Prospective Randomized Study of the St. Jude Medical®, BjÖrk-Shiley®, and Starr-Edwards® 6120 Valve Prostheses in the Mitral Position

  • Ph. Mikaeloff
  • O. Jegaden
  • M. Ferrini
  • J. Coll-Mazzei
  • J. Y. Bonnefoy
  • A. Rumolo


During a 5-year period (January 1979 to December 1983), 357 patients received mitral valve replacement. Group A was comprised of 179 patients receiving a ST. JUDE MEDICAL® prosthesis in the mitral position. Group B included 178 patients; initially 113 patients were implanted with a BJÖRK-SHILEY® valve, and later 65 patients received a STARR-EDWARDS® 6120 valve prosthesis in the mitral position. All implants were performed by the same surgeon and the groups were randomized. Analysis of 21 preoperative (clinical and hemodynamic data) and operative variables showed the groups to be well randomized. All patients were anticoagulated postoperatively. A follow-up study was performed each year postoperatively. At the end of 1986, there was a 35-month to 95-month follow-up with a mean of 64.7 months (1596 patient-years of follow-up). Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. The actuarial survival rate is significantly different (p < 0.05) at 5 years with 87.6 ± 4.5% for Group A vs. 77.4 ± 6% for Group B, and at 7 years with 83.4 ± 6.5% for Group A vs. 73.2 ± 7.2% for Group B. In conclusion, in the mitral position, the ST. JUDE MEDICAL prosthesis gives a significant benefit compared to BJÖRK-SHILEY or STARR-EDWARDS 6120 prostheses.


Valve Replacement Aortic Valve Replacement Mitral Valve Replacement Jude Medical Valve Prosthesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mikaeloff P, Amouroux C, Boivin J, Loire R, Vial C. Technique de protection myocardique par perfusion en hypothermie profonde (10°C) avec ou sans cardioplegie. Nouvelle Presse Médicale 1979; 8:4105–4108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bleese N, Doring V, Kalmar P, Pokar H, Polonius MJ, Steiner D, Rodewald G. Intraoperative myocardial protection by cardioplegia in hypothermia. Clinical findings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978; 75:405–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baudet EM, Oca CC, Roques XF, Laborde MN, Hafez AS, Collot MA, Ghidoni IM. A 51/2 year experience with the St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90:137–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Björk VO. Optimal orientation of the 60° and the 70° Björk-Shiley tilting disc valves. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 16:113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mikaeloff P, Van Haecke P, Girard C, Tartulier M, DeVolfe C, Guillaud C, Lakestani F, Roche M, Guillerm R, Masurel G. Prevention des microembolies gazeuses en chirurgie cardiaque: controle numerique du debullage des cavites cardiaques par detecteur a ultrasons. Arch Mal Coeur 1984; 77:314–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oyer PE, Stinson EG, Griepp RB, Shumway NE. Valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards and Hancock prosthesis. Comparative analysis of late morbidity and mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1977; 186:301–307.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edmunds LH. Thromboembolic complications of current cardiac valvular prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1982; 34:96–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Am Stat Assoc J 1958;53:457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Actuarial analysis of surgical results: Rationale and method. Ann Thorac Surg 1977; 24:404–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966; 50:163–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bodnar E, Haberman S, Wain WH. Comparative method for actuarial analysis of cardiac valve replacements. Br Heart J 1979; 42:541–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacManus Q, Grunkemeier GL, Lambert LE, Teply JF, Harlan BJ, Starr A. Year of operation as a risk factor in the late results of valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 80:834–841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teply JF, Grunkemeier GL, D’Arcy Sutherland H, Lambert LE, Johnson VA, Starr A. The ultimate prognosis after valve replacement: an assessment at twenty years. Ann Thorac Surg 1981;32:111–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell RS, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Jamieson SW, Baldwin JC, Shumway NE. Significant patient-related determinants of prosthetic valve performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91:807–817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuster V, Pumphrey LW, McGoon MD, Chesebro JH, Pluth JR, McGoon DC. Systemic thromboembolism in mitral and aortic Starr-Edwards prostheses: A 10–19 year follow-up. Circulation 1982; 66(Suppl I):157–161.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horstkotte D, Haerten MK, Herzer JA, Seipel L, Bircks W, Loogen F. Preliminary results in mitral valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis: Comparison with the Björk-Shiley valve. Circulation 1981; 64(Suppl II):203–208.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murphy DA, Levine FH, Buckley MJ, Swinski L, Daggett WM, Akins LW, Austen WG. Mechanical valves; A comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 86:746–752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perier P, Deloche A, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN, Rossant P, Bessou JP, Relland J, Bourezak H, Gomez F, Blondeau P, D’Allaines C, Carpentier A. Comparative evaluation of mitral valve repair and replacement with Starr, Björk and porcine valve prostheses. Circulation 1984; 70(Suppl I):187–192.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horstkotte D, Haerten K, Herzer JA, Loogen F, Scheibling R, Schulte HD. Five-year results after randomized mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley, Lillehei-Kaster and Starr-Edwards prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 31:206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bloomfield P, Kitchin AH, Wheatley DJ, Walbaum PR, Lutz W, Miller MC. A Prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses. Circulation 1986; 73:1213–1222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Björk VO, Book K, Cernigliaro C, Holmgren A. The Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in isolated mitral lesions. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973; 7:131–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheung D, Flemma RJ, Mullen DC, Lepley D, Anderson AJ, Weirauch E. Ten-year follow-up in aortic valve replacement using the Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 32:138–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Daenen W, Nevelsteen A, VanCauwelaert P, De Maesschalk E, Willems J, Stalpaert G. Nine years’ experience with the Björk-Shiley prosthetic valve: Early and late results of 932 valve replacements. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 35:651–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lepley D, Flemma RJ, Mullen PL, Singh M, Chakravarty S. Late evaluation of patients undergoing valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1977; 24:131–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Björk VO, Henze A. Ten years’ experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78:331–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nicoloff DM, Emery RW, Arom KV, Northaus WF, Jorgensen CR, Wang Y, Lindsay WG. Clinical and hemodynamic results with the St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis. A three year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 82:674–683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saunders CR, Rossi NP, Rittenhouse EA. Failure of a Björk-Shiley mitral valve prosthesis to open—clinical recognition. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1977; 18:571–576.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Negre E, Fernere M, Negre G, Blin B. Blocages immediats des protheses mitrales de Björk-Shiley a disque convexo-concave. Ann Chir Thorac Cardiovasc 1983; 37:160–162.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams DB, Pluth JR, Orszulak T. Extrinsic obstruction of the Björk-Shiley valve in the mitral position. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 32:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karp RB, Cyrus RJ, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT, Pacifico AD. The Björk-Shiley valve: Intermediate-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81:602–614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wright JO, Hiratzka LF, Brandt B, Doty DB. Thrombosis of the Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Illustrative cases and review of the literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84:138–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mattingly WT, O’Connor W, Zeok JV, Todd EP. Thrombotic catastrophe in the patient with multiple Björk-Shiley prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 35:253–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mikaeloff P, Van Haecke P, Frieh J, Convert G, Biron A, Amouroux C, Boivin J. Facteurs pronostiques après remplacement valvulaire mitral par la prothèse de Starr-Edwards modèle 6120. Arch Mal Coeur 1981; 74:799–807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Horstkotte D, Korfer R, Seipel L, Bircks W, Loogen F. Late complications in patients with Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement. Circulation 1983; 68(Suppl II):175–184.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dupon H, Michaud JLL, Duveau D, Despins P, Train M. Mitral valve replacement with St. Jude Medical prostheses: A 60 month study of 350 cases at Centre Hospitalier Universitair. In Matloff JM (ed): Cardiac Valve Replacement; Martinus Nijhoff, Boston 1985; pp 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Horstkotte D, Haerten K, Seipel L, Körfer R, Budde T, Bircks W, Loogen F. Central hemodynamics at rest and during exercise after mitral valve replacement with different prostheses. Circulation 1983; 68(Suppl II):161–168.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ferrini M, Tartulier M, Boutarin J, Ritz B, Delahaye JP, Delaye J, Deyrieux F, Blum J, Corsini G, Mikaeloff P. Contrôle hémodynamique au repos et à l’effort après remplacement valvulaire mitral par prothèse de St. Jude Médical. Arch Mal Coeur 1985; 78:111–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sutton J, Roudaut M, Oldershaw P. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling characteristics after mitral valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. Br Heart J 1981; 45:365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bruss KM, Rene M, Van Gilse J, Knott E. Pressure drop and velocity fields at four mechanical heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley standard, Björk-Shiley convexo-concave, Hall-Kaster, and St. Jude Medical. Life Support Systems 1983; 1:3–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ph. Mikaeloff
  • O. Jegaden
  • M. Ferrini
  • J. Coll-Mazzei
  • J. Y. Bonnefoy
  • A. Rumolo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations