Abstract
This chapter1 provides an economic analysis of the post-divestiture inter-LATA (Local Access and Transport Areas) telephone business. The analysis shows that the industry is not now competitive in its structure, and is unlikely to become more so. Competitive industries used to be defined in terms of the number of competing firms and their relative sizes. However, Baumol and others have introduced and refined the concept of contestability. An industry might have only one participating firm, but if the market were contestable there would be no adverse impact on economic efficiency. In an economically efficient industry, no firm can long sustain prices greater than economic costs. The number and relative sizes of firms does not matter. If the marginal cost structures of actual and potential competitors are similar, and sunk costs are unimportant, then new entry or the expansion of existing firms will destroy the incentives for any firm to set prices above competitive levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Brown, Stephen J., and David S. Sibley. 1986. The Theory of Public Utility Pricing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simnett, R.E. (1989). Contestable Markets and Telecommunications. In: Crew, M.A. (eds) Deregulation and Diversification of Utilities. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6897-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6897-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-6899-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6897-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive