Advertisement

Analysis of Massive Sulfides within the Mountain View Area of the Stillwater Complex, Montana — a Statistical Formulation and Test of the Sulfide Liquid Immiscibility Model

  • W. J. Bawiec
  • J. H. Schuenemeyer
  • L. J. Drew
Part of the Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences book series (CAES)

Abstract

The Stillwater Complex, Montana, is a layered mafic intrusion containing resources of chromite, platinum, copper, and nickel. The exploration program for copper and nickel sulfides within the Mountain View area of this igneous body included a series of diamond drillholes located on a grid. Characteristics of massive sulfides which occur in these drillholes (thickness, stratigraphic position, and copper-nickel grades) within and adjacent to the Basal series of the Stillwater Complex have been analyzed and compared with theoretically expected results of immiscible sulfide liquids. An important aspect of this study is the translation of the attributes of a geologic model into statistical hypotheses to evaluate the possibility that liquid immiscibility is the primary process responsible for the thickness, stratigraphic distribution, and copper-nickel grade characteristics of the massive sulfides present within the Mountain View area of the Stillwater Complex.

Geologic models have been proposed on the interrelation between sulfide mineralization and silicate rocks in layered intrusions, mechanisms for separation of immiscible sulfide liquids from basaltic magmas, methods of collection and concentration of immiscible sulfide liquids, and the crystallization of the collected sulfide liquid. The combination of these processes in conjunction with the geologic history of the area leads to expected results concerning the distribution and grade of the massive sulfides contained within layered mafic igneous rocks and the associated metasedimentary rock.

The results of formulating and testing nine statistical hypotheses led to the conclusions that there is no evidence to reject the model wherein sulfide liquid immiscibility is the primary condition responsible for the distribution and grade characteristics of the massive sulfides, and no evidence to reject the hypotheses that the copper and nickel grades of the massive sulfides in the Basal series are not different significantly than those in the metasedimentary rock. Other results of the analysis show that the copper and nickel grades of the massive sulfides are not related to their thickness in either the Basal series or the metasedimentary rock; that no trend in thickness of the massive sulfides was determined as a function of stratigraphic position in either the Basal series or the metasedimentary rock; that frequency in the occurrence of massive sulfides declines as a function of distance from the Basal series and metasedimentary rock contact; and that the total volume of sulfide increases as the depth increases in the Basal series and decreases as distance from the top of the metasedimentary rocks increases.

Keywords

Massive Sulfide Metasedimentary Rock Basal Series Nickel Sulfide Sulfide Liquid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, P.B., Jr., 1970, Sulfide petrology: Mineral. Soc. America Spec. Paper 3, p. 187-198.Google Scholar
  2. Bawiec, W.J., 1985, Computer applications to structural interpretation and metal distribution within the Basal series of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: EOS, v. 66, no. 18, p. 398–399.Google Scholar
  3. Bawiec, W.J., and Drew, L. J., 1984, Basal zone of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: Internal stratigraphy and morphology from copper and nickel assay values (abst.): Geol. Soc. America, Reno, NV, Nov., 1984, p. 508.Google Scholar
  4. Cowan, J.C., 1968, The geology of the Strathcona ore deposit: Canadian Mining and Metall. Bull., v. 1, no. 669, p. 38–54.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, J.R., and Kullerud, G., 1969, Phase relations in the Cu-Fe-Ni-S system and their application to magmatic ore deposits, in Wilson, H.D.B., ed., Magmatic ore deposits: Econ. Geology Mon. 4, p. 344-358.Google Scholar
  6. Drew, L.J., Bawiec, W.J., and Page, N.J. 1983, The copper-nickel assay log: A tool for stratigraphic interpretation within the Basal zone of the Stillwater Complex (abst.): EOS, v. 64, no. 45, p. 884.Google Scholar
  7. Drew, L.J., Bawiec, W.J., Page, N.J., and Schuenemeyer, J.H., 1985, The copper-nickel concentration log: A tool for stratigraphic interpretation within the Ultramafic and Basal zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: Jour. Geochem. Expl., v. 23, no. 2 p. 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Genkin, A.D., Eustigheeva, T.L., and Kovalenker, V.A., 1980, Platinum group minerals of copper-nickel ores and some aspects of their origin: Proc. 11th Intern. Mineralog. Assoc. Congress (Novosibirsk), p. 165-171.Google Scholar
  9. Haughton, D.R., Roeder, P.L., and Skinner, B.J., 1974, Solubility of sulfur in mafic magmas: Econ. Geology, v. 69, no. 4, p. 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawley, J.E., 1962, The Sudbury ores — their mineralogy and origin: Can. Mineralogist, v. 7, pt. 1, p. 1–207.Google Scholar
  11. Hawley, J.E., 1965, Upside-down zoning at Frood, Sudbury, Ontario: Econ. Geology, v. 60, no. 3, p. 529–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hess, H.H., 1960, Stillwater igneous complex, Montana — a quantitative mineralogical study: Geol. Soc. America Mem. 80, 230 p.Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, E.E., 1961, Primary textures and mineral association in the ultramafic zone of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 358, p. 1-106.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, W.R., Peoples, J.W., and Howland, A.L., 1960, Igneous and tectonic structures of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1071-H, p. 281-340.Google Scholar
  15. McCallum, I.S., Raedeke, L.D., and Mathez, E.A., 1980, Investigations of the Stillwater Complex: Part I. Stratigraphy and structure of the Banded zone: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 280-A, pt. 1, p. 59–87.Google Scholar
  16. Naldrett, A.J., 1981, Nickel sulfide deposits: Classification, composition, and genesis: Econ. Geology 75th Ann. Vol., p. 628-685.Google Scholar
  17. Page, N.J., and Nokelberg, W.J., 1974, Geologic map of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map 1-797, 5 sheets, scale 1:12,000.Google Scholar
  18. Page, N.J., 1977, Stillwater Complex, Montana — rock succession, metamorphism, structure of the complex and adjacent rocks: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 999, 79 p.Google Scholar
  19. Page, N. J. 1979, Stillwater Complex, Montana — structure, mineralogy, and petrology of the Basal zone with emphasis on the occurrence of sulfides; U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1038, p. 1-69.Google Scholar
  20. Page, N.J. Zientek, M.L., Czamanske, G.K., and Foose, M.P., 1985, Sulfide mineralization in the Stillwater Complex and underlying rocks, in Czamanske, G.K., and Zientek, M.L., eds., Stillwater Complex, Montana: Geology and guide, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Spec. Publ. 92, p. 93-96.Google Scholar
  21. Segerstrom, K., and Carlson, R.R., 1982, Geologic map of the Banded zone of the Stillwater Complex and adjacent rocks, Stillwater, Sweetgrass, and Park Counties, Montana: U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Invest. Series Map-I-1383, 2 sheets, 1:24,000.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, B.J., and Peck, D.L., 1969, An immiscible sulfide melt from Hawaii, in Wilson, H.D.B., ed., Magmatic ore deposits: Econ. Geology Mon. 4, p. 310-322.Google Scholar
  23. Todd, S.G., Keith, D.W., LeRoy, L.W., Schissel, D.J., Mann, E.L., and Irvine, T.N., 1982, The J-M platinum-palladium reef of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: I. Stratigraphy and petrology: Econ. Geology, v. 77, no. 6, p. 1454–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zientek, M.L., 1983, Petxogenesis of the Basal zone of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Stanford Univ., 229 p.Google Scholar
  25. Zientek, M.L., 1985, Czamanske, G.K., and Irvine, T.N., 1985, Stratigraphy and nomenclature for the Stillwater Complex, in Czamanske, G.K. and Zientek, M.L., eds., Stillwater Complex, Montana: Geology and guide, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Spec. Publ. 92, p. 21-32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. Bawiec
    • 1
  • J. H. Schuenemeyer
    • 2
  • L. J. Drew
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyUSA
  2. 2.University of DelawareUSA

Personalised recommendations