Integrated waste management

  • P. White
  • M. Franke
  • P. Hindle


This chapter discusses the needs of society: less waste, and then an effective way to manage the inevitable waste still produced. Such a waste management system needs to be both environmentally and economically sustainable and is likely to be integrated, market-oriented, flexible and operated on a regional scale. The current hierarchy of waste management options is critically discussed, and in its place is suggested a holistic approach that assesses the overall environmental impacts and economic costs of the whole system. Lifecycle techniques are introduced for comparing the overall environmental impacts and economic costs.


Waste Management Anaerobic Digestion Energy Recovery Waste Management System Waste Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boustead, I. (1992) The relevance of re-use and recycling activities for the LCA profile of products. Proc, 3rd CESIO International Surfactants Congress and Exhibition, London, pp. 218–226.Google Scholar
  2. Clark R.M. (1978) Analysis of Urban Solid Waste ServicesA Systems Approach. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  3. Elkington, J. and Hailes, J. (1988) The Green Consumer Guide. Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
  4. ERRA (1991) Resource. Report of European Recovery and Recycling Association, 1991. ERRA, Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. Greenberg, M., Caruana, J. and Krugman, B. (1976) Solid-waste management: a test of alternative strategies using optimization techniques. Environ. Planning 8, 587–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hindle, P., White, P.R. and Minion, K. (1993) Achieving real environmental improvement using value: impact accessment. Long Range Planning 26(3), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IGD (1994), Environmental impact management. Report by A. Hindle for Policy Issues Programme of the lnsitute for Grocery Distribution, Watford, UK, 65 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Oakland, J.S. (1989) Total Quality Management. Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 316 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (1992) Packaging waste and the polluter pays principle — a taxation solution Working paper. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London, 20 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Schmidt, S. and Krivit, D. (1992) Variable fee systems in Minnesota. Biocycle September, 50–53.Google Scholar
  11. Sushil (1990) Waste management: a systems perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems 90 (5), 7–66.Google Scholar
  12. Warmer, (1990) The packaging puzzle. Warmer Bull. 25, 14–15.Google Scholar
  13. WCED (1987) Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. White, P.R. (1993) Waste-to-energy technology within integrated waste management. In Proc. Cost Effective Power and Steam Generation from the Incineration of Waste. Institute of Mechanical Engineers Seminar, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. White
    • 1
  • M. Franke
    • 2
  • P. Hindle
    • 3
  1. 1.Procter & Gamble Ltd.UK
  2. 2.Procter & Gamble GmbHGermany
  3. 3.Environmental Quality - EuropeN.V. Procter & GambleBelgium

Personalised recommendations