Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Valves Following Aortic Valve Replacement

  • A. M. Borkon
  • L. M. Soule
  • K. L. Baughman
  • W. A. Baumgardner
  • T. J. Gardner
  • L. Watkins
  • V. L. Gott
  • B. A. Reitz


Selection of a mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve should be based on the results of comparative long-term performance characteristics of both types of valves. In order to discern the risk-benefit ratio of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, the follow-up of 419 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1976 and 1981 was reviewed to determine late valve-related complications. Aortic valve replacement was performed with BJÖRK-SHILEY® (266) or bioprosthetic (porcine 126 and pericardial 27) aortic valves. Cumulative patient follow-up was 1705 patient-years; the mean patient follow-up was 4.1 ± 2.7 years. For all but 11 patients, survival data was obtained for up to 9 years after operation. At 5 years, survival was 81 ± 4% for all valve recipients. Valve failure in the BJÖRK-SHILEY group was predominantly due to valve-related mortality and did not result from structural failure. Patients with bioprosthetic valves experienced valve failure due to prosthetic endocarditis and intrinsic valve degeneration. While patients with bioprosthetic valves experienced a lower incidence of valve-related morbidity than mechanical valve recipients (p < 0.03), no difference between valve types could be demonstrated in the incidence of valve-related mortality or valve failure at 5 years. Mortality due to valve failure was higher for mechanical than bioprosthetic valves (p < 0.01).


Valve Replacement Aortic Valve Replacement Bioprosthetic Valve Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Valve Thrombosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mitchell RS, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Jamieson SW, Baldwin JC, Shumway NE. Significant patient-related determinants of prosthetic valve performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91:807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borkon AM, Soule LM, Baughman KL, Aoun H, Gardner TJ, Watkins L Jr, Gott VL, Reitz BA. Ten-year analysis of the Björk-Shiley standard aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg, in press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller DC, Oyer PE, Mitchell RS, Stinson ED, Jamieson SW, Baldwin JC, Shumway NE. Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 88:193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumgartner WA, Miller DC, Reitz BA, Oyer PE, Jamieson SW, Stinson EB, Shumway NE. Surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 35:87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spray TL, Roberts WC. Structural changes in porcine xenografts used as substitute cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40:319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lefrak EA, Starr A (eds). Cardiac Valve Prostheses. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1979; p 38.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods (7th ed). Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1980; p41.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breslow N. A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika 1970; 57:579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 1972; 26:103.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dixon WJ (ed). BMDP Statistical Software. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karp RB, Cyrus RJ, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT, Pacifico A. The Björk-Shiley valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81:602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohn LH, Allred EN, DiSesa VJ, Sawtelle K, Shemin RJ, Collins JJ Jr. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 88:695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Björk VO, Henze A. Ten years’ experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78:331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daenen W, Nevelsteen A, van Cauwelaert P, de Maesschalk E, Willems J, Stalpaert G. Nine years’ experience with the Björk-Shiley prosthetic valve: Early and late results of 932 valve replacements. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 35:651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sethia B, Turner MA, Lewis S, Rodger RA, Bain WH, Kouchoukos NT. Fourteen years’ experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91:350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magiligan DJ, Lewis JW, Tilley B, Peterson E. The porcine bioprosthetic valve: Twelve years later. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89:499.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohn LH, Mudge GH, Pratter F, Collins JJ Jr. Five to eight-year follow-up of patients undergoing porcine heart-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hartz RS, Fisher EB, Finkelmeier B, DeBoer A, Sanders JH Jr, Moran JM, Michaelis LL. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91:910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oyer PE, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Reitz BA, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Shumway NE. Clinical durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthetic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 80:824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammond GL, Geha AS, Kopf GS, Hashin SW. Biological vs. mechanical valves: Analysis of 1104 valves inserted in 1012 adult patients with a 4801 patient-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, in press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Janusz MT, Jamieson WR, Allen P, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, Tutassura H, Burr L, Gerein AN, Tyers GFO. Experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve prosthesis in 700 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1982; 34:625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gersh BJ, Fisher LD, Schaff HV, Rahimtoola SH, Reeder GS, Frater RWM, McGoon DC. Issues concerning the clinical evaluation of new prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91:460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tepley JF, Grunkemeier GL, Sutherland HD, Lambert LE, Johnson VA, Starr A. The ultimate prognosis after valve replacement: An assessment at twenty years. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 32:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martinell J, Fraile J, Artiz V, Moreno J, Rabago G. Long-term comparative analysis of Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90:741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jamieson WRE, Janusz MT, Miyagishima RT, Munro AI, Tutassura H, Gerein AN, Burr LH, Allen P. Embolic complications of porcine heterograft cardiac valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81:626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joyce LD, Nelson RM. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 88:102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wright JO, Hiratzka LF, Brandt B, Doty DB. Thrombosis of the Björk-Shiley prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84:138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Douglas PS, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Edie RN, Harken AH, Stephenson LW, Edmunds LH Jr. Clinical comparison of St. Jude Medical and porcine aortic valve prostheses. Circulation 1985; 72(Suppl II):II-135.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitchell RS, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Jamieson SW, Baldwin JC, Shumway NE. Perspectives on the porcine xenograft valve. Cardiol Clinics 1985; 3:371.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cobanoglu A, Jamieson WRE, Miller DC, McKinley C, Grunkemeier GL, Flöten HS, Miyagishima RT, Tyers GFO, Shumway NE, Starr A. A tri-institutional comparison of tissue and mechanical vlaves using a patient-oriented definition of treatment failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 43:245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perier P, Bessou JP, Swanson JS, Bensasson D, Chachques JC, Chauvaud S, Deloche A, FabianiJN, Blondeau P, D’Allaines C, Carpentier A. Comparative evaluation of aortic valve replacement with Starr, Björk and porcine valve prostheses. Circulation 1985; 72(Suppl II): 11–140.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rutledge R, Kim GJ, Applebaum E. Actuarial analysis of the risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis in 1598 patients with mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Arch Surg 1985; 120:469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sweeney MS, Reul GJ Jr, Cooley DA, Ott DA, Duncan JM, Frazier OH, Livesay JJ. Comparison of bioprosthetic and mechanical valve replacement for active endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90:676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nistal F, Garcia-Satue E, Artinano E, Gomez-Duran CM, Gallo I. Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57:161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reul GJ Jr, Cooley DA, Duncan JM, Frazier OH, Hallman GL, Livesay JJ, Ott DA, Walker WE. Valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: Analysis of 2680 patients. J Vasc Surg 1985; 2:192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Valfre C, Talenti E, Guerra F, Thiene G, Gallucci V. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90:564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wideman FE, Blackstone EH, KirklinJW, Karp RB, Kouchoukos NT, Pacifico AD. Hospital mortality of re-replacement of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 82:692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Husebye DG, Pluth JR, Piehler JM, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, Danielson GK. Reoperation on prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 86:543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grenadier E, Sahn DJ, Roche AH, Valdes-Cruz LM, Copeland JG, Goldberg SJ, Allen HD. Detection of deterioration or infection of homograft and porcine xenograft bioprosthetic valves in mitral and aortic positions by two-dimensional echocardiographic examination. JACC 1983; 2:452.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Borkon
  • L. M. Soule
  • K. L. Baughman
  • W. A. Baumgardner
  • T. J. Gardner
  • L. Watkins
  • V. L. Gott
  • B. A. Reitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations