The Kinematic Design and Mass Redistribution of Manipulator Arms for Decoupled and Invariant Inertia
A manipulator design theory for reduced dynamic complexity is presented. The kinematic structure and mass distribution of a manipulator arm are designed so that the inertia matrix in the equation of motion becomes diagonal and/or invariant for an arbitrary arm configuration. For the decoupled and invariant inertia matrix, the system can be treated as linear, single-input, single-output system with constant parameters. As a result, the control of the manipulator arm is simplified, and, more importantly, control performance can be improved due to the reduced dynamic complexity.
First, the problem of designing such an arm with the decoupled and/or configuration-invariant inertia matrix is defined. The inertia matrix is then analyzed in relation to the kinematic structure and mass properties of the arm links. Necessary conditions for the manipulator arm to possess a decoupled and/or configuration-invariant inertia matrix are obtained. Using the necessary conditions, we find the kinematic structure and mass properties for which the inertia matrix reduces to a constant, diagonal form. For 2 and 3 degree-of-freedom arms, possible arm designs for decoupled and/or invariant inertia matrices are then determined.
KeywordsMass Property Inertia Matrix Inertia Tensor Kinematic Structure Joint Axis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- J-J.E.Slotine, “Sliding conttroller Design for Nonlinear Systems”, Int. Journal of Control, Vol. 40–2, 1984.Google Scholar
- [6).J.Y.S.Luh, M.W.Wallcer, and R.P.Paul, “On Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators”, ASME Journal of Dyn. Sys. Mea. Cont., Vol. 102, 1980.Google Scholar
- J.M.Ilollerbach, “A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and n Comparative Study of Dynamics Formulation Complexity”,IEEE Trnn. On Sys.,Man. & Cybernetics, pp.730–736, 1980.Google Scholar
- Christopher G. Atkeson, Chae H. An, John M. Ilollerbach, “Estimation fof Inertial Parameters of Mnnipulator Loads and Links”, Third Inernational Symposium of Robotics Research,pp. 32–39, 1985.Google Scholar
- [ 9 ]II. Mayeda, K.Osulca and A. Karr’awa, “A New Identification Method for Special Manipulator Arms”, 9th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, pp. 74–79, 1981.Google Scholar
- II.Asada, “A Geometrical Representation of manipulator Dynamics and Its Application to Arm Design”, ASME Journal of Dyn. Sys. Mea. & Cont., Vol. 104–3, 1983.Google Scholar
- II.Asada and J-J.E.Slotine, “Robot Analysis and Control”, John Wiley & Sons, 1986.Google Scholar