Advertisement

Animal Sonar pp 725-752 | Cite as

Some Theoretical Concepts for Echolocation

  • Richard A. Altes
Part of the NATO ASI Science book series (NSSA, volume 156)

Abstract

Some fundamental questions follow from recent developments in animal sonar research and signal processing: (1) What is the meaning of ordered neuronal maps of various echolocation parameters in the context of (a) sampling and interpolation theory, and (b) parameter estimation? (2) What is the impact of recent behavioral experiments upon viable detection models for echolocation? (3) What is the relevance to animal sonar of new time-frequency signal representations?

Keywords

Matched Filter Wigner Distribution Internal Noise Ambiguity Function Wigner Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Suga, “The extent to which biosonar information is represented in the auditory cortex,” in Dynamic Aspects of Neocortical Function, G.M. Edelman, W.E. Gall, and W.M. Cowan, eds., Wiley, New York (1984) 315–373.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Neuweiler, “Auditory processing of echoes: Peripheral processing,” in Animal Sonar Systems, R.-G. Busnel and J.F. Fish, eds., Plenum, New York (1980) 519–548.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Marr, Vision, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco (1982) 41–98.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. de Boor, A Practical Guide to Splines, Springer-Verlag, New York (1978) 39–48.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. de Boor, “Good approximation by splines with variable knots,” in Spline Functions and Approximation Theory, A. Meir and A. Sharma, eds., Birhauser Verlag, Basel (1973) 57–72.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.D. Spaulding and D. Middleton, “Optimum reception in an impulsive interference environment (parts I and II),” IEEE Trans. on Commun. COM-25 (1977) 910–934.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.V. Poor and J.B. Thomas, “Locally optimum detection of discrete-time stochastic signals in non-Gaussian noise,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 63 (1978) 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.S. Kassam and H.V.Poor, “Robust techniques for signal processing: A survey,” Proc. IEEE 73 (1985) 433–481.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.A. Altes, “The Fourier-Mellin transform and mammalian hearing,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 63 (1978) 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I, Wiley, New York (1968) 46–52.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Suga and W.E. O’Neill, “Auditory processing of echoes: Representation of acoustic information from the environment in the bat cerebral cortex,” in Animal Sonar Systems, op. cit., 589–611.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Suga and K. Tsuzuki, “Inhibition and level-tolerant frequency tuning in the auditory cortex of the Mustached bat,” J. Neurophys. 53 (1985) 1109–1145.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.M. Woodward, Probability and Information Theory with Applications to Radar, Pergamon, Oxford (1964).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.E. Cook and M. Bernfeld, Radar Signals, Academic, New York (1967).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Menne and H. Hackbarth, “Accuracy of distance measurement in the bat Eptesicus Fuscus: Theoretical aspects and computer simulations,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 79 (1986) 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.A. Altes, “Texture analysis with spectrograms,” IEEE Trans. on Sonics and Ultrasonics SU-31 (1984) 407–417.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.A. Altes, “Detection, estimation, and classification with spectrograms,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 67 (1980) 1232–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.A. Altes, “Echolocation as seen from the viewpoint of radar/sonar theory,” in Localization and Orientation in Biology and Engineering, D. Varju and H.-U. Schnitzler, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1984) 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Mohl, “Detection by a pipistrelle bat of normal and reversed replica of its sonar pulses,” Acustica 61 (1986) 75–82.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Zakharia, “Sonar evaluation in natural environment,” in Air-borne Animal Sonar Systems, B. Escudie and Y. Biraud, eds., CNRS, Lyon (1985), 14. 1–14. 12.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W.W. Shrader, “MTI Radar,” in Radar Handbook, M.I.Skolnik, ed., McGraw–Hill, New York (1970) 17–1–17–60.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.A. Simmons, “Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar,” Science 204 (1979) 1336–1338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill, NewYork (1975) 348.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.A. Altes and E.L. Titlebaum, “Bat signals as optimally Doppler tolerant waveforms,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 48 (1970) 1014–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.A. Altes, “Sonar for generalized target description and its similarity to animal echolocation systems,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 59 (1976) 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R.A. Altes, “Methods of wideband signal design for radar and sonar systems,” Univ. of Rochester (1970), Nat’l Tech. Info. Service No. AD 732–494.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.A. Altes, “Some invariance properties of the wideband ambiguity function,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 53 (1973) 1154–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    R.A. Altes, “Target position estimation in radar and sonar, and generalized ambiguity analysis for maximum likelihood parameter estimation,” Proc. IEEE 67 (1979) 920–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.F. Fish, C.S. Johnson, and K.K. Ljungblad, “Sonar target discrimination by instrumented human divers,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 59 (1976) 602–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D.M. Green, “Detection of multiple component signals in noise,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 30 (1958) 904–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    B.W. Tansley and J.B. Suffield, “Time course of adaptation and recovery of channels selectively sensitive to frequency and amplitude modulation,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 74 (1983) 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.H. Kay and D.R. Mathews, “On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency modulated tones,” J. Physiol. (London) 225 (1972) 657–667.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.A. Altes, “Spectrograms and generalized spectrograms for classification of random processes,” ICASSP 84 Proceedings, IEEE No. 84CH1945–5, vol 3 (1984) 41 B.8.1–41 B. 8. 4.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R.A. Altes, “Detection and classification phenomena of biological systems,” in Adaptive Methods in Underwater Acoustics, H.G. Urban, ed., D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1985) 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H.-U. Schnitzler, D. Menne, R. Kober, and K. Heblich, “The acoustical image of fluttering insects in echolocating bats,” in Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology, F.Huber and H.Markl, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1983) 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    H.-U. Schnitzler and O.W. Henson, Jr.,“Performance of airborne animal sonar systems: I. Microchiroptera,” in Animal Sonar Systems, op. cit., 154–160.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    G.D. Pollack, “Organizational and encoding features of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats,” in Animal Sonar Systems, op. cit., 549–587.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R.A. Altes, “Possible reconstruction of auditory signals by the central nervous system,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 64 (1978) S137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    N.Y.S. Kiang, D.K. Eddington, and B.Delgutte, “Fundamental considerations in designing auditory implants,” Acta Otolaryngol. 87 (1979) 204–218.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    H. Hackbarth, in preparation.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    G. von Bekesy, Experiments in Hearing, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    R.R. Pfeifer and D.O.Kim. Pfeifer and D.O.Kim, “Cochlear nerve fiber responses: Distribution along the cochlear partition,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 58 (1975) 867–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    E.F. Evans, “Peripheral processing of complex sounds,” in Recognition of Complex Acoustic Signals, T.H. Bullock, ed., Abakon Verlagsgesellschaft (Dahlem Konferenzen), Berlin (1977)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Y. Grenier, “Time-dependent ARMA modeling of nonstationary signals,” IEEE Trans. Acous., Speech, Sig. Proc. ASSP-31 (1983) 899–911. Also: ICASSP 84, op. cit. ref. 33, 41 B.5.1–41 B. 5. 4.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Y. Grenier, “Nonstationary signal modeling with application to bat echolocation calls,” in Air-borne Animal Sonar Systems, op. cit., 19.1–19.35.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    T.A.C.M. Claasen and W.F.G. Mecklenbrauker, “The Wigner distribution - a tool for time-frequency signal analysis, Parts I - III,” Philips J. Res. 35 (1980) 217–250, 276–300, and 372–389.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    P. Flandrin and B. Escudie, “Sur la localisation des representations conjointes dans le plan-temps-frequence,” C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris 295 (1982) 475–478.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    P. Flandrin and B. Escudie, “ An interpretation of the pseudo-Wigner-Ville distribution,” Signal Processing 6 (1984) 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    P. Flandrin, “Some features of time-frequency representations of multicomponent signals,” ICASSP 84, op. cit., 418.4.1–41B. 4. 4.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    W. Martin and P. Flandrin, “Analysis of nonstationary processes: short time periodograms versus a pseudo Wigner estimator,” in Signal Processing II: Theories and Applications, H.W. Schussler, ed., North-Holland, 1983, pp. 455–458.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    T.H. Bullock and S.H. Ridgway, “Evoked potentials in the central auditory system of alert porpoises to their own and artificial sounds,” J. Neurobiology 3 (1972) 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    D.P. Skinner, R.A. Altes, and J.D.Jones. Altes, and J.D.Jones, “Broadband target classification using a bionic sonar, ” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 62 (1977) 1239–1246.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    R.A. Altes, “Overlapping windows and signal representations on the time-frequency plane,” in Air-borne Animal Sonar Systems, op. cit., 17.1–17.47. Also to appear in Acustica.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    T.J. Imig and A. Morel, “Organization of the thalamocortical auditory system in the cat,” Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 6 (1983) 95–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    S. Kay and G.F. Boudreaux-Bartels, “On the optimality of the Wigner distribution for detection,” ICASSP 85 Proceedings, IEEE No. CH2118–8/85 (1985) 1017–1020.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    J.E. Moyal, “Quantum Mechanics as a Statistical Theory,” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45 (1949) 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    D.M. Green and W. A. Yost, “ Binaural Analysis,” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 5, Pt. 2. New York, Springer-Verlag (1975) 462–480.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    R.A. Johnson, “Energy spectrum analysis as a processing mechanism for echolocation,” doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y. (1972).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    R.E. Williams and H.F. Battestin, “Time coherence of acoustic signals transmitted over resolved paths in the deep ocean,” J. Acous. Soc. Am. 59 (1976) 312–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    S.A. Kick and J.A. Simmons, “Automatic gain control in the bat’s sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation,” J. Neurosci. 4 (1984) 2725–2737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    R.A. Altes, “Bioacoustic systems: Insights for acoustical imaging and pattern recognition,” Internat’l Symp. on Pattern Rec. and Acous. Imaging, SPIE 768 (1987) 61–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Altes
    • 1
  1. 1.Chirp CorporationLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations