Crustal Abundance Modeling of Mineral Resources: Recent Investigations and Preliminary Results

  • DeVerle P. Harris
Part of the Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences book series (CAES)


This paper reviews the evolution of crustal abundance models from the early univariate stock-based models of element concentration, to a bivariate statistical model of deposit size and grade, and ultimately to a multivariate model (4-dimensional). The extension to a multivariate statistical model is motivated by the desire to use a crustal abundance model to estimate resources and potential supply. Such use requires that the model possess the structure to permit credible costing of exploration and production. Accommodating such a requirement leads to specification of a statistical model that describes deposit size, grade, depth, and intradeposit grade variance. This paper reports on a preliminary investigation of the estimation of such a model for U.S. uranium.


Average Grade Uranium Deposit Multivariate Statistical Model Cumulative Production Open File Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agterberg, F.P., 1980, Lognormal models for several metals in selected areas in Canada, in Guillemin, C., and Lagny, P., eds., Colloque C-1. Ressources Minérales-Mineral Resources: 26th CGI, Bur. Recherches Géol. et Minières Mém. 106, Orleans, France, p. 83-90.Google Scholar
  2. Agterberg, F. P., and Divi, S. R. 1978, A statistical model for the distribution of copper, lead, and zinc in the Canadian Appalachian Region: Econ. Geology, v. 73, no. 2, p. 230–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahrens, L. H., 1953, A fundamental law of geochemistry: Nature, v. 172, no. 4390, p. 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahrens, L.H., 1954, The lognormal distribution of the elements: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 5, no. 2, p. 49–73; v. 6, no. 2/3, p. 121-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinck, J.W., 1967, Note on the distribution and predictability of mineral resources: Euratom 3461e, Brussels, 25 p.Google Scholar
  6. Charles River Associates, 1978, The economics and geology of mineral supply: an integrated framework for long-run policy analysis: CRA Report No. 327, 468 p.Google Scholar
  7. Deffeyes, K.S., and MacGregor, I.D., 1980, World uranium resources: Sci. American, v. 242, no. 1, p. 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeNapoli, F., 1976, Mineral resource adequacy: unpubl. masters thesis, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 217 p.Google Scholar
  9. DeWijs, H.J., 1951, Statistics of ore distribution part 1: Geol. Mijnbouw, v. 30, no. 11, p. 365–375.Google Scholar
  10. DeWijs, H.J., 1953, Statistics of ore distribution, part 2: Geol. Mijnbouw, v. 32, no. 1, p. 12–24.Google Scholar
  11. Drew, M.W., 1977, U.S. uranium deposits — a geostatistical model: Resources Policy, v. 3, no. 1, p. 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, J.R., Harris, D.P., and Van Wie, N.H., 1975, A subjective probability appraisal of uranium resources in the State of New Mexico: Open File Report GJO-110 (76), U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Grand Junction, Colorado, 97 p.Google Scholar
  13. Erickson, R.L., 1973, Crustal abundance of elements, and mineral reserves and resources, in Brobst, D.A., and Pratt, W.P., eds., United States mineral resources: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 820, p. 21-25.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, D.P., 1984a, Mineral resources appraisal: Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 448 p.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, D.P., 1984b., Mineral resources appraisal and policy — controversies, issues, and the future: Resources Policy, v. 10, no. 2, p. 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, D.P., and Agterberg, F.P., 1981, The appraisal of mineral resources: Economic Geology Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Volume 1905–1980, p. 897-938.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, D.P., and Chavez, L., 1981, Crustal abundance and a potential supply system. Part II, Systems and economics for estimation of uranium potential supply: Research report prepared under subcontract 78–238-E, Open File Report, U. S. Department of Energy, Grand Junction Office, Colorado, p. 385-506.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, D.P., and Chavez, L., 1984, Modelling dynamic supply of uranium — an experiment in the integration of economics, geology, and engineering: 18th Intern. Symp. on Application of Computers and Mathematics in the Mineral Industry, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, p. 817-892.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, D.P., Ortiz-Vertiz, S.R., Chavez, M.L., and Agbolosoo, E.K., 1981, Systems and economics for the estimation of uranium potential supply: Research report prepared under subcontract 78-238-E. Open File Report, U.S. Department of Energy, Grand Junction Office, Colorado, 609 p.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, D.P., and Skinner, B.J., 1982, The assessment of long-term supplies of minerals, in Smith, V.K., and Krutilla, J.V., eds., Explorations in natural resource economics: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Maryland, p. 247–326.Google Scholar
  21. Matheron, G., 1971, The theory of regionalized variables and its applications: Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematique de Fontainebleau, No. 5, Fontainebleau, France, 211 p.Google Scholar
  22. McKelvey, V.E., 1960, Relation of reserves of the elements to their crustal abundance: Am Jour. Sci., Bradley Volume, v. 258-A, p. 234–241.Google Scholar
  23. Singer, D.A., Cox, D.P., and Drew, L.J., 1975; Grade and tonnage relationships among copper deposits: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 907-A, p. A1—A11.Google Scholar
  24. Singer, D.A., and DeYoung, J.H., Jr., 1980, What can grade-tonnage relations really tell us? in Guillemin C. and Lagny, P., eds., Colloque C-1, Ressources Minerales — Mineral Resources: 26th CGI, Bur. Recherches Geol, et Minieres Mem. 106, Orleans, France, p. 91-101.Google Scholar
  25. Skinner, B.J., 1976, A second iron age ahead?: Am. Scientist, v. 64, no. 3, p. 258–269.Google Scholar
  26. United States Department of Energy, 1978, Statistical data of the uranium industry, January 1, 1978: U. S. Department of Energy, Grand Junction Office, Colorado, Open File Report GJ0-100(78), 91 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • DeVerle P. Harris
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations