A Study of Two-Dimensional Grain Sequences in Rocks

  • Andrea G. Fabbri
  • Ralph Kretz
Part of the Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences book series (CAES)


The visual aspect of crystalline fabrics in thin or polished sections under the microscope is captured by digitizing the outlines of all recognizable grain profiles (from 250 to 2500) over areas of 3 to 6 cm2. Digital image processing of the textural data obtained is applied to extract quantitative aspects not detected readily by human vision such as the frequency distribution of contacts between grains belonging to the same or to different phases. The methods described are of importance when a model of crystallization can be expressed in terms of geometrical relationships between grains. Furthermore, such relationships correspond to physical characteristics of a rock.

This contribution reviews recent work in texture analysis and proposes some new techniques in which computer processing and petrology are useful mutually for quantitative measurement and recognition. Examples of applications to metamorphic rocks and intrusive rocks are described in which image processing leads to the following results: (a) the probability of a grain to be surrounded by other grains, (b) the mapping of particular grain sequences, and (c) the identification and statistical analysis of individual grain contacts.


Metamorphic Rock Binary Image Textural Data Markov Random Field MarkOvian Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahuja, N., Dubitzki, T., and Rosenfeld, A., 1980, Some experiments with mosaic models for images: I.E.E.E. Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, v. SCM-10, p. 744–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung, C.F., Fabbri, A.G., Kasvand, T., and Otsu, N., 1984, Grain contiguity and inference on permeability of granites: Proc. ICAM84, Intern. Congress on Applied Mineralogy in the Mineral Industry, Los Angeles, California, p. 223-244.Google Scholar
  3. Cross, G.R., and Jain, A.K., 1983, Markov random field texture models: I.E.E.E. Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, v. PAMI-5, p. 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ehrlich, R., Vogel, T.A., Weinberg, B., Kamilli, D.C., Byerly, G., and Richter, H., 1972, Textural variations in petrogenetic analyses: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 83, no. 3, p. 665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fabbri, A.G., 1984, Image processing of geological data: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 244p.Google Scholar
  6. Fabbri, A.G., and Kasvand, T., 1981, Image processing for the detection of two-dimensional Markovian properties as functions of distances from crystal profiles: Proc. 3rd European Symp. for Stereology, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia, p. 153-163.Google Scholar
  7. Fabbri, A.G., Kasvand, T., and Masounave, J., 1983, Adjacency relationships in aggregates of crystal profiles: Proc. NATO Adv. Study Inst, on Pictorial Data Analysis, Bonas, France, in Haralick, R.M., ed., NATO ASI Series, v. 4, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 449–468.Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, D., 1969, Grain contacts in crystalline rocks: Lithos, v. 2, no. 4, p. 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jen, L.S., 1975, Spatial distribution of crystals and phase equilibria in charnockitic granulites from the Adirondack Mountains, New York: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Univ. Ottawa, 248p.Google Scholar
  10. Kamineni, D.C., and Katsube, T.J., 1982, Hydraulic permeability differences between granites from the Lac du Bonnet (Manitoba) and Eye-Dashwa (Ontario) plutons, related to textural effects: Current Research, Part a, Geol. Survey Canada Paper 82-1A, p. 393-401.Google Scholar
  11. Kretz, R., 1966, Grain size distribution for certain metamorphic minerals in relation to nucleation and growth: Jour. Geology, v. 74, no. 2, p. 147–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kretz, R., 1969, On the spatial distribution of crystals in rocks: Lithos, v. 2, no. 1, p. 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, P.R., Reid, A.F., and Zuiderwyk, M.A., 1982, QEM*SEM image analysis in the determination of modal essays, mineral association and mineral liberation: Proc. XIV Intern. Mineral Processing Congr., Toronto, Oct. 17–23, 1982, Paper VIII-3, p. 1-20.Google Scholar
  14. Reid, A.F., Gottlieb, P., MacDonald, K.J., and Miller, P.R., 1984, QEM*SEM image analysis of ore minerals: volume fraction, liberation, and observational variances: Proc. ICAM84, Intern. Congr. on Applied Mineralogy in the Mineral Industry, Los Angeles, California, Feb. 22–25, 1984, p. 191-204.Google Scholar
  15. Vistelius, A.B., 1972, Ideal granite and its properties: I. The stochastic model: Jour. Math. Geology, v. 4, no. 1, p. 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vistelius, A.B., Agterberg, F.P., Divi, S.R., and Hogarth, D.D., 1983, A stochastic model for the crystallization and textural analysis of a fine-grained granitic stock near Meech Lake, Gatineau Park, Quebec: Geol. Survey Canada Paper 81-21, 62p.Google Scholar
  17. Whitten, E.H.T., Dacey, M.F., and Thompson, K., 1975, Markovian grain relationships of a Grenville granulite: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 275, no. 10, p. 1164–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea G. Fabbri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ralph Kretz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BolognaUSA
  2. 2.University of OttawaUSA

Personalised recommendations