbor hydrogen configurations. Except for Rh, all these elements clearly repel hydrogen. The energies necessary to bring the first hydrogen atom into the nearest neighborhood of a solute were found to lie between about 20 meV for Ru and at least 150 meV for Au and Sn. For higher numbers of nearest neighbors the repulsive interaction per hydrogen usually becomes weaker, and in some cases the configurations with 5 or 6 nearest neighbors even seem to be energetically favored over those with only 3 or 4.


Hydrogen Concentration Isomer Shift Impurity Element Mossbauer Spectrum Probe Nucleus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. E. Wagner and G. Wortmann, in: “Hydrogen in Metals I”, Top. Appl. Phys. 29, G. Alefeld and J. Völkl,, Springer, Berlin (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Pröbst, F. E. Wagner, M. Karger and G. Wortmann, Z. Phys. Chem. 114:195 (1979); - J. Physique Colloque 40 - C2: 635 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Pröbst, F. E. Wagner and M. Karger, J. Phys. F: Metal Physics 10: 2081 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Karger and F. E. Wagner, Hyperfine Interactions 9: 553 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Karger, F. Pröbst, B. Schüttler and F. E. Wagner, Proceedings of the Miami International Symposium on Metal-Hydrogen Systems, Pergamon Press, Oxford (in print).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    “Mössbauer Isomer Shifts”, G. K. Shenoy and F. E. Wagner, North Holland, Amsterdam (1978).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. N. Greenwood and T. C. Gibb, “Mössbauer Spectroscopy”, Chapman and Hall, London (1971), p. 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Karger, F. E. Wagner, J. Moser, G. Wortmann and L. Iannarella, Hyperfine Interactions 4: 849 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. E. Cranshaw, J. Phys. F: Metal Physics 10: 1323 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. R. Arons, Y. Tamminga and G. de Vries, phys. stat. solidi 40: 107 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. R. Kreitzmann and R. L. Armstrong, contribution to this conference.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. E. Wagner
    • 1
  • M. Karger
    • 1
  • F. Pröbst
    • 1
  • B. Schüttler
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations