Advertisement

Animal Sonar pp 815-821 | Cite as

Echoes from Solid and Hollow Metallic Spheres

  • Theodorus A. W. M. Lanen
  • Cees Kamminga
Part of the NATO ASI Science book series (NSSA, volume 156)

Summary

A very successful pattern recognition experiment has been carried out with a dolphin identifying a solid sphere versus a hollow one. Results suggest that the dolphin utilized a time difference cue to distinguish between the two spheres. A theoretical evaluation of the physics of the targets, involving a model of the dolphin sonar, has been carried out. The ensonifying signal follows the model of an elementary signal as proposed by Gabor, i.e. a harmonic signal with a Gaussian envelope. The numerical values of the 3 needed parameters are estimated from the sonar recordings of the live experiment. The target modelling of the sphere is done with the quantities inner-to-outer diameter, density of the metal, and longitudinal and transversal wave velocity. A good match between the computational model and the actual experiment shows up.

Keywords

Hollow Sphere Dominant Frequency Solid Sphere Transversal Wave Sphere Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hol, W.A. and C. Kamminga, 1979. “Investigations on Cetacean sonar I. Some results on the threshold detection of hollow and solid spheres performed by the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus”. Aq. Mammals, 7 (12): 41–64.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamminga, C. and A.A.M. v.d. Krogt, 1984. “Time difference perception in bio-sonar from the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin”. Delft Progress Report, 9 (1984): 174–183.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gabor, D., 1946. “Theory of communication”. J. Inst.Elect.Eng., 93: 429–459Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gabor, D., 1947. “Acoustical quanta and the theory of hearing”. Nature, vol. 159: 591–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rudgers, A.J., 1969. “Acoustic pulses scattered by a rigid sphere immersed in a fluid”. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 45, no. 4: 900–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hickling, R., 1964. “Analysis of echoes from a hollow metallic sphere in water”. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 36, no. 6: 1124–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hickling, R., 1962. “Analysis of echoes from a solid elastic sphere in water”. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 34, no. 10: 1582–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackay, R.S., 1966. Discussion on: “The acoustics of small tanks”, in: Marine Bio-Acoustics, vol. 2, W.N. Tavolga, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford: 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodorus A. W. M. Lanen
    • 1
  • Cees Kamminga
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Theory GroupDelft University of TechnologyDelftthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations