A lifecycle inventory of solid waste

  • P. White
  • M. Franke
  • P. Hindle


The lifecycle inventory technique described in Chapter 3 is applied to waste management. The possible uses for an inventory of different waste management options are discussed. The functional unit for the comparison is defined, as are the system boundaries. This includes defining the ‘cradle’ and ‘grave’ for waste. The general structure of waste management systems, which forms the basis of the LCI model, is mapped out, and the computer spreadsheet developed to conduct the LCI is introduced.


Solid Waste Waste Management Waste Management System Water Emission Computer Spreadsheet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boustead, I. (1993). Resource Use and Liquid Food Packaging. EC Directive 85/339: UK Data 1986–1990. A report for INCPEN, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Clayton et al. (1991) Review of municipal solid waste incineration in the UK. Warren Spring Laboratory Report LR 776 (PA), Department of the Environment Research Programme.Google Scholar
  3. Coombs J. (1990) The present and future of anaerobic digestion. In: Anaerobic Digestion: a Waste Treatment Technology, Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
  4. DoE/DTI (1991) Ecolabelling of washing machines. Environmental Labelling-, Newsletter from the National Advisory Group on EcoLabelling, Issue 2.Google Scholar
  5. ERRA (1991) Resource. Report of European Recovery and Recycling Association, 1991. ERRA, Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. ERRA (1993) Project summary sheets. European Recovery and Recycling Association, 83 Ave E. Mounier, Box 14, Brussels 1200, Belgium.Google Scholar
  7. Finnveden, G. (1992) Landfilling — a forgotten part of lifecycle assessment. In: Product Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Methodology. Nordic Council of Ministers, pp. 263–288.Google Scholar
  8. Habersatter, K. (1991) Ökobilanz von Packstoffen Stand 1990. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL) Report No. 132, Bern, Switzerland (1991).Google Scholar
  9. IGD (1992) Sustainable waste management: the Adur project. Report by the Institute for Grocery Distribution, Letchmore Heath, Watford, UK. 85 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Kirkpatrick, N. (1992) Choosing a waste disposal option on the basis of a lifecycle assessment. Proc. PIRA Conf.: Lifecycle Analysis-Protecting Your Market Share, Gatwick, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Ogilvie, S.M. (1992) A review of the environmental impact of recycling. Warren Spring Laboratory report LR 911 (MR).Google Scholar
  12. Stalmans, M. (1992) LCA studies for chemical substances: major detergent surfactants and their raw materials. Proc. 3rd CESIO Congress, London, pp. 237–250.Google Scholar
  13. Vogg, H. (1992) Arguments in favor of waste incineration. Annual European Toxicology Forum, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  14. White, P.R., Hindle P. and Dräger, K. (1993). Lifecycle assessment of packaging. In: Packaging in the Environment, ed. G. Levy. Blackie, Glasgow, pp. 118–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. White
    • 1
  • M. Franke
    • 2
  • P. Hindle
    • 3
  1. 1.Procter & Gamble Ltd.UK
  2. 2.Procter & Gamble GmbHGermany
  3. 3.Environmental Quality - EuropeN.V. Procter & GambleBelgium

Personalised recommendations