An Ecologist’s Encounter with Some Models in the Social Sciences

  • Stephen W. Pacala


The development of integrated regional models will obviously require intensive flow of information among modelers in the biological, physical and social sciences. This chapter outlines the short but intensive experience of one ecological modeler with a series of nine modeling papers in the social sciences. The papers were selected by the organizers of the conference to represent a broad range of modeling efforts targeting environmental issues. By design, the collection sacrifices depth for breadth of coverage.


Minimal Model Uncertainty Distribution Labor Productivity Growth Japanese Immigrant Statistical Extrapolation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Social Discipline

  1. Bostrom, A., B. Fischoff, and M. G. Morgan. 1992. Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: A methodology and application to radon. Journal of Social Issues 48: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Edmonds, J., and J. Reilly. 1983. Global energy and CO, to the year 2050. The Energy Journal 4: 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee, R. G., R. Flamm, M. G. Turner, C. Bledsoe, P. Chandler, C. DeFerrari, R. Gottfried, R. J. Naiman, N. Schumaker, and D. Wear. 1992. Integrating sustainable development and environmental vitality: A landscape ecology approach. In R.J. Naiman (ed.). Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 497–518.Google Scholar
  4. Grossman, W. D. 1991. Model-and strategy-driven geographical maps for ecological research and management. In P.G. Risser and J. Mellilo (eds.). Long Term Ecological Research: An International Perspective, Scope 47. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 241–256.Google Scholar
  5. Marknsen, A. 1986. Where and why high tech locates. In A. Galsmeier, P. Hall, and A. Marknsen (eds.). High Tech America. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 144–169.Google Scholar
  6. Nordhaus, W. D. 1991. To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. The Economic Journal 101: 920–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nordhaus, W. D., and G. Yohe. 1983. Future carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels. In Changing Climate: Report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee. National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 87–153.Google Scholar
  8. Portney, P. and A. Krupnick. 1991. Controlling air pollution: A benefit-cost assessment. Science 252: 522–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Reilly, J., J. Edmonds, R. Gardner, and A. Brenkert. 1987. Monte Carlo analysis of the IEA/GRAU energy/carbon emissions model. The Energy Journal 8: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Southworth, F., V. Dale, and R. V. O’Neill. 1991. Contrasting patterns of land use in Rondonia, Brazil: Simulating the effects on carbon release. International Social Sciences Journal 130: 681–698.Google Scholar
  11. May, R. M., and G. F. Oster. 1976. Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. Amer. Nat. 110: 573–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. May, R. M., J. Roughgarden, and S. A. Levin. 1987. Perspectives in Theoretical Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Nordhaus, W. D. 1991b. The cost of slowing climate: a survey. The Energy Journal 12: 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Norton, B. 1988. Commodity, amenity and morality: The limits of quantification in valuing biodiversity. In E. O. Wilson and F. M. Peter (eds.). Biodiversity. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., pp. 200–205.Google Scholar
  15. Parks, P. J. 1991. Models of forested and agricultural landscapes: integrating economics. In M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner (eds.). Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 309–322.Google Scholar
  16. Randall, A. 1988. What mainstream economists have to say about the value of biodiversity. In E. O. Wilson and F. M. Pater (eds.). Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
  17. Rhoads, S. E. 1990. The Economist’s View of the World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Sarmiento, J. L., and P. Rayner. 1993. An atmospheric transport contraint on anthropogenic CO2 source and sink distributions. (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  19. Shugart, H. H. 1984. A Theory of Forest Dynamics. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simberloff, D. S., and W. Boecklin. 1981. Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition. Evolution 35: 1206–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strong, D. R., Jr., and D. S. Simberloff. 1981. Straining at gnats and swallowing rations: character displacement. Evolution 35: 810–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tans, P. P., T. J. Conway, and T. Nakazawa. 1990. Latitudinal distribution of the surfaces and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide derived from surface observations and an atmospheric transport model. Journal of Geophysical Research 94: 5151–5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen W. Pacala

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations