Intracellular Trafficking of MHC Class II Molecules

  • Alexander Y. Rudensky


CD4 T cells recognize peptides derived from foreign antigens in the context of self MHC class II molecules and as a consequence of positive and negative selection in the thymus are tolerant to peptides derived from self proteins. The primary function of MHC class II molecules is to survey the endocytic compartment of the host cell for antigenic peptides derived from extracellular and intracellular pathogens and communicate this information to CD4 T cells. To achieve this, an elaborate mechanism of the intracellular assembly and transport of MHC class II molecules has evolved. Foreign protein antigens enter the endocytic compartment of an antigen presenting cell (APC) via different routes of uptake including bulk fluid phase uptake, receptor mediated uptake or phagocytosis. Internalized antigens traverse through distinct endosomal subcompartments, i.e., early endosomes, late endosomes and lysosomes where they undergo proteolytic degradation producing antigenic peptides. Early biochemical studies demonstrated that MHC class II molecules intersect the endosomal compartment on their way to the cell surface thereby getting access to antigenic peptides.1 Figure 6.1 represents a simplistic view of endocytic and exocytic routes. The review of structure-functional organization of the endosomal compartment and its interactions with the secretory pathway which has emerged from recent cell biological studies goes beyond the scope of this chapter. I will therefore mainly focus on intracellular trafficking of MHC class II molecules.


Major Histocompatibility Complex Class Intracellular Trafficking Late Endosome Endocytic Pathway Endosomal Compartment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cresswell P. Interacellular class II HLA-antigens are accessible to transferrin-neuraminidase conjugates internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roche PA, Marks MS, Cresswell P. Formation of a nine-subunit complex by HLA class II glycoprotein and the invariant chain. Nature 1991; 354: 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaiserlian D, Vidal K, MacDonald HR et al. Mouse intestinal epithelial cells express the self superantigen Mlsla. Eur J Immunol 1993; 23: 2717–2720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strubin M, Berte C, Mach B. Alternative splicing and alternative initiation of translation explain the four forms of the Ia antigen-associated invariant chain. EMBO 1986; 5: 3483–3488.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Sullivan DM, Noonan D, Quaranta V. Four Ia invariant chain forms derive from a single gene by alternative initiation of transcription/translation. J Exp Med 1987; 166: 444–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koch N, Lauer W, Habicht J et al. Primary structure of the gene for the murine Ia antigen-associated invariant chains (Ii). An alternatively spliced exon encodes a cysteine-rich domain highly homologous to a repetitive sequence of thyroglobulin. EMBO J 1987; 5: 3483–3487.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schaiff WT, Hruska Jr KA, McCourt DW et al. HLA-DR associated with specific stress proteins and is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum in invariant chain negative cells. J Exp Med 1992; 176: 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreiber KL, Bell MP, Huntoon CJ et al. Class II histocompatibility molecules associate with calnexin during assembly in the endoplasmic reticulum. Int Immunol 1994; 6: 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson K, Cresswell P. A role for calnexin (IP90) in the assembly of class II molecules. EMBO J 1995; 13: 675–682.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Germain RN, Rinker AGJ. Peptide binding inhibits protein aggregation of invariant-chain free class II dimers and promotes surface expression of occupied molecules. Nature 1993; 363: 725–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonnerot C, Marks MS, Cosson Pet al. Association with BiP and aggregation of class II MHC molecules synthesized in the absence of invariant chain. EMBO J 1994; 13: 934–944.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Viville S, Neefjes J, Lotteau V et al. Mice lacking the MHC class II-associated invariant chain. Cell 1993; 72: 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bikoff EK, Huang L-Y, Episkopou V et al. Defective major histocompatibility complex class II assembly, transport, peptide acquisition, and CD4’ T cell selection in mice lacking invariant chain expression. J Exp Med 1993; 177: 1699–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elliott EA, Drake JR, Amigorena S et al. The invariant chain is required for intracellular transport and function of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. J Exp Med 1994; 179: 681–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bakke O, Dobberstein B. MHC class II-associated invariant chain contains a sorting signal for endosomal compartments. Cell 1990; 63: 707–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bertolino P, Staschewski M, Trescol-Biemont M-C et al. Deletion of a C-terminal sequence of the class II-associated invariant chain abrogates invariant chains oligomer formation and class II antigen presentation. J Immunol 1995; 154: 5620–5629.