Advertisement

A Schematic Representation of the Designers’ Logic

  • O. Akin
  • C.-C. Chen
  • B. Dave
  • S. Pithavadian

Abstract

The aim of our research is to develop an operational model of the behavior of designers in the domain of architecture. We hope to account for the designers’ behavior in terms of two major functionalities: Problem Structuring- establishing and transforming the parameters of the design problem; and Problem Solving- seeking a solution based on the known parameters of the design problem. In this paper, we present a formal paradigm of the designers’ behavior that is based on protocol experiments. First, the protocol experiments are briefly described and analyzed. Next, the paradigm that we have developed based on the protocol data is presented. The paradigm is elaborated in distinct categories of representation to reflect the diverse nature of knowledge employed by human designers in the architectural design problems. This is followed by a brief description of a computer program under development that we hope will operationally demonstrate the efficacy of our paradigm.

Keywords

Design Solution Spatial Unit Design Unit Access Requirement Adjacency Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akin, O., Exploration of the Design Process, Design Methods and Theories, 13(3/4):115 119, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akin.O., Psychology of Architectural Design, Pion, London, (in print).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eastman, C., On the Analysis of Intuitive Design Processes, in Moore, G. (ed.), Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foz, A., Observations on Designer Behavior in the Parti, DMS DRS Journal: Design Research & Methods, 7(4):320 323, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newell, A. and Simon, H., Human Pioblem Solving, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simon, H., Style in Design, in Archea, J. and Eastman, C. (eds.), EDRA II: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Environmental Design Research Conference. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg PA, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon, H., “Structure of III Structured Problems”, Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4):181–201, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hermes Publishing 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Akin
    • 1
  • C.-C. Chen
    • 1
  • B. Dave
    • 1
  • S. Pithavadian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureCarnegie-Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations