Lifecycle inventory: a part of lifecycle assessment

  • P. White
  • M. Franke
  • P. Hindle


Lifecycle assessment (LCA) is introduced. It is a tool to predict the overall environmental impact of a product or service. It consists of four stages: goal definition, inventory, impact analysis and valuation, of which the first two are well developed and the latter two in need of further work. In view of this, the analysis of solid waste management will be limited to a lifecycle inventory (LCI) (comprising goal definition and inventory stages) and not involve a detailed impact analysis or valuation. Economic lifecycle assessment is an equally important, although separate, part of an overall assessment.


Solid Waste Impact Category Global Warming Potential Impact Analysis Ozone Depletion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahbe, S., Braunschweig, A. and Müller-Wenk, R. (1990) Methodik für Oekobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Report No. 133. Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  2. Assies, J.A. (1992) State of art. In Life-Cycle Assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry — Europe (SETAC), Brussels, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Boustead, I. (1993) Resource Use and Liquid Food Packaging. EC Directive 85/339: UK Data 1986–1990. A report for INCPEN.Google Scholar
  4. Boustead, I. and Hancock, G.F. (1989) EEC Directive 85/339. UK Data 1986. A report for INCPEN (Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment). The Open University, UK.Google Scholar
  5. BUS (1984) EMPA (1984). Oekobilanzen von Packstoffen. Bundesamt für Umweltschutz, Report No. 24. Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. EC (1992) Ecolabelling regulation. Off. J. Eur. Commun. L99 (1992).Google Scholar
  7. EC (1993) Draft Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive.Google Scholar
  8. Elkington et al. (1993) The LCA Sourcebook. SustainAbility, SPOLD and Business in the Environment, 112 pp.Google Scholar
  9. ENDS (1991) P & G throws down gauntlet on aerosols with propellant-free refillable sprays. Environ. Data Services Rep. 199, 23–24.Google Scholar
  10. Finnveden, G., Andersson-Sköld, Y., Samuelsson, M.-O., Zetterberg, L. and Lindfors, L.-G. (1992) Classification (impact analysis) in connection with lifecycle assessments — a preliminary study. In Product Lifecycle Assessment — Principles and Methodology. Nordic Council of Ministers, 172–231.Google Scholar
  11. Franke, M. (1983) Umweltauswirkungen durch Getraenkeverpackungen — Systematik zur Ermittlung von Umweltauswirkungen am Beispiel der Mehrweg-Glasflasche und des Getraenkekartons. E. Freitag Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Guinée, J.B. (1992) Headings for classification. In Life-Cycle Assessment. Report of the SETAC Workshop, Leiden. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels, pp. 81–85.Google Scholar
  13. Habersatter, K. (1991) Oekobilanz von Packstoffen Stand 1990, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL) Report No. 132, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. Hindle, P., White, P.R. and Minion, K. (1993) Achieving real environmental improvement using value: impact assessment. Long Range Planning 26(3), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt, R.G., Franklin, W.E., Welch, R.O., Cross, J.A. and Woodal, A.E. (1974) Resource and Environmental Profile Analysis of Nine Beverage Container Alternatives. Midwest Research Institute for US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, R.G., Sellers, J.D. and Franklin, W.E. (1992) Resource and environmental profile analysis: a life cycle environmental assessment for products and procedures. Environ. Impact Assessment Rev. 12, 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huppes, G. (1992) Allocating impacts of multiple economic processes in LCA. In Life-Cycle Assessment. Report of the SETAC Workshop, Leiden. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar
  18. Landbank (1991) Packaging — An Environmental Perspective. A Gateway Foodmarkets report prepared by Landbank Consultancy, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Procter & Gamble (1992) Lifecycle inventory for consumer goods packages. A copy of this spreadsheet can be obtained from Procter and Gamble European Technical Center, Temselaan 100, B-1853 Strombeek-Bever, Belgium.Google Scholar
  20. SETAC (1992) Life-Cycle Assessment. Report of the SETAC Workshop, Leiden, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar
  21. Thomé-Kozmiensky, K.J. and Franke, M. (1988) Umweltauswirkungen von Verpackungen aus Kunststoff und Glas. EF-Verlag fuer Energie- und Umwelttechnik, Berlin.Google Scholar
  22. Tillman, A.-M., Baumann, H., Eriksson, E. and Rydberg, T. (1991) Lifecycle analyses of selected packaging materials, report commissioned by Swedish National Commission on Packaging (draft).Google Scholar
  23. Udo de Haes, H.A. (1992) Workshop conclusions on classification session. In Life-Cycle Assessment. Report of the SETAC Workshop, Leiden. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels, pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
  24. White, P.R., Hindle, P. and Dräger, K. (1993) Lifecycle assessment of packaging. In Packaging in the Environment, ed. G. Levy. Blackie, Glasgow, pp. 118–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. White
    • 1
  • M. Franke
    • 2
  • P. Hindle
    • 3
  1. 1.Procter & Gamble Ltd.UK
  2. 2.Procter & Gamble GmbHGermany
  3. 3.Environmental Quality - EuropeN.V. Procter & GambleBelgium

Personalised recommendations