Advertisement

Densification and Electrical Resistance of Y2O3 at Various Pressures

  • F. W. Vahldiek

Abstract

The densification of Y2O3 has been previously reported by various investigators [1–4]. Schieitz and Wilder [1] studied the sintering of Y2O3 from 1210 to 1643°C in a vacuum furnace, with difficulties encountered in its complete densification and interpretation of the sintering data in terms of sintering models based on volume and grain boundary diffusion. Jorgensen and Anderson [2] showed that the addition of up to 10 m% ThO2 to Y2O3 inhibits grain growth during sintering, and allows the sintering process to proceed to essentially theoretical density of the specimens. These investigators [2] were unable to obtain theoretical density of the pure Y2O3 specimens heated to 2000°C in a resistance furnace. Transparent Y2O3 was reported by Lefever and Matsko [3] using vacuum hot pressing at 950°C and pressures up to 830 bars. Füll transparency was achieved according to these investigators [3] by adding LiF to Y2O3. Dutta and Gazza [4] used vacuum hot pressing at temperatures ranging from 1300 to 1500°C and pressures up to 480 bars to produce transparent Y2O3 specimens. The present work was undertaken in order to determine the densification of Y2O3 with or without ThO2 additions using vacuum sintering, regulär hot pressing, and high pressure hot pressing techniques.

Keywords

Theoretical Density Vacuum Sinter Complete Densification Resistance Vacuum Electron Microprobe Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. D. Schieitz and D. R. Wilder, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 50, 439 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. J. Jorgensen and R. C. Anderson, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 50, 553 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. Le fever and J. Matsko, Mat. Res. Bull. 2, 865 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. K. Dutta and G. E. Gazza, Mat. Res. Bull. 4, 791 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. W. Vahldiek, J. Less-Common Met. 13, 530 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. C. Kennedy and P. N. Lamori, in Progress in Very High Pressure Research, F. P. Bundy, W. R. Hibbard and H. M. Strong, eds., John Wiley and Sons, New York (1961).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. W. Vahldiek, J. Less-Common Met. 11, 99 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. W. Vahldiek, J. Less-Common Met. 14, 133 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. N. Blumenthal and J. E. Laubach, in Anisotropy in Single- Crystal Refractory Compounds, Vol. 2, F. W. Vahldiek and S. A. Mersol, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. E. Curtis, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 40, 274 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. L. Anderson and N. Soga, AF Tech. Rpt. AFML TR 65–202 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. R. Manning, O. Hunter, and B. R. Powell, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52, 436 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. W. Vahldiek
    • 1
  1. 1.Air Force Materials LaboratoryWright-Patterson Air Force BaseUSA

Personalised recommendations