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pieters J, Bakke O, Dobberstein B. The MHC class II-associated invariant chain contains two endosomal targeting signals within its cytoplasmic tail. J Cell Sci 1993; 106: 831–846.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Odorizzi CG, Trowbridge IS, Xue L et al. Sorting signals in the MHC class II invariant chain cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane region determine trafficking to an endocytic processing compartment. J Cell Biol 1994; 126: 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roche PA, Teletski CL, Karp DR et al. Stable surface expression of invariant chain prevents peptide presentation by HLA-DR. EMBO J 1992; 11: 2841–2847.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arneson LS, Miller J. Efficient endosomal localization of major histocompatibility complex class II-invariant chain complexes requires multimerization of the invariant chain targeting sequence. J Cell Biol 1995; 129: 1217–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arunachalam B, Lamb CA, Cresswell P. Transport properties of free and MHC class II-associated oligomers containing different isoforms of human invariant chain. Int Immunol 1994; 6: 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peterson M, Miller J. Antigen presentation enhanced by the alternatively spliced invariant chain gene product p41. Nature 1992; 357: 596–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bikoff EK, Germain RN, Robertson EJ. Allelic differences affecting invariant chain dependency of MHC class II subunit assembly. Immunity 1995; 3: 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lamb CA, Yewdell JW, Bennink JR et al. Invariant chain targets HLA class II molecules to acidic endosomes containing internalized influenza virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 5998–6002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simonsen A, Momburg F, Drexler J et al. Intracellular distribution of the MHC class II molecules and the associated invariant chain (Ii) in different cell lines. Int Immunol 1993; 5: 903–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chevronsky AV, Gordon L, Sant AJ. A segment of the MHC Class II beta chain plays a critical role in targeting class II molecules to the endocytic pathway. Int Immunol 1994; 6: 1973–1982.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roche PA, Teleski CL, Stang E et al. Cell surface HLA-DR-invariant chain complexes are targeted to endosomes by rapid internalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 8581–8584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roche PA, Cresswell P. Invariant chain association with HLA-DR molecules inhibits immunogenic peptide binding. Nature 1990; 345: 615–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teyton L, O’Sullivan D, Dickson PW et al. Invariant chain distinguishes between the exogenous and endogenous antigen presentation pathways. Nature 1990; 348: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Newcomb JR, Cresswell P. Characterization of endogenous peptides bound to purified HLA-DR molecules and their absence from invariant chain-associated dimers. J Immunol 1993; 150: 499–507.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bijlmakers M-J JE, Benaroch P, Ploegh HL. Assembly of HLA DR1 molecules translated in vitro: binding of peptide in the endoplasmic reticulum precludes association with invariant chain. EMBO J 1994; 13: 2699–2707.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hedley ML, Urban RG, Strominger JL. Assembly and peptide binding of major histocompatibility complex class II heterodimers in an in vitro translation system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 81: 10479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roche PA, Cresswell P. Proteolysis of the class II associated invariant chain generates a peptide binding site in intracellular HLA-DR molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cresswell P. Assembly, transport and function of MHC class II molecules. Annu Rev Immunol 1994; 12: 259–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blum JS, Cresswell P. Role of intracellular proteases in the processing and transport of class II HLA antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 3975–3980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maric MA, Taylor MD, Blum JS. Endosomal aspartic proteinases are required for invariant-chain processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 2171–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Neefjes JJ, Ploegh HL. Inhibition of endosomal proteolytic activity by leupeptin blocks surface expression of MHC class II molecules and their conversion to SDS resistant alpha/beta hereodimers in endosomes. EMBO J 1992; 11: 411–416.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Loss GEJ, Sant AJ. Invariant, chain retains MHC class II molecules in the endocytic pathway. J Immunol 1993; 150: 3187–3197.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rudensky AY, Preston-Hurlburt P, Hong S-C et al. Sequence analysis of peptides bound to MHC class II molecules. Nature 1991; 353: 622–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hunt DF, Michel H, Dickinson TA et al. Peptides presented to the immune system by the murine class II major histocompatibility molecule I-Ad. Science 1992; 256: 1817–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chicz RM, Urban RG, Gorga JC et al. Predominant naturally processed peptides bound to HLA-DR1 are derived form MHC-related molecules and are heterogeneous in size. Nature 1992; 358: 764–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chicz RM, Urban RG, Gorga JC et al. Specificity and promiscuity among naturally processed peptides bound to HLA-DR alleles. J Exp Med 1993; 178: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Riberdy JM, Newcomb JR, Surman MJ et al. HLA-DR molecules from an antigen-processing mutant cell line are associated with invariant chain peptides. Nature 1992; 360: 474–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sette A, Ceman S, Kubo RT et al. Invariant chain peptides in most HLA-DR molecules of an antigen-processing mutant. Science 1992; 258: 1801–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mellins E, Cameron P, Amaya M et al. A mutant human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen DR molecule associated with invariant chain peptides. J Exp Med 1994; 179: 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Monji T, McCormack AL, Yates III Jr J et al. Invariant chain-cognate peptide exchange restores class II dimer stability in HLA-DM mutants. J Immunol 1994; 153: 4468–4469.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Eastman S, Deftos M, DeRoos PC et al. A study of invariant chain peptide CLIP:MHC class II complexes using new complex-specific monoclonal antibody (submitted).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Freisenwinkel IM, Schenck K, Koch N. The segment of invariant chain that is critical for association with major histocompatibility complex class II molecules contains the sequence of a peptide eluted from class II polypeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 9703–9706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bijlmakers ME, Benaroch P, Ploegh HL. Mapping functional regions in the lumenal domain of the Class II-associated invariant chain. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Romagnoli P, Germain RN. The CLIP region of invariant chain plays a critical role in regulating major histocompatibility complex class II folding, transport, and peptide occupancy. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Malcherek G, Gnau V, Jung G et al. Supermotifs enable natural invariant chain-derived peptides to interact with many major histocompatibility complex-class II molecules. J Exp Med 1995; 181: 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Morkowski S, Goldrath AW, Eastman S et al. T cell recognition of MHC class II complexes with invariant chain processing intermediates. J Exp Med 1995; in press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fling SP, Arp B, Pious D. HLA-DMA and -DMB genes are both required for MHC class II/peptide complex formation in antigen-presenting cells. Nature 1994; 368: 554–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Morris P, Shaman J, Attaya M et al. An essential role for HLA-DM in antigen presentation by class II major histocompatibility molecules. Nature 1994; 368: 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Denzin LK, Robbins NF, Carboy-Newcomb C et al. Assembly and intra-cellular transport of HLA-DM and correction of the class II antigen-processing defect in T2 cells. Immunity 1994; 1: 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sanderson F, Kleijmeer MJ, Kelly A et al. Accumulation of HLA-DM, a regulator of antigen presentation, in MHC class II compartments. Science 1994; 266: 1566–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Karlsson L, Peleraux A, Lindstedt R et al. Reconstitution of an operational MHC class II compartment in nonantigen-presenting cells. Science 1994; 266: 1569–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sloan VS, Camerson P, Porter G et al. Mediation by HLA-DM of dissociation of peptides from HLA-DR. Nature 1995; 375: 802–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Denzin LK, Cresswell P. HLA-DM induces CLIP dissociation from MHC class II aß dimers and facilitates peptide loading. Cell 1995; 82: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Peters PJ, Neefjes JJ, Oorschot V et al. Segregation of MHC class II molecules from MHC class I molecules in the Golgi complex for transport to lysosomal compartments. Nature 1991; 349: 669–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Neefjes JJ, Stollorz V, Peters PJ et al. The biosynthetic pathway of MHC class II but not class I molecules intersects the endocytic route. Cell 1990; 61: 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Harding CV, Geuze HJ. Class II MHC molecules are present in macrophage lysosomes and phagolysosomes that function in the phagocytic processing of Listeria monocytogenes for presentation to T cells. J Cell Biol 1992; 119: 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Qui Y, Xu X, Wandinger-Ness A et al. Separation of subcellular compartments containing distinct functional forms of MHC class II. Cell Biology 1994; 124: 595–606.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tulp A, Verwoerd D, Dobberstein B et al. Isolation and characterization of the intracellular MHC class II compartment. Nature 1994; 369: 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    West MA, Lucocq JM, Watts C. Antigen processing and class II MHC peptide-loading compartments in human B-lymphoblastoid cells. Nature 1994; 369: 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rudensky AY, Maric M, Eastman E et al. Intracellular assembly and transport of endogenous peptide:MHC class II complexes. Immunity 1994; 1: 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Amigorena S, Drake JR, Webster P et al. Transient accumulation of new class II MHC molecules in a novel endocytic compartment in B lymphocytes. Nature 1994; 369: 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Amigorena S, Webster P, Drake J et al. Invariant chain cleavage and peptide loading in major histocompatibility complex class II vesicles. J Exp Med 1995; 181: 1729–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zachgo S, Dobberstein B, Griffiths G. A block in degradation of MHC class II-associated invariant chain correlates with a reduction in transport from endosome carrier vesicles to the prelysosome compartment. J Cell Sci 1992; 103: 811–816.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Riberdy JM, Avva RR, Geuze HJ et al. Transport and intracellular distribution of MHC class II molecules and associated invariant chain in normal and antigen-processing mutant cell lines. J Cell Biol 1994; 125: 1225–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Harding C, Collins DS, Slot JW et al. Liposome-encapsulated antigens are processed in lysosomes, recycled and presented to T cells. Cell 1991; 64: 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Harding CV, Geuze HJ. Immunogenic peptides bind to class II MHC molecules in an early lysosomal compartment. J Immunol 1993; 151: 3988–3998.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Davidson HW, Watts C. Epitope-directed processing of specific antigen in B lymphocytes. J Cell Biol 1989; 109: 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Davidson HW, Reid PA, Lanzavecchia A et al. Processed antigen binds to newly synthesized MHC class II molecules in antigen-specific B lymphocytes. Cell 1991; 67: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Simitsek PD, Campbell DG, Lanzavecchia A et al. Modulation of antigen processing by bound antibodies can boost or suppress class II major histocompatibility complex presentation of different T cell determinants. J Exp Med 1995; 181: 1957–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Germain RN, Hendrix LR. MHC class II structure, occupancy and surface expression determined by post-endoplasmic reticulum antigen binding. Nature 1991; 353: 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Castellino F, Germain RN. Extensive trafficking of MHC class II-invariant chain complexes in the endocytic pathway and appearance of peptide-loaded class II in multiple compartments. Immunity 1995; 2: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Murphy DB, Lo D, Rath S et al. A novel MHC class II epitope expressed in thymic medulla but not in cortex. Nature 1989; 338: 765–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Murphy DB, Rath S, Pizzo E et al. Monoclonal antibody detection of a major self peptide:MHC class II complex. J Immunol 1992; 148: 3478–3482.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Benaroch P, Yilla M, Raposo G et al. How MHC class II molecules reach the endocytic pathway. EMBO 1995; 14: 37–49.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Salamero J, Humbert M, Cosson P et al. Mouse B lymphocyte-specific endocytosis and recycling of MHC class II molecules. EMBO J 1990; 9: 3489–3496.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Pinet V, Vergelli M, Martin R et al. Antigen presentation mediated by recycling of surface HLA-DR molecules. Nature 1995; 375: 603–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Smiley ST, Laufer TM, Lo D et al. Transgenic mice expressing MHC class II molecules with truncated A cytoplasmic domains reveal signaling-independent defects in antigen presentation. Int Immunol 1995; 7: 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Smiley ST, Rudensky AY, Glimcher LH et al. Truncation of the class II ß chain cytoplasmic domain influences the level of class II/invariant chain-derived peptide complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; (in press).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nelson C, Roof RW, McCourt DW et al. Identification of the naturally processed form of the hen egg white lysozyme bound to the murine major histocompatibility complex class II molecule I-Ak. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 7380–7383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Malnati M, Marti M, LeVaute T et al. Processing pathways for presentation of cytosolic antigen to MHC class II-restricted cells. Nature 1992; 357: 702–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© R.G. Landes Company 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Y. Rudensky

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations