Development of the Integrated Construction Automation Methodology

  • A. H. Slocum


Current research In construction automation Is focusing on automating Individual processes Instead of approaching the problem from a hierarchical systems viewpoint; thus many systems being studied treat the construction site as a “hostile” environment and Incorporate many sensors to extract Information from the building. As a result, sensor and signal processing technology can be a limiting factor In the design of machines to automate building processes. However, If Integration and automation of the construction process are approached from a systems view, then existing technology can be used to design economical machines to automate many construction processes, and to coordinate and Integrate their use within the construction environment. A new design methodology, the Integrated Construction Automation Methodology (ICAM), Is presented here to assist in achieving high levels of integration and automation using existing technology.


Expert System Construction Process Central Controller Building System Machine Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    F. Moavenzadeh, “Construction’s High-Technology Revolution”, Technology Review. Vol. 88, No. 7 (Oct. 1985) pp 32–41.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Kassler, “Robots and Mining: The Implications for Australian Industry In the 1980’s”, Robot lea. Vol. 3 1985 pp 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.F. Engleberger, “Robotics 1989”, Robotics Today, Dec. 1984, pp 57–59.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.R. Schreiber, “Robotics Research: The Next Five Years and Beyond”, Robotics Today, Dec. 1984, pp 54–55.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B.C. Boyd, “Automation and Robotics for Construction”, Joul. Of Construction Engineering and Management. Sept. 1985, Vol. 111, No. 3, pp 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Warszawskl, D. Sangrey, “Robotics In Building Construct Ion”, Jou. of Construction Engineering and Management. Sept. 1985, Vol. 111, No. 3, pp 260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Suzuki, “The View From Japan of Future Building Programs”, Advlsory Board on the Bullt Enviroment 1983–1984, National Research Council, pp 13–27Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R.R. Schreiber, “The U.S. Robot Industry”, Robotics Today. Oct. 1985, pp 35–42.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.R. Schreiber, “Robotics Unlimited: Reaching Beyond the Factory”, Robot les Today. Dec. 1984, pp 43–47.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P.H. Winston, Artificial Intellloence. Addison Wesley Publ. 1984.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P.T. Rayson, “A Review of Expert Systems Principles and Their Role In Manufacturing Systems”, Robotlca, Vol. 3 Part 4, Oct-Dec 1985, pp 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.S. Albus et-al, “Hierarchical Control for Robots In an Automated Factory”, 13th ISIR/ Robots Symposium. Chicago III. April 1983.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J.A. Simpson et-al, “The Automated Manufacturing Research Facility at the National Bureau of Standards”, Jou. Manufacturing Systems, 1982 Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Report from The1984 Workshop on Advanced Technology for Building peslgn and Engineering. Bldg. Res. Board, Nat. Res. Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hermes Publishing 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. Slocum
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations