Advertisement

The Design of Criteria of Purity For Labeled Compounds

  • Pincus Peyser

Abstract

The ultimate requirement of purity for radiochemicals depends upon the design of the particular experiments in which they are employed. The maximum level of impurities, regardless of their nature, that can be tolerated must be significantly less than the minimum change to be detected. Should they be greater, the labeled compound may still be validly employed, if it can be demonstrated by suitable control experiments that the impurities do not contribute to the observed change.

Keywords

Sodium Citrate Buffer Label Compound Cysteic Acid Uridine Diphosphate Chemical Instability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reagent Chemicals, ACS, Specifications, 1965, American Chemical Society Committee on Analytical Reagents (in press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Specifications and Criteria for Biochemical Compounds, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Publication 719, 1960.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Unpublished data. Chromatography employs Reeve Angel Amberlite Ion Exchange Resin Loaded Paper, SA-2. The paper is washed before use with the developing solvent, sodium citrate buffer, pH 3.7, [Na+]= 0.10 M, and air dried. Chromatography is carried out in a descending fashion for 8 to 15 hr.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beilstein‘s Handbuch der organischen Chemie, Julius Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirs, C. H. W., Moore, S., and Stein, W.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76: 6063 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nemer, M., J. Biol. Chem. 237: 143 (1962).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall, R.H., J. Biol. Chem. 237: 2283 (1962).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strominger, J.L., Maxwell, E.S., and Kalckar, H.M., in Colowick, S.P., and Kaplan, N.O. (editors), Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 6, Academic Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glaser, L., personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dankert, M., Passeron, S., Recondo, E., and Leloir L. F., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 14: 358 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erb, W., and Maurer, W., Biochem. Z. 332: 388 (1960).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fowden, L., Biochem. J. 50: 355 (1951).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moore, S., Spackman, D.H., and Stein, W. H., Anal. Chem. 30: 1185 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cleland, W. W., Biochemistry 3: 480 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Das, H.H., and Roy, S.C., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 62:590 (1962); Greenstein, J.P., and Winitz, M„ Chemistry of the Amino Acids, Vol. 3, John Wiley, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ikawa, M., and Snell, E.E., J. Biol. Chem. 236: 1955 (1961).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Geller, unpublished data.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New England Nuclear Corporation 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pincus Peyser
    • 1
  1. 1.Biochemistry DepartmentNew England Nuclear CorporationBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations