Two of the most important ionic mercury compounds are mercury (II) chloride, also known as mercuric bichloride and mercury perchloride, and mercury (II) sulfate, which is sometimes called mercuric sulfate. This advisory is primarily concerned with the toxic effects of such ionic compounds, but it is metallic mercury that has the most uses. Metallic mercury is used as a cathode in the electrolytic preparation of chlorine and caustic soda; it is also used in electrical apparatuses, dental amalgams, and catalysts, and in pulp and paper manufacture. The properties of mercury, mercury (II) chloride, and mercury (II) sulfate are given in Tables 1, 2, and 3, respectively.


Mercuric Chloride Inorganic Mercury Dental Amalgam Organic Mercury Mercuric Acetate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andres P (1984) IgA-IgG disease in the intestine of Brown Norway rats ingesting mercuric chloride. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 30 488–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernaudin JF, Druet E, Druet P, Masse R (1981) Inhalation or ingestion of organic or inorganic mercurials produces auto-immune disease in rats. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 20: 129–13 5.Google Scholar
  3. Clarkson, TW (1972) The pharmacology of mercury compounds. Ann Rev Pharmacol 12: 375–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Druet P, Druet E, Potdevin F, Sapin C (1978) Immune type of glomerulonephritis induced by HgCl2 in the brown Norway rat. Ann Immunol 129C: 777–792.Google Scholar
  5. Ebersole G, O’Connor JT (1972) The removal of mercury from water by conventional water treatment processes. Presented at 92nd annual conference, American Waterworks Association, Chicago, IL, June.Google Scholar
  6. Fitzhugh OG, Nelson A, Laug E, Junze F (1950) Chronic oral toxicants of mercuric-phenyl and mercuric salts. Arch Ind Occup Med 2: 433–442.Google Scholar
  7. Gale TF (1974) Embryopathic effects of different routes of administration of mercuric acetate in the hamster. Environ Res 8: 207–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleason MN, Gosselin RE, Hodge HC (1957) Clinical toxicology of commercial products. Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore, MD, p 154.Google Scholar
  9. Jugo S (1976) Retention and distribution of 203HgC12 in suckling and adult rats. Hlth Physics 30: 240–241.Google Scholar
  10. Lehman AJ (1959) Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, drugs, and cosmetics. Q Bull Assoc Food Drug Offic US.Google Scholar
  11. Logsdon GS, Symons JM (1973) Mercury removal by conventional water treatment techniques. J Am Waterworks Assoc 65 (8): 554–562.Google Scholar
  12. Pesce AJ, Hanenson I, Sethi K (1977) B2 microglobulinuria in a patient with nephro toxicity secondary to mercuric chloride ingestion. Clin Toxicol 11(3): 309–315.Google Scholar
  13. Rahola T, Hattula T, Korlainen A, Miettinen JK (1971) The biological halftime of inorganic mercury (Hg2+) in man. Scand J Clin Invest 27 (Suppl. 116): 77.Google Scholar
  14. Rothstein A, Hayes AD (1960) The metabolism of mercury in the rat studied by isotope techniques. J Pharmacol 130: 166–176.Google Scholar
  15. Seiler HG, Sigel H, Sigel A (eds) (1988) Handbook on the toxicity of inorganic compounds. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Sigworth ES, Smith SB (1972) Adsorption of inorganic compounds by activated carbon. J Am Waterworks Assoc 64 (6): 386–391.Google Scholar
  17. Sorg TJ (1977) Manual of treatment techniques for meeting the interim primary drinking water standards. USEPA Report no. EPA–600/8–77–005a. USEPA Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Sorg TJ (1979) Treatment technology to meet the interim primary drinking water regulations for organics: Part 4. J Am Waterworks Assoc 71: 454–466.Google Scholar
  19. Task Group on Metal Accumulation (1973) Accumulation of toxic metals with special reference to their absorption, excretion and biological halftimes. Environ Phys Biochem 3: 65–67.Google Scholar
  20. Theim L, Badorek D, O’Connor JT (1976) Removal of mercury from drinking water using activated carbon. J Am Waterworks Assoc. 68: 447–451.Google Scholar
  21. USEPAa (1973) Water quality criteria, 1972. Ecol Res Ser Rep of Water Quality Criteria. Report no. EPA-R3/73/033. USEPA Office of Water Regulation and Standards (OWRS), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. USEPAa (1979a) Method 245.1. Manual cold vapor technique. In: Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. Report no. EPA–600/4–79–020. USEPA Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. USEPAa (1979b) Method 245.2. Automated cold vapor technique. In: Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. Report no. EPA–600/4–79–020. USEPA Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. USEPAa (1980) Ambient water quality criteria for mercury. Report no. EPA–440/ 5–80–05b.Google Scholar
  25. USEPAa Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC. USEPA (1985) Drinking water criteria document for mercury (draft report). USEPA Office of Drinking Water (ODW), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. USEPA (1986) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Fed Regis 51(185):3399234003. September 24.Google Scholar
  27. USEPAa(1987) Estimated national occurrence and exposure to mercury in public drinking water supplies. Criteria and Standards Division, USEPA Office of Drinking Water (ODW), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Weast RC (ed) (1971) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 52nd Ed. The Chemical Rubber Co, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
  29. WHO (1971) World Health Organization. International standards for drinking water. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • George W. Ware
    • 1
  1. 1.College of AgricultureUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations