DNA Structure: Inherent Instability and Genotoxic Reactions

  • Hanspeter Naegeli
Part of the Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit book series (MBIU)


The principal goal of this chapter is to provide examples of biologically significant lesions in DNA that are (1) chemically and structurally well characterized and (2) serve as experimental models to understand how DNA damage is recognized in mammalian chromosomes.


Nitric Oxide Sulfur Mustard Abasic Site Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer Inherent Instability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Stryer L. Biochemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1988:71–78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular structure of nucleic acid. A structure for deoxyribose acid. Nature 1953; 171:737–738.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson JD, Crick FHC. Genetic implications of the structure of deoxyribo-nucleic acid. Nature 1953; 171:964–967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sancar A. Mechanisms of DNA excision repair. Science 1994; 266: 1954–1956Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunderdale HJ, West SC. Recombination genes and proteins. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1994; 4:221–228.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Houten B. Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 1990; 54:18–51.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 1993; 362:709–715.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindahl T, Nyberg B. Rate of depurination of native deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 1972; 11:3610–3618.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindahl T, Andersson A. Rate of chain breakage at apurinic sites in doublestranded deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 1972; 11:3618–3623.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demple B, Herman T, Chen DS. Cloning and expression of APE, the cDNA encoding the major human apurinic endonuclease: definition of a family of DNA repair enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:11450–11454.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robson CN, Hickson ID. Isolation of cDNA clones encoding a human apurinic/ apyrimidinic endonuclease that corrects DNA repair and mutagenesis defects in E. coli xth (exonuclease III) mutants. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:5519–5523.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doetsch PW, Cunningham RP. The enzymology of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases. Mutat Res 1990; 236:173–201.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindahl T, Nyberg B. Heat-induced deamination of cytosine residues in deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 1974; 13:3405–3410.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindahl T. DNA glycosylases, endonucleases for apurinic/apyrimidinic sites, and base excision-repair. Progr Nucleic Acid Res Molec Biol 1979; 22:135–192.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehrlich M, Zhang X-Y, Inamdar NM. Spontaneous deamination of cytosine and 5-methylcytosine residues in DNA and replacement of 5-methylcytosine residues with cytosine residues. Mutat Res 1990; 238:277–286.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dianov G, Price A, Lindahl T. Generation of single-nucleotide repair patches following excision of uracil residues from DNA. Mol Cell Biol 1992; 12:1605–1612.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiricny J. Colon cancer and DNA repair: have mismatches met their match? Trends Genet 1994; 10:164–168.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cooper DN, Youssoufian H. The CpG dinucleotide and human disease. Hum Genet 1988; 78:151–155.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frederico LA, Kunkel TA, Shaw BR. A sensitive genetic assay for the detection of cytosine deamination: determination of rate constants and the activation energy. Biochemistry 1990; 29:2532–2537.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mosbaugh DW, Bennett SE. Uracil-excision DNA repair. Progr Nucleic Acid Res Molec Biol 1994; 48:315–370.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen H, Shaw BR. Bisulfite induces tandem double CC→TT mutations in double-stranded DNA. 2. Kinetics of cytosine deamination. Biochemistry 1994; 33:4121–4129.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peng W, Shaw BR. Accelerated deamination of cytosine residues in UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers leads to CC→TT transitions. Biochemistry 1996; 35:10172–10181.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verri A, Mazzarello P, Biamonti G et al. The specific binding of nuclear protein(s) to the cAMP responsive element (CRE) sequence (TGACGTCA) is reduced by the misincorporation of U and increased by the deamination of C. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18:5775–5780.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karran P, Lindahl T. Hypoxanthine in deoxyribonucleic acid: generation by heatinduced hydrolysis of adenine residues and release in free form by a deoxyribonucleic acid glycosylase from calf thymus. Biochemistry 1980; 19:6005–6011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schuster H. The reaction of nitrous acid with deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1960; 2:320–323.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wink DA, Kasprzak KS, Maragos CM, et al. DNA deamination ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors. Science 1991; 254:1001–1003.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nguyen T, Brunson D, Crespi CL et al. DNA damage and mutation in human cells exposed to nitric oxide in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:3030–3034.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dianov G, Lindahl T. Preferential recognition of IT base-pairs in the initiation of excision-repair by hypoxanthine-DNA glycosylase. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:3829–3833.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ames BN, Shinegaga MK, Hagen TM. Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:7915–7922.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marnett LJ, Burcham PC. Endogenous DNA adducts: potential and paradox. Chem Res Toxicol 1993; 6:771–785.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee AT, Cerami A. Elevated glucose 6-phosphate levels are associated with plasmid mutations in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84:8311–8314.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Demple B, Harrison L. Repair of oxidative damage to DNA: enzymology and biology. Annu Rev Biochem 1994; 63:915–948.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    von Sonntag C. The Chemical Basis of Radiation Biology. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd, 1987.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Imlay JA, Linn S. DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity. Science 1988; 240:1302–1309.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ames BN, Gold LS. Endogenous mutagens and the causes of aging and cancer. Mutat Res 1991; 250:3–16.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dizdaroglu M. Oxidative damage to DNA in mammalian chromatin. Mutat Res 1992; 275:331–342.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kasai H, Nishimura S. Hydroxylation of deoxyguanosine at the C-8 position by ascorbic acid and other reducing agents. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984; 12:2137–2145.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shibutani S, Takeshita M, Grollman A. Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG. Nature 1991; 349:431–434.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tchou J, Kasai H, Shibutani S et al. 8-Oxoguanine (8-hydroxyguanine) DNA glycosylase and its substrate specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:4690–4694.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, Dizdaroglu M. Iron ion-dependent modification of bases in DNA by the Superoxide radical generating system hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:13024–13028.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hariharan PV, Cerutti PA. Formation of products of the 5,6-dihydroxydihydrothymine type by ultraviolet light in HeLa cells. Biochemistry 1977; 16:2791–2795.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boiteux S, O’Connor TR, Laval J. Formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase of Escherichia coli: cloning and sequencing of the fpg structural gene and overproduction of the protein. EMBO J 1987; 6:3177–3183.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Demple B, Linn S. DNA N-glycosylases and UV repair. Nature 1980; 287:203–208.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Giloni L, Takeshita M, Johnson F et al. Bleomycin-induced strand-scission of DNA. Mechanism of deoxyribose cleavage. J Biol Chem 1981, 256:8608–8615.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Henner WD, Grunberg SM, Haseltine WA. Enzyme action at 3‹ termini of ionizing radiation-induced DNA strand breaks. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:15198–15205.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shapiro R. Damage to DNA caused by hydrolysis. In: Seeberg E, Kleppe K, eds. Chromosome Damage and Repair. New York: Plenum Press, 1981:3–18.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    West SC. Enzymes and molecular mechanisms of genetic recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 1992; 61:603–640.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chance B, Sies H, Boveris A. Hydroxyperoxide metabolism in mammalian organs. Physiol Rev 1979; 59:527–605.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chen Q, Fischer A, Reagan JD et al. Oxidative DNA damage and senescence of human diploid fibroblast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:4337–4341.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chanock SJ, El Benna J, Smith RM. The respiratory burst oxidase. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:24519–24522.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Baik SC, Youn HS, Chung MH et al. Increased oxidative damage in Helicobacter pylori-infected human gastric mucosa. Cancer Res 1996; 56:1279–1282.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kiyosawa H, Suko M, Okudaira H et al. Cigarette smoking induces formation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, one of the oxidative DNA damages in human peripheral leukocytes. Free Radical Res Comm 1990; 11:23–27.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Frei B. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant vitamins: mechanisms of action. Am J Med 1994; 97(3A):5S–13S.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reznick AZ, Cross CE, Hu M-L et al. Modification of plasma proteins by cigarette smoke as measured by protein carbonyl formation. Biochem J 1992; 286:607–611.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bui MH, Sauty A, Collet F et al. Dietary vitamin C intake and concentrations in the body fluids and cells of male smokers and nonsmokers. J Nutr 1991; 122:312–316.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kappus H, Sies H. Toxic drug effects associated with oxygen metabolism: redox cycling and lipid peroxidation. Experientia 1981; 37:1233–1241.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    LaRusso NF, Tomasz M, Müller M et al. Interaction of metronidazole with nucleic acids in vitro. Mol Pharmacol 1977; 13:872–882.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Caspary WJ, Niziak C, Lanzo DA et al. Bleomycin A2: a ferrous oxidase. Mol Pharmacol 1979; 16:256–260.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Garthwaite J, Charles SL, Chess-Williams R. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain. Nature 1988; 336:385–388.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bredt DS, Hwang PM, Snyder SH. Localization of nitric oxide synthase indicating a neural role for nitric oxide. Nature 1990; 347:768–770.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Beckman JS, Beckman TW, Chen J et al. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:1620–1624.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Singer B, Grunberger D. Molecular Biology of Mutagens and Carcinogens, New York: Plenum Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Larson K, Sahm J, Shenkar R et al. Methylation-induced blocks to in vitro DNA replication. Mutat Res 1985; 150:77–84.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Saffhill R, Margison GP, O’Connor PJ. Mechanisms of carcinogenesis induced by alkylating agents. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985; 823:111–145.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    O’Connor TR, Boiteux S, Laval J. Ringopened 7-methylguanine residues in DNA are a block to in vitro DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16:5879–5894.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tudek B, Boiteux S, Laval J. Biological properties of imidazole ring-opened N 7-methylguanine in M13mp18 phage DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1992; 20:3079–3084.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Loveless A. Possible relevance of O 6-alkylation of deoxyguanosine to mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of nitrosamines and nitrosamides. Nature 1969; 233:206–207.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Loechler EL, Green CL, Essigmann JM. In vivo mutagenesis by O 6-methylguanine built into a unique site in a viral genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:6271–6275.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Singer B, Chavez F, Goodman MF et al. Effect of 3’ flanking neighbors on kinetics of pairing of dCTP or dTTP opposite O 6-methylguanine in a defined primed oligonucleotide when Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I is used. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:8271–8274.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Preston BD, Singer B, Loeb LA. Mutagenic potential of O 4-methylthymine in vivo determined by an enzymatic approach to site-specific mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83:8501–8505.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Preston BD, Singer B, Loeb LA. Comparison of the relative mutagenicities of O-alkylthymines site-specifically incorporated into φX174 DNA. J Biol Chem 1987; 262:13821–13827.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kat A, Thilly WG, Fang WH et al. An alkylation-tolerant, mutator human cell line is deficient in strand-specific mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:6424–6428.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Branch P, Aquilina G, Bignami M et al. Defective mismatch binding and a mutator phenotype in cells tolerant to DNA damage. Nature 1993; 362:652–654.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rydberg B, Lindahl T. Nonenzymatic methylation of DNA by the intracellular methyl group donor S-adenosyl-L-methionine is a potentially mutagenic reaction. EMBO J. 1982; 1:211–216.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Barrows LR, Magee PN. Nonenzymatic methylation of DNA by S-adenosylmethionine in vitro. Carcinogenesis 1982; 3:349–351.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Park J-W, Ames BN. 7-Methylguanine adducts in DNA are normally present at high levels and increase on aging: analysis by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:7467–7470.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tan BH, Bencsath FA, Gaubatz JW. Steady-state levels of 7-methylguanine increase in nuclear DNA of postmitotic mouse tissues during aging. Mutat Res 1990; 237:229–238.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Prévost V, Shuker DE, Friesen MD et al. Immunoaffinity purification and gas-chromatography-mass spectrometric quantification of 3-alkylated adenines in urine: metabolism studies and basal excretion levels in man. Carcinogenesis 1993; 14:199–204.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lawley PD. Methylation of DNA by carcinogens: some applications of chemical analytical methods. In: Montesano R, Bartsch H, Tomatis L, eds. Screening Tests in Chemical Carcinogenesis. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications, 1976:181–210.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Zak P, Kleibl K, Laval F. Repair of O 6-methylguanine and O 4-methylthymine by the human and rat O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:730–733.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sakumi K, Sekiguchi M. Structures and functions of DNA glycosylases. Mutat Res 1990; 236:161–172.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Huang J-C, Hsu DS, Kazanzsev A et al. Substrate spectrum of human excinuclease: repair of abasic sites, methylated bases, mismatches, and bulky adducts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:12213–12217.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Swenberg JA, Dyroff MC, Bedell MA et al. O 4-Ethyldeoxythymidine, but not O 6-ethyldeoxyguanosine, accumulates in hepatocyte DNA of rats exposed continuously to diethylnitrosamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:1692–1695.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Davies RJH. Ultraviolet radiation damage in DNA. Biochem Soc Trans 1995; 23:407–418.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mitchell DL. The relative cytotoxicity of (6-4) photoproducts and cyclobutane dimers in mammalian cells. Photochem Photobiol 1988; 48:51–57.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sage E. Distribution and repair of photolesions in DNA: genetic consequences and the role of sequence context. Photochem Photobiol 1993; 57:163–174.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lubin D, Jensen EH. Effects of clouds and stratospheric ozone depletion on ultraviolet radiation trends. Nature 1995; 377:710–713.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Madronich S, de Gruijl FR. Skin cancer and UV radiation. Nature 1993; 366:23.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Varghese AJ. Photochemistry of nucleic acids and their constituents. Photophysiology 1972; 7:207–274.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mitchell DL, Jen J, Cleaver JE. Relative induction of cyclobutane dimers and cytosine photohydrates in DNA irradiated in vitro and in vivo with ultraviolet-C and ultraviolet-B light. Photochem Photobiol 1991; 54:741–746.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bose SN, Davies RJ, Sethi SK et al. Formation of an adenine-thymine photoadduct in the deoxydinucleoside monophosphate d(TpA) and in DNA. Science 1983; 220:723–725.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Zhao X, Taylor J-S. Mutation spectra of TA*, the major photoproduct of thymidylyl-(3′-5′)-deoxyadenosine, in Escherichia coli under SOS conditions. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24:1561–1565.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kumar S, Joshi PC, Sharma ND et al. Adenine photodimerization in deoxyadenylate sequences: elucidation of the mechanism through structural studies of a major d(ApA) photoproduct. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:2841–2847.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Mitchell DL, Nairn RS. The biology of the (6-4) photoproduct. Photochem Photobiol 1989; 49:805–819.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Chan GL, Doetsch PW, Haseltine WA. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4) photoproducts block polymerization by DNA polymerase I. Biochemistry 1985; 24:5723–5728.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gentil A, Le Page F, Lawrence CW et al. Mutagenicity of a unique thymine-thymine dimer or thymine-thymine pyrimidine pyrimidone (6-4) photoproduct in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24:1837–1840.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lebkowski JS, Clancy S, Miller JH et al. The lacI shuttle: rapid analysis of the mutagenic specificity of ultraviolet light in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82:8606–8610.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Dumaz N, Drougard C, Sarasin A et al. Specific UV-induced mutation spectrum in the p53 gene of skin tumors from DNA-repair-deficient xeroderma pigmentosum patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:10529–10533.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Reid TM, Loeb LA. Tandem double CC→TT mutations are produced by reactive oxygen species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:3904–3907.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Kim ST, Sancar A. Photochemistry, photophysics, and mechanism of pyrimidine dimer repair by DNA photolyase. Photochem Photobiol 1993; 57:895–904.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Todo T, Takemori H, Ryo H et al. A new photoreactivating enzyme that specifically repairs ultraviolet light-induced (6-4) photoproducts. Nature 1993; 361:371–374.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Friedberg EC, King JJ. Endonucleolytic cleavage of UV-irradiated DNA controlled by the V + gene in phage T4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1969; 37:646–651.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Takao M, Yonemasu R, Yamamoto K et al. Characterization of a UV endonuclease gene from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and its bacterial homolog. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24:1267–1271.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Sancar A. DNA excision repair. Annu Rev Biochem 1996; 65:43–81.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Bruls WA, Slaper H, van der Leun JC et al. Transmission of human epidermis and stratum corneum as a function of thickness in the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths. Photochem Photobiol 1984; 40:485–494.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Tyrell RM, Keyse SM. New trends in photobiology. The interaction of UVA radiation with cultured cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 1990; 4:349–361.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Epe B, Pflaum M, Boiteux S. DNA damage induced by photosensitizers in cellular and cell-free systems. Mutat. Res. 1993; 299:135–145.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Epe B. Genotoxicity of singlet oxygen. Chem Biol Interactions 1991; 80:239–260.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    McCormick JP, Fischer JR, Pachlatko JP et al. Characterization of a cell-lethal product from the photooxidation of tryptophan: hydrogen peroxide. Science 1976; 191:468–469.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Sterenborg HJCM, van der Leun JC. Tumorigenesis by a long wavelength UV-A source. Photochem Photobiol 1990; 4:349–361.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Drobetsky EA, Turcotte J, Châteauneuf A. A role for ultraviolet A in solar mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:2350–2354.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Garland CF, Garland FC, Gorham ED. Rising trends in melanoma. A hypothesis concerning sunscreen effectiveness. Ann Epidemiol 1993; 3:103–110.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wallace SS, Painter RB, eds. Ionizing Radiation Damage to DNA: Molecular Aspects. Proceedings of a Radiation Society-UCLA Symposia Colloquium. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Randerath K, Reddy MV, Gupta RC. 32P-Labeling test for DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:6126–6129.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Perera FP, Hemminki K, Gryzbowska E et al. Molecular and genetic damage in humans from environmental pollution in Poland. Nature 1992; 360:256–258.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Lawley PD. Effects of some chemical mutagens and carcinogens on nucleic acids. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1966; 5:89–131.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Pegg AE. DNA repair and carcino genesis by alkylating agents. In: Cooper CS, Grover PL, eds. Chemical Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990:103–131.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Lawley PD. Carcinogenesis by alkylating agents. In: Searle CE, ed. Chemical Carcinogenesis, ACS Monograph 182. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1984:325–484.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Haddow A. The chemical and genetic mechanisms of carcinogenesis. In: Homburger F, Fishman WH, eds. The Physiopathology of Cancer. New York: Hoeber, 1953:475–551.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Basu AK, Essigmann JM. DNA damage: structural and functional consequences. In: Vos J-M H, ed. DNA Repair Mechanisms: Impact on Human Diseases and Cancer. Austin: RG Landes, 1995:1–24.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Patrianakos C, Hoffmann D. Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXIV. On the analysis of aromatic amines in cigarette smoke. J Anal Toxicol 1979; 3:150–154.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Rosenkranz HS, McCoy EC, Sanders DR et al. Nitropyrenes: isolation, identification, and reduction of mutagenic impurities in carbon black and toners. Science 1980; 209:1039–1043.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Sugimura T. Past, present and future of mutagens in cooked foods. Environ Health Perspect 1986; 67:5–10.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Miller JA, Miller EC. Metabolic activation of carcinogenic aromatic amines and amides via N-hydroxylation and N-hydroxy esterification and its relationship to ultimate carcinogens as electrophilic reactants. In: Bergmann ED, Pullman B, eds. The Jerusalem Symposia on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry, Physicochemical Mechanism of Carcinogenesis. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1969:237–261.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Humphreys WG, Kadlubar FF, Guengerich FP. Mechanisms of C8 alkylation of guanine residues by activated arylamines: evidence for initial adduct formation at the N 7 position. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:8278–8282.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Kriek E. Fifty years of research on N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene, one of the most versatile compounds in experimental cancer research. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1992; 118:481–489.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Gupta RC, Dighe NR. Formation and removal of DNA adducts in rat liver treated with N-hydroxy derivatives of 2-acetylaminofluorene, 4-acetylaminobiphenyl, and 2-acetylaminophenanthrene. Carcinogenesis 1984; 5:343–349.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Poirier MC, Ture B, Laishes BA. Formation and removal of (guan-8-yl)-DNA-2-acetylaminofluorene adducts in liver and kidney of male rats given dietary 2-acetylaminofluorene. Cancer Res 1982; 42:1317–1321.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Bichara M, Fuchs RP. DNA binding and mutation spectra of the carcinogen N-2-aminofluorene in Escherichia coli. A correlation between the conformation of the premutagenic lesion and the mutation specificity. J Mol Biol 1985; 183:341–351.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Carothers AM, Urlaub G, Mucha J et al. A mutational hot spot induced by N-hydroxy-aminofluorene in dihydrofolate reductase mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Carcinogenesis 1993; 14:2181–2184.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Mah MC, Maher VM, Thomas H et al. Mutations induced by aminofluorene-DNA adducts during replication in human cells. Carcinogenesis 1989; 10:2321–2328.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Reid TM, Lee M-S, King CM. Mutagenesis by site-specific arylamine adducts in plasmid DNA: enhancing replication of the adducted strand alters mutation frequency. Biochemistry 1990; 29:6153–6161.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Shibutani S, Grollman AP. On the mechanism of frameshift (deletion) mutagenesis in vitro. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:11703–11710.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Eckel LM, Krugh TR. 2-Aminofluorene modified DNA duplex exists in two interchangeable conformations. Nature Struct Biol 1994; 1:89–94.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Eckel LM, Krugh TR. Structural characterization of two interchangeable conformations of a 2-aminofluorene-modified DNA oligomer by NMR and energy minimization. Biochemistry 1994; 33:13611–13624.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Cho BP, Beland FA, Marques MM. NMR structural studies of a 15-mer DNA duplex from a ras protooncogene modified with the carcinogen 2-aminofluorene: conformational heterogeneity. Biochemistry 1994; 33:1373–1384.Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Lutgerink JT, Retel J, Westra JG et al. Bypass of the major aminofluorene-DNA adduct during in vivo replication of single-and double-stranded φX174 DNA treated with N-hydroxy-2-aminofluorene. Carcinogenesis 1985; 6:1501–1506.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Michaels ML, Reid TM, King CM et al. Accurate in vitro translesion synthesis by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (large fragment) on a site-specific, aminofluorene-modified oligonucleotide. Carcinogenesis 1991; 12:1641–1646.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    van de Poll ML, Lafleur MV, van Gog et al. N-acetylated and deacetylated 4′-fluoro-4-aminobiphenyl and 4-amino-biphenyl adducts differ in their ability to inhibit DNA replication of singlestranded M13 in vitro and of singlestranded φX174 in Escherichia coli. Carcinogenesis 1992; 13:751–758.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Harvey RG. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Chemistry and Cancer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Min Z, Gill RD, Cortez C. Targeted A→T and G→T mutations induced by site-specific deoxyadenosine and deoxyguanosine adducts, respectively, from the (+)-anti-diol epoxide of dibenz[a,j]anthracene in M13mp7L2. Biochemistry 1996; 35:4128–4138.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Yamagawa K, Ichikawa K. Experimentelle Studie über die Pathogenese der Epithelialgewülste. Mitteilungen Med Fakultät Kaiserl Univ Tokyo 1915; 15:295–344.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Miller EC. Some current perspectives on chemical carcinogenesis in humans and experimental animals: Presidential address. Cancer Res 1978; 38:1479–1496.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Albert RE, Burns FJ. Carcinogenic atmospheric pollutants and the nature of lowlevel risks. In: Hiatt HH, Watson JD, Winston JA, eds. Origins of Human Cancer. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1977:289–292.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Newbold RF, Brookes P. Exceptional mutagenicity of a benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 1976; 261:52–54.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Buening MK, Wislocki PG, Levin W et al. Tumorigenicity of the optical enantiomers of the diastereomeric benzo[a]pyrene 7,8-diol-9,10-epoxides in newborn mice: exceptional activity of (+)-7β,8α-dihydroxy-9α,10α-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo-[a]pyrene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75:5358–5361.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Conney AH. Induction of microsomal enzymes by foreign chemicals and carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Res 1982; 42:4875–4917.Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Meehan T, Straub K, Calvin M. Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide co-valently binds to deoxyguanosine and deoxyadenosine in DNA. Nature 1977; 269:725–727.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Mehan T, Straub K. Double-stranded DNA stereoselectively binds benzo[a]-pyrene diol epoxides. Nature 1979; 277:410–412.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Cheng SC, Hilton BD, Roman JM et al. DNA adducts from carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic enantiomers of benzo[a]pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1989; 2:334–340.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Ames BN, Profet M, Gold LS. Dietary pesticides (99.99% all natural). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:7777–7781.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Busby Jr WF, Wogan GN. Aflatoxins. In: Searle C, ed. Chemical Carcinogens. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1984:945–1136.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Swenson DH, Lin J-K, Miller EC et al. Aflatoxin B1-2,3-oxide as a probable intermediate in the covalent binding of aflatoxin B1 and B2 to rat liver DNA and ribosomal RNA in vivo. Cancer Res 1977; 37:172–181.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Martin CN, Garner CN. Aflatoxin B1 oxide generated by chemical oxidation of aflatoxin B1 causes guanine substitution in nucleic acids. Nature 1977; 267:863–865.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Essigmann JM, Croy RG, Nadzan AM et al. Structural identification of the major DNA adduct formed by aflatoxin B1 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74:1870–1874.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Groopman JD, Croy RG, Wogan GN. In vitro reactions of aflatoxin B1-adducted DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:5445–5449.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Hearst JE, Isaacs ST, Kanne D et al. The reaction of the psoralens with deoxyribonucleic acid. Q Rev Biophys 1984; 17:1–44.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Knobler RM, Hönigsmann H, and Edelson RL. Psoralen phototherapies. In: Gasparro FP, ed. Psoralen DNA Photobiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1988:117–148.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Miller JA, Miller EC. Carcinogens occurring naturally in foods. Federation Proc 1976; 35:1316–1321.Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Carter SK, Crooke ST, Mitomycin C, Current Status and New Developments. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Hurley LH, Petrusek R. Proposed structure of the anthramycin-DNA adduct. Nature 1979; 282:529–531.Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Boger DL, Johnson DS. CC-1065 and the duocarmycins: unraveling the keys to a new class of naturally derived DNA alkylating agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:3642–3649.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© R.G. Landes Company 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanspeter Naegeli
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of Zürich-TierspitalZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations