Animal Sonar pp 265-269 | Cite as

Central Control of Frequency in Biosonar Emissions of the Mustached Bat

  • David M. Gooler
  • William E. O’Neill
Part of the NATO ASI Science book series (NSSA, volume 156)


Doppler-compensating, echolocating bats like the mustached bat (Pteronotus p. parnellii) present excellent models for studying how sensory feedback controls subsequent motor behavior, i.e., how auditory feedback may regulate vocalization. The mustached bat emits stereotyped orientation sounds consisting of a brief rising frequency modulation (FM) followed by a long constant frequency (CF) component and ending in a short downward sweeping FM. Doppler-shifts of the echo frequency result from the difference in the bat’s velocity with respect to its surroundings. During “Doppler-shift compensation ” (DSC), these bats actively compensate for Doppler-shifts in the echo by offsetting the frequency of the orientation sound in order to stabilize the echo at the “reference frequency” (about 100–150 Hz higher than the “resting frequency” emitted when the bat detects no Doppler-shift; Schnitzler, 1968, 1970). The variability in the CF frequency emitted during DSC as observed during obstacle avoidance tests is typically ±10 to ±110 Hz (Jen and Kamada, 1982). The precision with which mustached bats control the frequency of their emitted sounds, and consequently echo frequency, is regulated directly by feedback of information from echoes. The aims of this study were to define central vocal control regions, clarify their role in the production of echolocation sounds, and investigate the role of auditory processing in the control of vocal frequency.


Echolocation Pulse Natural Vocalization Echolocation Sound Constant Frequency Component Orientation Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Jen, P.H.-J., and Kamada, T., 1982, Analysis of orientation signals emitted by the CF-FM bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii and the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus during avoidance of moving and stationary obstacles, J. Comp. Physiol, 148: 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Schnitzler, H.-U., 1968, Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermause (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen, Z. vergl. Physiol, 5 7: 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Schnitzler, H.-U., 1970, Echoortung bei der Fledermaus Chilonycteris rubiginosa, Z. vergl. Physiol, 68: 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Suga, N., Schlegel, P., Shimozawa, T., and Simmons, J.A., 1973, Orientation sounds evoked from echolocating bats by electrical stimulation of the brain, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer, 54: 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Suga, N., Simmons, J.A., and Shimozawa, T., 1974, Neurophysiological studies on echolocation systems in awake bats producing CF-FM orientation sounds, J. Exp. Biol, 61: 379.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Gooler
    • 1
  • William E. O’Neill
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Brain ResearchUniversity of Rochester School of MedicineRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations