Future Trends in Nuclear Materials

  • J. T. Adrian Roberts
Part of the Modern Perspectives in Energy book series (MOAC)


A nuclear power plant is clearly a demanding proving ground of a maerial’s resilience. Materials possess a memory and damage is cumulative. Abuse early in life is rarely annealed out; even if it is, the accompanying microstructural changes are rarely acceptable for long lifetimes. Thus, for application in a hostile environment, and there is probably none more demanding than that of a nuclear reactor, materials must be fabricated with care, components must be constructed with care, and systems must be operated with care. These requirements place great demands on all concerned, from the forgemaster to the reactor operator. The reliability and safety record of the nuclear industry shows that this challenge is being met, but, with the increasing need to extract more energy from available systems, further improvements are called for.


Titanium Alloy Austenitic Stainless Steel Steam Generator Nuclear Material Ferritic Stainless Steel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. P. Hirth and A. H. Clauer, Concluding Agenda Discussion-Critical Issues, in: Fundamental Aspects of Structural Alloy Design ,R. I. Jaffee and B. A. Wilcox, eds., Batteile Institute Materials Science Colloquium, Plenum Press, New York (1975), pp. 647–661.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Wahlster and R. Schumann, A Contribution to the Electroslag Remelting of Large Forging Ingots, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Electroslag Remelting Processes ,Tokyo, Japan, 1973, Japan Iron and Steel Institute.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. I. Jaffee, Metallurgical Problems and Opportunities in Coal-Fired Steam Power Plants, Metall. Trans. A ,10, 139–164 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. L. VerSnyder and M. Gill, New Directions in Alloy Design for Gas Turbines, in: Fundamental Aspects of Structural Alloy Design ,R. I. Jaffee and B. A. Wilcox, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1975), pp. 290–227.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. H. Jones, B. R. Leonard, Jr., and A. B. Johnson, Jr., An Assessment of Titanium Alloys for Fusion Reactor First-Wall and Blanket Applications, Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI-RP 1045–3, project final report (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. G. Hickman, Tritium-Related Materials Problems in Fusion Reactors, in: Critical Materials Problems in Energy Production, Charles Stein, ed., Academic Press, New York (1976), pp. 189–220.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. L. Jones, T. U. Marston, S. T. Oldberg, and K. E. Stahlkopf, Pressure Boundary Technology Program: Progress 1974 through 1978, Electric Power Research Institute, NP 1103-SR (March, 1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. J. Povich and R. E. Smith, An Overview of Intergranular Stress-Corrosion Cracking in Light Water Reactors, paper presented at American Power Conference, April 1979, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. F. Whalen and A. N. Mucciardi, Pressure Vessel Nozzle Inspection Using Adaptive Learning Techniques, presented at the First International Seminar on Nondestructive Examination in Relation to Structural Integrity, 5th SMIRT Conference, West Berlin, August 1979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. E. Gelhaus, D. L. Pomeroy, and M. T. Pitek, Impact of Fuel Damage on Nuclear Power Plant Operations, invited paper, American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. T. Adrian Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Electric Power Research InstitutePalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations