Cooperation of two manipulators in assembly tasks

  • P. Dauchez
  • P. Coiffet
  • A. Fournier


This paper deals with the use of two manipulators, working together in assembly tasks, and tries to show the significance of their cooperation. It surveys some different examples of such a cooperation: kinematic problems are examined. The paper then presents experiments that have been carried out with two compliant arms; the solutions used are also developed. At the end of the paper, problems set by using two manipulators are briefly described.


Grip Force Instantaneous Velocity Industrial Robot Angle Alpha Approach Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Takahashi, M. Kohno. 1982. “An assembly robot system with twin arms and vision,” 6th Internat. Conf. on Industr. Robot Technol. Paris, June 9–11Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    James B. Canner. 1975. “Two arms are better than one,” 5th Internat. Symp. on Industr. Robots. Chicago, September 22–24.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Fujii, S. Kurono. 1975. “Co-ordinated computer control of a pair of manipulators,” The Industrial Robot, December.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Ishida. 1977. “Force control in coordination of two arms,” 5th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Massachussets Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. E. Orin, S. Y. Oh. 1981. “Control of force distribution in robotic mechanisms containing closed kinematic chains,” Trans. ASME, Vol. 102, June.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Draganoiu. 1982. “Computer method for setting dynamical model of an industrial robot with closed kinematic chains,” 6th Internat. Conf. on Industr. Robot Technol. Paris, June 9–11.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Fournier. 1980. “Génération de mouvements en robotique; application des inverses généralisées et des pseudo-inverses,” Thèse d’etat, U.S.T.L. Montpellier.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Khalil. 1976. “Modélisation et commande par calculateur du manipulateur MA-23. Extension à la conception par ordinateur des manipulateurs,” Thèse de Docteur Ingenieur, U.S.T.L. Montpellier.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Vilamosa. 1982. “Etude et réalisation d’un transformateur de coordonnées programmable pour robots manipulateurs,” Thèse de Troisième Cycle, U.S.T.L. Montpellier.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Jouvencel, P. Coiffet, and J. Pot. 1982. “Un système de vision artificielle pour robot-manipulateur,” in Opto 82, November 16–18, ESI Publications.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Coiffet. 1981. “Les Robots. Interaction avec l’Environnement,” Hermes, France, 283 pp.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Coiffet. 1981. “Les Robots. Modélisation et Commande,” Hermes, France, 155 pp.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Borrel. 1979. “Modèle de comportement de manipulateurs: application à l’analyse de leurs performances et à leur commande automatique,” Thèse de Troisième Cycle, U.S.T.L. Montpellier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Crane Russak & Company Inc 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Dauchez
    • 1
  • P. Coiffet
    • 1
  • A. Fournier
    • 1
  1. 1.Science et Techniques du LanguedocLaboratoire d’Automatique de Montpellier UniversitéMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations