Skip to main content

Is Salt Restriction Necessary to Reduce the Risk of Stone Formation?

  • Conference paper
Urolithiasis and Related Clinical Research

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated a close association between idiopathic hypercalciuria and upper urinary tract stone disease. The cause of the hypercalciuria is not totally understood, but it is well known that the tubular reabsorption of sodium and calcium are closely related1. Studies in animals and man suggest that dietary and urinary sodium may influence urinary calcium excretion2,3. Except for a few isolated reports, however, there is little information on the role of dietary sodium in idiopathic hypercalciuria. We have examined the relationship between urinary sodium and calcium in a group of stone formers and investigated the effect of dietary sodium restriction in those who were hypercalciuric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. A. L. Sutton, and J. H. Dirks, in: “The Kidney”, B. M. Brenner and F. C. Rector, eds., W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. R. Kleeman, J. Bohannan, D. Bernstein, S. Ling, and M. H. Maxwell, Proc. Soc. Ex. Biol. Med. 115:29 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Walser, Am. J. Physiol. 200:1099 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. H. Flocks, J. Am. Mech. Assoc. 113:1466 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Albright, P. Henneman, P. H. Benedict, and A. P. Forbes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 46:1077 (1953).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Thom, J. E. Morris, A. Bishop, and N. J. Blacklock, Br. J. Urol. 50:459 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. G. Robertson, M. Peacock, P. J. Heyburn, F. A. Hanes, A. Rutherford, E. Clementson, R. Swaminathan, P. B. Clark, Br. J. Urol. 51:427 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. N. Rao, C. Gordon, C. Davies, and N. J. Blacklock, Br. J.Urol. 54:575 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. P. Muldowney, Kidney Int. 16:637 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. A. L. Sutton and V. R. Walker, in: “Urolithiasis: Clinical and Basic Research”, L. H. Smith, W. G. Robertson and B. Finlayson, eds., Plenum, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rao, P.N., Faraghar, E.B., Buxton, A., Prendiville, V., Blacklock, N.J. (1985). Is Salt Restriction Necessary to Reduce the Risk of Stone Formation?. In: Schwille, P.O., Smith, L.H., Robertson, W.G., Vahlensieck, W. (eds) Urolithiasis and Related Clinical Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7272-1_91

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7272-1_91

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7274-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7272-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics