The Financial Fallout from Chernobyl: Risk Perceptions and Regulatory Response

  • Catherine C. Eckel
  • Theo Vermaelen
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 3)


In this chapter we explore the effect of the Chernobyl nuclear accident on the returns of nuclear electric utilities in the United States. We use the accepted market model to analyze the impact of the accident on stock prices in two periods: (1) the period immediately following the announcement of the accident on April 28,1986; and (2) the period surrounding the release of the Soviet report detailing the circumstances of the accident on August 18, 1986. The study is in the spirit of the work on the financial effects of the Three Mile Island nuclear accident by Bowen, Castanias, and Daley (1983) and Pulley and Hewlet (1985), and it confirms and extends Fields and Janjigian (1987). Our technique is first to estimate the impact of the accident on each utility in our sample, to test for individual and aggregate effects for nuclear and nonnuclear firms, then to explain differences in effects across firms using what we know about the regulatory environment of nuclear utilities. We find that nuclear utility stock prices were negatively affected by the accident, and the magnitude of the effect is related to the nuclear “exposure” of the utility. The release of the report had a positive effect, partially offsetting the initial impact. We also discuss the expected effect on nuclear liability and safety regulation and the government response to the accident.


Cash Flow Abnormal Return Liability Limit Chernobyl Accident Nuclear Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berk, Joel, ed. 1981. Public Utility Finance and Accounting: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  2. Binder, John J. 1985. “On the Use of the Multivariate Regression Model in Event Studies.” Journal of Accounting Research 23(1): 370–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen, Robert M., Richard P. Castanias, and Lane A. Daley. 1983. “Intra-Industry Effects of the Accident at Three Mile Island.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 18(1):87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 1987. Inventory of Power Plants in the United States 1986. DOE/EIA-0095(86), August.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 1987. Commercial Nuclear Power 1987: Prospects for the U S. and the World, July.Google Scholar
  6. Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Geoffrey S. Rothwell. 1987. “Preparing for the Improbable: Safety Incentives and the Price-Anderson Act.” California Institute of Technology, Social Science Working Paper 642 (May).Google Scholar
  7. Eckel, Catherine C., and Theo Vermaelen. 1988. “The Capital Market Fallout from Chernobyl.” VPI Working Paper, Xerox.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, Michael. 1987. “Chernobyl: One Year After.” National Geographic 171(5):632–653.Google Scholar
  9. Fields, M. Andrew, and Vahan Janjigian. 1987. “The Effects of Chernobyl on Electric Utility Stock Prices.” Department of Business Administration, University of Delaware (April) Xerox.Google Scholar
  10. Moody’s Public Utility Manual. 1987.Google Scholar
  11. Naill, Roger F., H. Donald Burbant, and Sheryl Sturges. 1986. “Least-Cost Planning for Combination Gas & Electric Utilities.” Public Utilities Fortnightly 118 (no. 3, August 7): 36.Google Scholar
  12. Nuclear News. 1986. “World List of Nuclear Plants.” (August): 91–94.Google Scholar
  13. Pulley, Lawrence B., and James G. Hewlet. 1985. “Financial Market Reactions to the Accident at Three Mile Island.” Working Paper No. 85–023, School of Business Administration, College of William and Mary (October).Google Scholar
  14. Schipper, Katherine, and Rex Thompson. 1983. “The Impact of Merger-Related Regulations on the Shareholders of Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Accounting Research 21(1): 184–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schipper, Katherine, and Rex Thompson. 1985. “The Impact of Merger-Related Regulations Using Exact Distributions of Test Statistics.” Journal of Accounting Research 23(1):408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwert, G. William. 1981. “Using Financial Data to Measure the Effects of Regulation. ” Journal of Law and Economics 24(1): 121 – 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sherman, Roger. 1974. Economics of Industry. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  18. Smirlock, M., and Howard Kaufold. 1987. “Bank Foreign Lending, Mandatory Disclosure Rules, and the Reaction of Bank Stock Prices to the Mexican Debt Crisis.” Journal of Business 60(3):347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood, William C. 1982. Insuring Nuclear Power: Liability, Safety, and Economic Efficiency. Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, series edited by Edward I. Altman and Ingo Walter, volume 38. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine C. Eckel
  • Theo Vermaelen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations