Advertisement

Safer Pesticide Packaging and Formulations for Agricultural and Residential Applications

  • James D. Bailey
Part of the Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology book series (RECT, volume 129)

Abstract

Over the years, the goal of the formulation and packaging efforts at agricultural chemical companies has been to provide a product that maximizes the ability of the active ingredient to control a target pest in a safe, reliable, and cost-effective manner. The function of pesticide formulation and packaging today is changing rapidly in response to a wide range of factors now impacting the agricultural chemical industry. In addition to improving product performance, research chemists and engineers are developing a new generation of delivery systems that address a number of issues central to the business of agricultural chemicals, namely, minimizing user exposure, protecting the environment, and dealing with the problems of container disposal.

Keywords

Environmental Protection Agency Agricultural Chemical Empty Container National Fire Protection Association Inert Ingredient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aeroquip Corporation (1991) Closed dispensing system field trial manual. Nashville, TN, pp 1–26.Google Scholar
  2. Crosby D, Minyard J (1991) The persistent seventies. In: Marco G, Hollingworth R, and Plimmer J (eds) Regulation of agrochemicals—a driving force in their evolution, 1st ed. ACS, Washington, DC. pp 9–17.Google Scholar
  3. Cross B (1991) Trends in agrochemicals formulations. In: Marco G, Hollingworth R, and Plimmer J (eds) Regulation of agrochemicals—a driving force in their evolution, 1st ed. ACS, Washington, DC. pp 89–100.Google Scholar
  4. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1989) Inert ingredients in pesticide products; policy statements; revisions and modification of lists. In: Fed Regi 54 ( 224 ). Washington, DC. pp 48314–48316.Google Scholar
  5. EPA (1991) Executive summary for Draft 40, CFR Part 165. Off of Pesticide Management and Disposal, Washington, DC. pp 4–5.Google Scholar
  6. Fitz N (1992) Management of pesticide containers. In: Proc Nat Symp on Pesticide and Fertilizer Containment: Design and Management, Kansas City, MO. pp 107113.Google Scholar
  7. McLeod D, Bailey J, Wichman K, Thix A (1990) The small volume returnable: A solution to the standardization of liquid pesticide containers. In: Frehse H, Kesseler-Schmitz E, and Conway S (eds) Book of abstracts, 7th Internat Cong of Pesticide Chemistry, Hamburg, Germany. Vol II, p 102.Google Scholar
  8. NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) (1990) Flammable and combustible liquids code. Quincy, MA. p 31.Google Scholar
  9. RTI (Research Triangle Institute) (1989) Rept Ad-Hoc Pesticide Container Meeting. Arlington, VA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Bailey
    • 1
  1. 1.DowElancoFormulation Science & Technology LaboratoryIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations