Far and Near Ultraviolet Light as Molecular Probes for Assessment of DNA Repair and Radiosensitivity

  • Emanuel Riklis


In previous lectures I have described the effects of radiation on cells and cell constituents, the methods of evaluating the damage and the photo- and radiation- products which are responsible for the damage, and lead to either cell death or, what is sometimes worst, to mutation. For reasons of space and scope there will be no attempt to repeat in detail the description of these effects, and the details may be read in the outstanding presentation of B. Sutherland (1), and of Riklis (2), as well as in the different papers in this volume dealing with cellular repair mechanisms. If massive assaults by radiation or other damaging agents may be recognized easily and measured simply by survival curves, damage to the most sensitive cellular constituent, DNA, requires biochemical methods of detection. The lymphocyte, being the most sensitive cell, provided the necessary object for studying effects, by cytogenetical methods, but chromosome aberrations may be the end result of a series of biochemical events, among them the most important is the existence of molecular repair mechanisms, and it is the capacity of repair which dictates the fate of an irradiated cell. The phenomena of repair have become far more complicated than when excision repair was first discovered in 1963 (3,4,5). Not only repair capacity, but also repair fidelity determine the ultimate fate of the cell and organism: excision repair and photoreactivation are error-free, but other mechanisms such as postreplication-recombination, and the recently discovered SOS repair are error-prone, thus increasing the chance of mutation and carcinogenicity. In this respect, low-level radiation becomes more disturbing as its effects are not resulting so much in cell death as in cell mutation.


Repair Capacity Xeroderma Pigmentosum Label Thymidine Repair Synthesis Photoallergic Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sutherland B.M., in “Synchrotron Radiation Applied to Biophysical, Biochemical and Biomedical Research” NATO Advanced Studies Institute Summer School, Plenum Publ. Corp. 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riklis E., ibid.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Setlow R.B. and Carrier W.L., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 51, 226 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howard-Flanders P. and Boyce R.P., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 51, 239 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riklis E., Canad. J. Biochem. 43, 1207 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Setlow R.B., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 3363 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elkind M.M., Han A. and Chang-Liu C.M., Photochem. Photobiol. 27, 709 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heimer Y.M. and Riklis E., Biochemical J., in press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riklis E., Kol R. and Heimer Y.M., in preparation.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heimer Y.M. and Riklis E., in “DNA Repair and Late Effects” IGEGM Intl. Meeting, Tel-Aviv 1978 (Editors: Riklis, Slor and Altmann).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ames B.N., McCann J. and Yamasaki E., Mut. Res. 31, 347 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuel Riklis
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiobiology Dept. Nuclear Research Center-NegevIsrael Atomic Energy CommissionBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations