RoManSy 6 pp 412-419 | Cite as

Mobile Robotic Systems for Use in Unstructured Terrain

  • K. J. Waldron
  • S. Agrawal


Autonomous and teleoperated mobile platforms which have, so far, been constructed for use in unstructured terrain are of two types. One of these is a platform with wheels or tracks having a passive suspension. The other is a fully terrain adaptive legged locomotion system. However, the use of active coordination of multiple joints makes other configurations feasible, and attractive. A simple example is a wheeled system with an active suspension.

In this paper, unconventional locomotion element configurations will be explored, and a theory for their design to optimize their performance over both small and large amplitude terrain variations will be presented. An important point is that the characteristics desirable in a mobile robotic platform are somewhat different from those desirable in conventional vehicles. Another is that the performance characteristics required of the locomotion system are determined by sensing and computation capabilities of the system, and vice-versa.


Active Suspension Conventional Vehicle Passive Suspension Wheel Pair Amplitude Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Waldron, K.J. and McGhee, R.B., “The Adaptive Suspension Vehicle,” to appear in IEEE Control Systems Magazine.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon., Kaiser S pyder Model X5M, Industrial and Municipal Engineering Corp, Galva, Illinois, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anon., Tomorrow’s Mobile Man, Film, Defense Advanced Protects Agency, circa 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bekker, M.G., Introduction to Terrain-Vehicle Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waldron, K.J., “Mobility and Controllability Characteristics of Mobile Robotic Platforms,” Proceedings of 1985 IEEE. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, March 25–28, 1985, St. Louis, pp. 228–236.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agrawal, S.K., Mobility Characterization of Robotic Platforms, M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGhee, R.A., “Vehicular Legged Locomotion,” Advances in Automation and Robotics, Vol. 1, pp. 259–284, JAI Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waldron, K.J., “The Mechanics of Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of 1985 International Conference on Advanced Robotics September ’-10, 1985, Tokyo, pp. 533–544.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waldron, K.J., Song, S.M., Wang, S.L. and Vohnout, V.J., “Mechanical and Geometric Design of the Adaptive Suspension Vehicle,” Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Ed. Morecki, A., Bianchi, G., and Kedzior, K., Hermes, London, 1985, pp. 396–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hermes, Paris 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Waldron
    • 1
  • S. Agrawal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColombusUSA

Personalised recommendations