RoManSy 6 pp 221-245 | Cite as

The Kinematic Design and Mass Redistribution of Manipulator Arms for Decoupled and Invariant Inertia

  • H. Asada


A manipulator design theory for reduced dynamic complexity is presented. The kinematic structure and mass distribution of a manipulator arm are designed so that the inertia matrix in the equation of motion becomes diagonal and/or invariant for an arbitrary arm configuration. For the decoupled and invariant inertia matrix, the system can be treated as linear, single-input, single-output system with constant parameters. As a result, the control of the manipulator arm is simplified, and, more importantly, control performance can be improved due to the reduced dynamic complexity.

First, the problem of designing such an arm with the decoupled and/or configuration-invariant inertia matrix is defined. The inertia matrix is then analyzed in relation to the kinematic structure and mass properties of the arm links. Necessary conditions for the manipulator arm to possess a decoupled and/or configuration-invariant inertia matrix are obtained. Using the necessary conditions, we find the kinematic structure and mass properties for which the inertia matrix reduces to a constant, diagonal form. For 2 and 3 degree-of-freedom arms, possible arm designs for decoupled and/or invariant inertia matrices are then determined.


Mass Property Inertia Matrix Inertia Tensor Kinematic Structure Joint Axis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    II.Asada and K.Yocef-Toumi, “Analysis and Design of a Direct-Drive Arm with a Five-Bar-Link Parallel Drive Mechanism”, ASME Journal of Dyn. Sys. Men. Cont., Vol. 106–3, pp. 225–230, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S.11ubowsky and D.T.Des Forges, “The Application of model-Referenced Adaptive Control to Robotic Manipulators”, ASME Journal of Dyn. Sys. Mea. & Cont., Vol. 101–3, pp. 193–200, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M.Takegaki and S.Arimoto, “An Adaptive Trajectory Control of Manipulators”, Int. Journal of Control, Vol. 34–2, pp. 219–230, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    F.Freund, “Fast Nonlinear Control with Arbitrary Pole Placement for Industrial Robots and Manipulators”, Int. Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 1–1, pp. 65–78, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J-J.E.Slotine, “Sliding conttroller Design for Nonlinear Systems”, Int. Journal of Control, Vol. 40–2, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. [6).
    J.Y.S.Luh, M.W.Wallcer, and R.P.Paul, “On Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators”, ASME Journal of Dyn. Sys. Mea. Cont., Vol. 102, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.M.Ilollerbach, “A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and n Comparative Study of Dynamics Formulation Complexity”,IEEE Trnn. On Sys.,Man. & Cybernetics, pp.730–736, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Christopher G. Atkeson, Chae H. An, John M. Ilollerbach, “Estimation fof Inertial Parameters of Mnnipulator Loads and Links”, Third Inernational Symposium of Robotics Research,pp. 32–39, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [ 9 ]
    II. Mayeda, K.Osulca and A. Karr’awa, “A New Identification Method for Special Manipulator Arms”, 9th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, pp. 74–79, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    II.Asada, “A Geometrical Representation of manipulator Dynamics and Its Application to Arm Design”, ASME Journal of Dyn. Sys. Mea. & Cont., Vol. 104–3, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    II.Asada and J-J.E.Slotine, “Robot Analysis and Control”, John Wiley & Sons, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hermes, Paris 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Asada
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics PhysicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations