Molecular Recognition Strategies II: (A)BC Excinuclease

  • Hanspeter Naegeli
Part of the Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit book series (MBIU)


All DNA repair mechanisms illustrated in the previous chapter (operating either by DNA damage reversal or by base excision repair) achieve their selectivity for damaged sites through noncovalent interactions between complementary surfaces. These binary DNA repair systems are initiated by specific enzymes (DNA photolyases, alkyltransferases, glycosylases) that bind a narrow range of lesions, i.e., a particular type of base damage, thereby excluding nondamaged DNA from being processed. For example, the substrate binding pocket of uracil-DNA glycosylase accommodates uracil and a few uracil derivatives, but efficiently rejects adenine, cytosine or thymine. Thus, the recognition strategy used in such repair systems is highly selective for damaged DNA, is efficient and (with exception of the “suicidal” O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) of low energetic cost,1 but limits dramatically the spectrum of lesions that can be recognized and processed by a given pathway.


Excision Repair Nucleotide Excision Repair Base Excision Repair Damage Recognition Interstrand Crosslinks 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sancar A, Tang M-s. Nucleotide excision repair. Photochem Photobiol 1993; 57:905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Houten B. Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coll. Microbiol Rev 1990; 54:18–51.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanawalt PC, Cooper PK, Ganesan AK et al. DNA repair in bacteria and mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem 1979; 48:783–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanawalt PC. “Close-fitting sleeves”-Rec-ognition of structural defects in duplex DNA. Mutat Res 1993; 289:7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grossman L, Thiangalingam S. Nucleotide excision repair, a tracking mechanism in search of damage. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:16871–16874.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sancar A. DNA excision repair. Annu Rev Biochem 1996; 65:43–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin J-J, Sancar A. (A)BC excinuclease: the Escherichia coli nucleotide excision repair enzyme. Mol Microbiol 1992; 6:2219–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang J-C, Svoboda DL, Reardon JT et al. Human nucleotide excision nuclease removes thymine dimers from DNA by incising the 22nd phosphodiester bond 5′ and the 6th phosphodiester bond 3′ to the photodimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:3664–3668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanaka K, Wood RD. Xeroderma pigmentosum and nucleotide excision repair. Trends Biochem Sci 1994; 19:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoeijmakers JHJ. Nucleotide excision repair II: from yeast to mammals. Trends Genet Sci 1993; 9:211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coverley D, Kenny MK, Munn M et al. Requirement for the replication protein SSB in human DNA excision repair. Nature 1991; 349:538–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heyer W-D, Rao MRS, Erdile LF et al. An essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-stranded DNA binding protein is homologous to the large subunit of human R-PA. EMBO J 1990; 9:2321–2329.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li R, Botchan M. The acidic transcriptional activation domain of VP16 and p53 bind the cellular RPA and stimulate in vitro BPV-1 DNA replication. Cell 1993; 73:1207–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaeffer L, Roy R, Humbert S et al. DNA repair helicase: a component of BTF2 (TFIIH) basic transcription factor. Science 1993; 260:58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sancar A, Franklin KA, Sancar GB. Escherichia coli DNA photolyase stimulates UvrABC excision nuclease in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:7397–7401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Selby CP, Witkin EM, Sancar A. Escherichia coli mfd mutant deficient in “mutation frequency decline” lacks strand-specific repair: in vitro complementation with purified coupling factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:11574–11578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sancar A, Rupp WD. A novel repair enzyme: UVRABC excision nuclease of Escherichia coli cuts a DNA strand on both sides of the damaged region. Cell 1983; 33:249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh EY, Grossman E. The effect of Escherichia coli Uvr protein binding on the topology of supercoiled DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1986; 14:8557–8571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mazur SJ, Grossman L. Dimerization of Escherichia coli UvrA and its binding to undamaged and ultraviolet light damaged DNA. Biochemistry 1991; 30:4432–4443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orren DK, Sancar A. The (A)BC excinuclease of Escherichia coli has only the UvrB and UvrC subunits in the incision complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:5237–5241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orren DK, Sancar A. Formation and enzymatic properties of the UvrB DNA complex. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:15796–15803.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oh EY, Grossman L. Characterization of the helicase activity of the Escherichia coli Uvr AB protein complex. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:1336–1343.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koo H-S, Classen L, Grossman L et al. ATP-dependent partitioning of the DNA template into supercoiled domains by Escherichia coli UvrAB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:1212–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moolenar GF, Visse R, Ortiz-Buysse M et al. Helicase motifs V and VI of the Escherichia coli UvrB protein of the UvrABC endonuclease are essential for the formation of the preincision complex. J Mol Biol 1994; 240:294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Backendorf C, Spaink H, Barbiero AP et al. Structure of the uvrB gene of E. coli, homology with DNA repair enzymes and characterization of uvrB5 mutation. Nucleic Acids Res 1986; 14:2877–2890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seeley TW, Grossman L. The role of the E. coli UvrB in nucleotide excision repair. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:7158–7165.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Orren DK, Selby CP, Hearst JE et al. Post-incision steps of nucleotide excision repair in E. coli: disassembly of the UvrBC-DNA complex by helicase II and DNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:780–788.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van Houten B, Gamper H, Sancar A et al. DNase I footprint of ABC excinuclease. J Biol Chem 1987; 262:13180–13187.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertrand-Burggraf E, Selby CP, Hearst JE et al. Identification of the different intermediates in the interaction of (A)BC excinuclease with its substrate by DNase I footprinting on two uniquely modified oligonucleotides. J Mol Biol 1991; 218:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shi Q, Thresher R, Sancar A et al. An electron microscopic study of (A)BC excinuclease. J Mol Biol 1992; 226:425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lin J-J, Phillips AM, Hearst JE et al. Active site of (A)BC excinuclease II. Binding, bending, and catalysis mutants of UvrB reveal a direct role in 3′ and an indirect role in 5′ incision. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:17693–17700.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lin J-J, Sancar A. Active site of (A)BC excinuclease I. Evidence for 5′ incision by UvrC through a catalytic site involving Asp399, Asp438, Asp466, and His538 residues. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:17688–17692.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zou Y, Liu T-M, Geacintov NE et al. Interaction of the UvrABC nuclease system with a DNA duplex containing a single stereoisomer of dG-(+)-or dG(-)-anti-BPDE. Biochemistry 1995; 34:13582–13593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moolenar GF, Franken KLMC, Dijkstra DM et al. The C-terminal region of UvrB protein of Escherichia coli contains an important determinant for UvrC binding to the preincision complex but not the catalytic site for 3′-incision. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:30508–30515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohen C and Parry DA. Alpha-helical coiled coils and bundles: how to design an alpha-helical protein. Proteins 1990; 7:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Glover JN, Harrison SC. Crystal structure of the heterodimeric bZIP transcription factor c-Fos-c-Jun bound to DNA. Nature 1995; 373:257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sancar A, Hearst JE. Molecular matchmakers. Science 1993; 259:1415–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van Houten B, Snowden A. Mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli UvrABC nuclease: clues to the damage recognition problem. BioEssays 1993; 15:51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grossman L, Yeung AT. The UvrABC endonuclease system of Escherichia coli-a view from Baltimore. Mutat Res 1990; 236:213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walter RB, Pierce J, Case R et al. Recognition of the DNA helix stabilizing anthramycin-N2-guanine adduct by UVRABC nuclease. J Mol Biol 1988; 203:939–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ramaswamy M, Yeung JE. Sequence-specific interactions of UvrABC endonuclease with psoralen interstrand crosslinks. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:485–492.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Snowden A, Van Houten B. Initiation of the UvrABC nuclease cleavage reaction: extent of incisions is not correlated with UvrA binding affinity. J Mol Biol 1991; 220:19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Visse R, van Gool AJ, Moolenaar GF et al. The actual incision determines the efficiency of repair of cisplatin damaged DNA by the Escherichia coli UvrABC endonuclease. Biochemistry 1994; 33:1804–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang JC, Giaever GN. Action at a distance along a DNA. Science 1988; 240:300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Oh EY, Grossman L. Helicase properties of the Escherichia coli UvrAB protein complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84:3638–3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Spielmann HP, Dwyer TJ, Sastry SS et al. DNA structural reorganization upon conversion of a psoralen furan-side monoadduct to an interstrand cross-link: implications for DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:2345–2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Spielmann HP, Dwyer TJ, Hearst JE et al. Solution structure of psoralen monoadducted and cross-linked DNA oligomers by NMR spectroscopy and restrained molecular dynamics. Biochemistry 1995; 34:12937–12953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Van Houten B, Illenye S, Qu Y et al. Homodinuclear (Pt, Pt) and heterodinuclear (Ru, Pt) metal compounds as DNA-protein cross-linking agents: potential suicide DNA lesions. Biochemistry 1993; 32:11794–11801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hsu DS, Kim S-T, Sun Q et al. Structure and function of UvrB. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:8319–8327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hanawalt PC, Haynes R. Repair replication of DNA in bacteria: irrelevance of chemical nature of base defect. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1965; 19:462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© R.G. Landes Company 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanspeter Naegeli
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of Zürich-TierspitalZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations