Endosymbiosis of Rhizobium: Internalization of the “extracellular compartment” and metabolites exchange

  • Desh Pal S. Verma


Following a successful infection, the Rhizobium is released inside the host cell via a process resembling endocytosis. A rapid proloiferation of membrane vesicles and their fusion at the tip of the infection thread allows each bacterium to be released inside a membrane-bound vesicle. During the endosymbiotic state bacteria remain enclosed in a membrane envelope (peribacteroid membrane, PBM) which is constituted by the components of the plasma membrane of the host cell (8). The nature of this “extracellular compartment” is, however, not fully understood. It appears to be unique in that it is able to change its properties depending upon the fate of the process ie. symbiotic vs pathogenic. Physiological “internalization” of this compartment is a key step in acceptance of the foreign organism inside the host cell. Rhizobium enclosed in PBM behaves as an “organelle” having many properties in common with mitochondria. The PBM, while keeping bacteria physiologically “outside” the host cell cytoplasm and avoiding any pathogenic interaction, allows development of a close contact between the plant cell and bacteria for rapid and efficient exchange of metabolites. Recent studies from our laboratory suggestthat many specific host gene products (nodulins) are integrated into the PBM.


Glutamine Synthetase Extracellular Compartment Membrane Envelope Infection Thread Host Cell Cytoplasm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baker, M.E. and Saier, M.H. (1990) Cell 60, 185–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delauney, A.J. and Verma, D.P.S. (1990) Mol. Gen. Gen., in press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guerrero, F.D., Jones, J.T. and Mullet, J.E. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. in press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katinakis, P. and Verma, D.P.S. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4157–4161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mellor, R.B. and Werner, D. (1987) Symbiosis 3, 75–100.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morrison, N. and Verma, D.P.S. (1987) Plant Mol. Biol. 7, 51–61.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Udvardi, M.K., Price, G.D., Gresshoff, P.M. and Day, D.A. (1988) FEBS Letters 231, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verma, D.P.S., Kazazian, V., Zogbi, V. and Bal, A.K. (1978) J. Cell Biol. 78, 919–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verma, D.P.S., Fortin, M.G., Stanley, J., Mauro, V., Purohit, S. and Morrison, N. (1986) Plant Mol. Biol. 7, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verma, D.P.S., Delauney, A.J., Guida, M., Hirel, B., Schafer, R. and Koh, S. (1988) In Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions, eds. R. Palacios and D.P.S. Verma (APS Press, St. Paul) p. 315–320.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verma, D.P.S. and Fortin, M.G. (1989) In The Molecular Biology of Nuclear Genes, ed. I.K. Vasil, (Academic Press Inc., New York), pp. 329–353.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Desh Pal S. Verma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology CenterThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations