Advertisement

Measuring Sedimentation, Diffusion, and Molecular Weights of Small Molecules by Direct Fitting of Sedimentation Velocity Concentration Profiles

  • John S. Philo
Part of the Emerging Biochemical and Biophysical Techniques book series (EBBT)

Abstract

Sedimentation velocity experiments have traditionally been used for samples with relatively high sedimentation coefficients and low diffusion. Such samples give sharp boundaries from which it is relatively easy to extract the sedimentation coefficient, and which permit the separation of multicomponent samples into distinct boundaries. However, many proteins of interest for therapeutic purposes, such as cytokines and growth factors, have molecular masses of only 10–40 kDa. Even at 60000 rpm, such small molecules give very broad boundaries which are difficult to analyze by existing techniques.

Keywords

Sedimentation Velocity Sedimentation Coefficient Cell Bottom Partial Specific Volume Derivative Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attn AK and Lewis MS (1992): A fitting function for the analysis of sedimentation velocity concentration distributions. In: Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science, Harding SE, Rowe AJ and Horton JC, eds. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  2. Claverie J-M, Dreux H and Cohen R (1975): Sedimentation of generalized systems of interacting particles. I. Solution of systems of complete Lamm equations. Biopolymers 14, 1685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fujita H. (1975): Foundations of Ultracentrifugal Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 64–81.Google Scholar
  4. Goldberg RJ (1953): Sedimentation in the ultracentrifiige. J. Phys. Chem. 57: 194 - 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holladay LA (1979): An approximate solution to the Lamm equation. Biophys. Chem. 10: 187–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holladay LA (1980): Simultaneous rapid estimation of sedimentation coefficient and molecular weight. Biophys. Chem. 11: 303–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson ML and Faunt LM (1992): Parameter estimation by least-squares methods. Methods Enzymol. 210: 1–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson ML and Straume M (1993): Comments on the analysis of sedimentation equilibrium experiments. In: Modern Analytical Ultracentrifugation, Schuster TM and Laue TM, eds. Boston: Birkhauser Publishing Inc., this volume, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  9. Laue TM, Shah BD, Ridgeway TM and Pelletier SL (1992): Computer- aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. In: Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science, Harding SE, Rowe AJ and Horton JC, eds. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  10. Muramatsu N and Minton AP (1988): An automated method for rapid determination of diffusion coefficients via measurements of boundary spreading. Anal. Biochem. 168: 345–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Philo JS, Rosenfeld R, Arakawa T, Wen J and Narhi LO (1993): Refolding of brain-derived neurotrophic factor from guanidine hydrochloride: Kinetic trapping in a collapsed form which is incompetent for dimerization. Biochemistry 32: 10812–10818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. van Holde KE (1975): Sedimentation analysis of proteins. In: The Proteins, 3rd ed., vol. 1, Neurath H and Hill R, eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • John S. Philo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations