Advertisement

Banks are not Special: The Federal Safety Net and Banking Powers

  • Walker F. Todd
Part of the Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions book series (IFMI)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to stimulate reconsideration of fundamental principles in the debate on the restructuring of the financial services industry. Four underlying propositions are defended:
  1. 1.

    Public moneys should not be used to subsidize the risk-taking activities of depository institutions.

     
  2. 2.

    The lender of last resort should confine its activities to lending to support the short-term liquidity needs of depository institutions and should not engage in equity investment or capital replacement for banks or thrift institutions.

     
  3. 3.

    The deposit insurance laws should be strictly construed to reduce moral hazard and to avoid favoring one class of institutions or claimants over other classes.

     
  4. 4.

    The central bank should neither monetize the Treasury’s deficits nor make payments that either would not be made or would be made by the Treasury if the central bank did not make them.

     

Keywords

Central Bank Federal Reserve Deposit Insurance Bank Failure Financial Service Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 1990. “Factors Affecting Reserve Balances of Depository Institutions and Condition Statement of F.R. Banks.” Publication H-1. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors, April 19.Google Scholar
  2. Caliguire, Daria B., and Thomson, James B. 1987. “FDIC Policies for Dealing with Failed and Troubled Institutions.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Commentary, October 1.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, Davis R. 1903. Financial History of the United States. New York: Longmans Green Co.Google Scholar
  4. Duke, Paul, Jr. 1990. “Basis of Fed’s Oversight of Bank Firms May Be Questioned in Wake of Ruling.” Wall Street Journal, May 17, p. A3.Google Scholar
  5. Ely, Bert. 1989. “Technology, Regulation and the Financial Services Industry in the Year 2000.” In Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, The Financial Services Industry in the Year 2000: Risk and Efficiency, proceedings of a conference on Bank Structure and Competition, May 11–13, 1988, pp. 578–601.Google Scholar
  6. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 1987. Annual Report 1986. Washington, D.C.: FDIC.Google Scholar
  7. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 1988. Annual Report 1987. Washington, D.C.: FDIC.Google Scholar
  8. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 1989. Annual Report 1988. Washington, D.C.: FDIC.Google Scholar
  9. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 1987. Annual Report 1986.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, Milton. 1960. A Program for Monetary Stability. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, Bray. 1957. Banks and Politics in America. From the Revolution to the Civil War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hamilton, Alexander. (1904) 1972a. “Opinion as to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States” (1791). In The Works of Alexander Hamilton, edited by Henry Cabot Lodge, vol. 3, pp. 445–93. Reprint. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Haskell House.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, Alexander. (1904) 1972b. “Report on Manufactures” (1791). In The Works of Alexander Hamilton, edited by Henry Cabot Lodge, vol. 4, pp. 70–198. Reprint. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Haskell House.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, Alexander. (1904) 1972c. “Report on National Bank” (1790). In The Works of Alexander Hamilton, edited by Henry Cabot Lodge, vol. 3, pp. 388–443. Reprint. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Haskell House.Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heinemann, H. Erich. 1988. “Pious Phrases Aside, Cause of SL Crisis Was Fraud, Greed, and Mismanagement.” American Banker, September 26, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  17. Holland, Kelley. 1990. “Bank of New England Said to Be on Mend.” American Banker, May 18.Google Scholar
  18. Jefferson, Thomas. 1975. “Opinion on the Constitutionality of the National Bank.” (1791). In The Portable Thomas Jefferson, edited by Merrill D. Peterson, pp. 261–62. New York: Viking Portable Library, no. 80, Pengu in Books.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, Jesse H., with Edward Angly. 1951. Fifty Billion Dollars: My Thirteen Years with the RFC, 1932–1945. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Kane, Edward J. 1985. The Gathering Crisis in Federal Deposit Insurance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lever, Harold, and Huhne, Christopher. 1986. Debt and Danger. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  22. Litan, Robert E. 1987. What Should Banks Do? Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  23. McTague, Jim, and Rehm, Barbara. 1988. “Wall Now Says FSLIC Needs $45 Billion.” American Banker, October 6, p. 3.Google Scholar
  24. Penning, Ann Cooper. 1968. “Aid to Distressed Banks-Yesterday and Today.” Graduate School of Banking dissertation. Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  25. Rehm, Barbara. 1988. “FDIC Proposes Extended Coverage.” American Banker, October 12, p. 3.Google Scholar
  26. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3d ed. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  27. Spero, Joan Edelman. (1942) 1980. The Failure of the Franklin National Bank. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sprague, Irvine. 1986. Bailout. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Todd, Walker F. 1988. “Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future in Lender of Last Resort Theory.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper no. 8805, August.Google Scholar
  30. Upham, Cyril B., and Lamke, Edwin. 1934. Closed and Distressed Banks: A Study in Public Administration. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  31. Wolf, Frederick D. 1988. “The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation—Current Financial Condition and Outlook.” Statement before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, May 19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walker F. Todd

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations