The Bound State Problem in QED-Taming the Bethe-Salpeter Equation

  • D. R. Yennie
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 61)


The theory of bound states in quantum electrodynamics is described, with particular emphasis on the formulation of the problem of treating recoil corrections.


Dirac Equation Coulomb Potential Hyperfine Structure Lamb Shift Coulomb Gauge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T. Kinoshita, Proc. 19th Intern. Conf. High Energy Physics, 571 (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.R. Lundeen and F.M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 ,1368 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.S. Andrews and G. Newton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1254 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.W. Erickson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 780 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.W. Mohr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1050 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Hellwig, R.F.C. Vessot, M.W. Levine, P.W. Zitzewitz, D.W. Allan, and D.J. Glazer, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1M-19, 200 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6a.
    L. Essen, R.W. Donaldson, M.J. Bangham, and E.G. Hope, Nature 229. 110 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6b.
    M.J. Bangham and R.W. Donaldson, National Physical Laboratory Report Qu 17 (March 1971).Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    D.E. Casperson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 956, 1504 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    G.T. Bodwin, D.R. Yennie, and M.A. Gregorio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 ,1088 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8a.
    W.E. Caswell and G.P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1092 (1978). The numerical value does not take into account some very recent changes in the experimental parameters used.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    P.O. Egan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54A, 412 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 9a.
    A.P. Mills, Jr. and G.H. Bearman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 246 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 10.
    P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. A16, 863 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 10a.
    G.T. Bodwin and D.R. Yennie, Phys. Reports 43, 267 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 11.
    H.M. Fried and D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. 112, 1391 (1958).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 12.
    E.E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. 87, 328 (1952).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 13.
    F. Gross, Phys. Rev. 186, 1448 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 14.
    H. Grotch and D.R. Yennie, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 350 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Yennie
    • 1
  1. 1.Newman Laboratory of Nuclear StudiesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations