NMR Studies of Hydrogen Diffusion in Palladium and ß-LaNi5 Hydrides

  • K. L. Ngai
  • A. K. Rajagopal
  • R. W. Rendell
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 6)


Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques have been employed extensively to study the dynamics of hydrogen diffusion in metal hydrides. The pulsed field gradient (PFG) spin-echo technique has been usedl to deduce the hydrogen diffusion coefficient, D, in transition metals. To overcome difficulties encountered with conventional PFG spin-echo technique in β-LaNi5 hydride, an alternating pulsed field gradient technique2 has also been introduced. Proton spin-lattice relaxation time T1 and the rotating frame, T measurements2–5 have also been used to obtain the correlation time which corresponds to the mean proton diffusion jump time, τD. However, the T1 and T data for many hydrides including LaNi5H7, Hf2RhH2.2, Hf2CoH3.8, PdHx, NbHx, Th4H15 etc. are anomalous and difficult to interpret. The slope on the high temperature side of the T1 or T minimum is always steeper than the slope on the low temperature side. The frequency dependence on the low temperature side is not quadratic and the departure can be large.2–5 The reported attempt frequencies as deduced from T1 and T data for different hydrides differ from each other by orders of magnitude. Several suggestions have been made to explain these anomalous results. These include: (a) two separate activation energies2 governing two types of hydrogen motion which is discarded subsequently4 because it leads to a ω2 dependence; (b) translational diffusion relaxation4 of nuclear spin model of Torrey6 but unfortunately no comparison of Torrey’s model predictions with data has been made; and (c) the reference made by Jones et al.3 and by Chang et al.4 to a recently proposed unified low frequency response model7 for possible explanation; but again no comparisons have been made.


Hydrogen Diffusion Metal Hydride Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study Naval Research Laboratory Pulse Field Gradient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. M. Cotts, in Hydrogen in Metals, ed. G. Alefeld and J. Völkl, Springer-Verlag (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. F. Kalicek and I. J. Lowe, J. Less Common Metals 73: 219 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. C. Jones, T. K. Halstead and K. H. J. Buschow, ibid., 209 (1980).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Chang, I. J. Lowe and R. J. Kalicek, in Nuclear and Electron Resonance Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science, ed. Kaufmann and Shenoy, Elsevier, p. 331 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. K. Halstead, N. A. Aboud and K. H. J. Buschow, Solid State Commun. 19: 425 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. C. Torrey, Phys. Rev. 92: 962 (1953).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. L. Ngai, Comments Solid State Phys. 9: 127, 141 (1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. O. Stejskal and J. E. Tanner, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 288 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. L. Ngai and F. S. Liu, Phys. Rev. B24, 1049 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Teitler, A. K. Rajagopal and K. L. Ngai, Naval Research Laboratory Memo Rept. No. 4757 (1982).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Kruger, Z. Naturf. 24a: 560 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. L. Ngai
    • 1
  • A. K. Rajagopal
    • 2
  • R. W. Rendell
    • 3
  1. 1.Naval Research LaboratoryUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.Sachs/Freeman AssociateNaval Research LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations