Static Versus Dynamic Imagery

  • Allan Paivio
  • James M. Clark


The distinction between static and dynamic imagery is familiar to us all at the commonsense level in so far as we are able to imagine not only stationary objects but also action scenes in which objects are in motion or in the process of being rotated or otherwise transformed. This chapter examines the distinction and its implications at several levels. First, we review the general contrast between static and dynamic representations and processes, including imagery. Then we consider individual differences, including sex differences, on that dimension. Finally, we discuss possible mechanisms and causal factors that could explain the phenomena associated with the distinction.


Mental Rotation Motoric Imagery Spatial Ability Biological Motion Left Visual Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ames, L. B., Metraux, R. W., and Walker, R. N. (1971). Adolescent Rorschach responses: Developmental trends from ten to sixteen years. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, L. B., Metraux, R. W., Rodell, J. L., and Walker, R. N. (1973). Rorschach responses in old age. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  3. Ames, L. B., Metraux, R. W., Rodell, J. L., and Walker, R. N. (1974). Child Rorschach responses: Developmental trends from two to ten years (2nd ed.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  4. Baenninger, M., and Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex roles, 20, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and direction in thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Betts, G. H. (1909). The distribution and functions of mental imagery. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  7. Cartwright, D. (1959). Lewinian theory as a contemporary systematic framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Denis, M. (1985). Visual imagery and the use of mental practice in the development of motor skills. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 10, 4 4S - 165.Google Scholar
  9. Eaton, W. O., von Bargen, D., and Keats, J. G. (1981). Gender understanding and dimensions of preschooler toy choice: Sex stereotype versus activity level. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelkamp, J. (1988). Images and actions in verbal learning. In M. Denis, J. Engelkamp, and J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Amsterdam, Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Eriksen, E. H. (1951). Sex differences in the play configurations of preadolescents. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21, 667–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Exner, J. E., and Weiner, I. B. (1982). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 3 ) Assessment of children and adolescents. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Ford, M. (1946). The application of the Rorschach test to young children. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  14. Franck, K., and Rosen, E. (1949). A projective test of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgopoulos, A. P., Lurito, J. T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A. B., and Massey, J. T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gold, J. M. (1987). The role of verbalization in the Rorschach response process: A review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 489–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gordon, R. (1949). An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. British Journal of Psychology, 39, 156–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, C. R. (1985). The role of mental practice and imagery ability in motor skill performance. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10, 4 17S - 21S.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, C. S., and Van de Castle, R. L. (1966). The content analysis of dreams. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  21. Hampson, E., and Kimura, D. (1988). Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 456–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harshman, R. A., Hampson, E., and Berenbaum, S. A. (1983). Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, Part I: Sex and handedness differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 144–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harshman, R. A., and Paivio, A. (1987). “Paradoxical” sex differences in self-reported imagery. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287–302.Google Scholar
  24. Holtzman, W. H., Diaz-Guerrero, R., and Swartz, J. D. (1975). Personality development in two cultures: A cross-cultural longitudinal study of school children in Mexico and the United States. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  25. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology, New York: Holt. (Reprinted by Dover, 1950 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johansonn, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 202–211.Google Scholar
  27. Krall, V., Sachs, H., Lazar, B., Rayson, B., Growe, G., Novar, L., and O’Connell, L. (1983). Rorschach norms for inner city children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 155–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levitt, E. E., and Truumaa, A. (1972). The Rorschach technique with children and adolescents: Applications and norms. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  29. Linn, M. C., and Peterson, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lockwood, J. L., Roll, S., and Matthews, D. B. (1981). Two studies of the movement responses in young children: New and highly discrepent norms. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 250–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P. E. (1954). Edward C. Tolman. In W. K. Estes, S. Koch, K. MacCorquodale, P. E. Meehl, C. G. Mueller, W. N. Schoenfeld, and W. S. Verplanck (Eds.), Modern learning theory. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.Google Scholar
  33. Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Effects of format of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire on content validity, split-half reliability, and the role of memory in test-retest reliability. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., and Taylor, D. G. (1983).Google Scholar
  36. Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles,9, 377–386.Google Scholar
  37. Nyborg, H. (1983). Spatial ability in men and women: review and new theory. Advances in Behavioral Research Therapy, 5, 89–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olson, D. M., and Eliot, J. (1986). Relationships between experiences, processing style, and sex-related differences in performance on spatial tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 447–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (Reprinted 1979, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ).Google Scholar
  40. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Paivio, A., Clark, J. M., Digdon, N., and Bons, T. (1989). Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging. Memory and Cognition, 17, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paivio, A., and Harshman, R. A. (1983).Google Scholar
  43. Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology,37, 461–483.Google Scholar
  44. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1966). L’image mentale chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (English translation published 1971 Mental imagery in the child: A study of the development of imaginal representations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  45. Poggio, T., and Koch, C. (198’7). Synapses that compute motion. Scientific American, 256, 46–52.Google Scholar
  46. Price, B. (1988). Asymmetries in the perception of biological motion. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.Google Scholar
  47. Price, B. M., and and Goodale, M. A. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of bilological motion. Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.Google Scholar
  48. Richardson, J. G., and Simpson, C. H. (1982). Children, gender, and social structure: An analysis of the content of letters to Santa Claus. Child Development, 53, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ross, H., and Taylor, H. (1989). Do boys prefer daddy or his physical style of play? Sex Roles, 20, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rubin, K. H. (1977). The social and cognitive value of preschool toys and activities. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 9, 382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saltz, E., and Nolan, S. D. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sheehan, P. W. (1967). A shortened form of Betts’ questionnaire upon mental imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 386–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Signorella, M. L., Jamison, W., and Drupa, M. H. (1989). Predicting spatial performance from gender stereotyping in activity preferences and in self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 25, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Tolman, E. C. (1959). Principles of purposive behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan Paivio
  • James M. Clark

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations