Present State and Future Trends in the Development of Programming Languages for Manufacturing

  • U. Rembold
  • W. K. Epple


For the development of programming languages, or in a broader sense, of software tools and languages, a milestone has been reached in two distinct areas, namely factory-information processing and factory automation. Many excellent but specialized tools and languages have been developed to date. The emphasis has been to custom design software for many activities in manufacturing such as production control, factor data collection, material handling and process control.

This paper discusses software for numerical control of machine tools, robots, process control and for conventional data processing purposes. Until to date, the languages and computers for these applications have been developed independently. For this reason it is very difficult to design a homogeneous computer integrated manufacturing system. The future modernization of factories will strongly be influenced by the development of general purpose programming languages and compatible computing systems. Furthermore, the controls of processing equipment have to be made computer compatible. For the factory of the ninetieth, expert systems will be available which perform the majority of all routine tasks.


Machine Tool Programming Language Expert System Tool Path Flexible Manufacturing System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    EXAPT-NC-Programmiersystem, EXAPT-Verein, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Langebartels, “Programmierung von numerisch gesteuerten Werkzeugmaschinen mit den Fertigungstechnisch orientierten Programmiersprachen APT und EXAPT,” VDI-Z, Band III, Nr. 12, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Programmierplatze fur NC-Bearbeitungsprogramme: System P-D/P-F, unich, Germany.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    NC Machining by the Numbers,“ Manufacturing Engineers, May 1979.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Leonards,,W. Muller, F. Otto, and H. Sinning, “Prozeßlenksysteme fur die Drehbearbeitung,” PDV Berichte, Gesellschaft fur Kernforschung mbH Karlsruhe, August 1976.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    U. Rembold, C. Blume, R. Dillmann, and G. Mortel, “Technische Anforderungen an zukunftige Montageroboter,” Part 4, VDI-Zeitschrift, Nr. 21, Nov. 1. 81.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Bonner and G. Kang, “A comparative study of robot languages,” Computer, Dec. 1982.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    The Advent of Adaptable Programmable Assembly Systems,“ Manufacturing Engineering,” April 1979.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. Blume, “VAL - A robot control system of unimation,” University of Karlsruhe, not published, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Mujtaba and R. Goldmann, “AL Users’ Manual,” Stanford University, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. Dillmann, “A graphical emulation system for robot design and program testing,” Conference Proceedings of 13th ISIR/ Robots 7, Chicago, IL, July 1983.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. Epple, M. Hagemann, M. Klump, and G. Koch, “SARS-System zur anwendungsorientierten Anforderungsspezifikation,” Internal Report, University of Karlsruhe, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. W. Alford, “A requirements engineering methodology for real time processing requirements,” IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-3, pp. 69–69, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    I. Motorola, et al., “Challenge for knowledge information processing systems,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, Japan, Oct. 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Rembold
    • 1
  • W. K. Epple
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science IIIUniversity of KarlsruheFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations