Statistical Methods for Developmental Toxicity Studies

  • K. S. Khera
  • H. C. Grice
  • D. J. Clegg
Part of the Current Issues in Toxicology book series (CI TOXICOLOGY)

Abstract

As detailed in the preceding chapters of this monograph, developmental toxicity may be expressed in terms of a number of possible reproductive or teratological abnormalities resulting from exposure to a particular toxicant. Developmental toxicity may be evaluated in studies involving exposure of one or both parents before conception, exposure of the conceptus during pregnancy, or perinatal exposure of the offspring. Multigeneration studies may also be used to assess the cumulative effects of exposure over several generations.

Keywords

Toxicity Covariance Infertility Teratogenicity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, R.J. (1984) Approximate likelihood ratio tests in the analysis of beta-binomial data. Appl. Stat. 33: 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cochran, W.G. (1943) Analysis of variance for percentages based on unequal numbers. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 38: 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crump, K.S. and Howe, R.B. (1980) A small-sample study of permutation tests for detecting teratogenic effects (Technical Report). Ebon Research Systems, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1985) Toxic Substances Control Act test guidelines; final rules. Fed. Regist. 50: 39426–39428; 39433–39434.Google Scholar
  5. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (1970) Advisory committee on protocols for safety evaluations. Panel on Reproduction report on reproduction studies in the safety evaluation of food additives and pesticide residues. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 16: 264–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frangos, C.C. and Stone, M. (1984) On jackknife, cross-validity and classical methods of estimating a proportion with batches of different sizes. Biometrika 71: 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gad, S. and Weil, C.S. (1986) Statistics and Experimental Design for Toxicologists, The Telford Press, Caldwell, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  8. Gart, J.J., Krewski, D., Lee, P.N., Tarone, R.E.D., and Washorendorf, F.J. (1987) Statistical Design in Analysis of Long Term Animal Experiments, vol. 3, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon.Google Scholar
  9. Gladen, B. (1979) The use of the jackknife to estimate proportions from toxicological data in the presence of litter effects. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74: 278–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haseman, J.K. and Hoel, D.G. (1974) Tables of Gehan’s generalized Wilcoxon test with fixed point censoring. J. Statistical Computation Simulation 3: 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haseman, J.K. and Hogan, M.D. (1975) Selection of the experimental unit in teratology studies. Teratology 12: 165–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haseman, J.K. and Kupper, L.L. (1979) Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 35: 281–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haseman, J.K. and Soares, E.R. (1976) The distribution of fetal death in control mice and its implications on statistical tests for dominant lethal effects. Mutat. Res. 41: 277–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hogan, M.D. and Hod, D.A. (1982) Extrapolation to man. In Principles and Methods of Toxicology ( Hayes, Ed.), pp. 711–731, Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D.A. (1973) Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Kleinman, J.C. (1973) Proportions with extraneous variance: Single and independent samples. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68: 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krewski, D., Brennan, J., and Bickis, M. (1984) The power of the Fisher permutation test in 2 x k tables. Commun. Stat. Simul. Corn. B13: 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krewski, D. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981) Dose response models for quantal response toxicity data. In Statistics and Related Topics ( M. Csorgo, D.A. Dawson, J.N.K. Rao, and A.K.M.E. Saleh, Eds.), pp. 201–231, North Holland, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Kupper, L.L. and Haseman, J.K. (1978) The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 34: 69–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kupper, L.L., Portier, C., Hogan, M.D., and Yamamoto, E. (1986) The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology. Biometrics 42: 85–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, F.O. and Haseman, J.K. (1976) A modified Jonckheere test against ordered alternatives when ties are present at a single extreme value. Biometrische Zeit. 18: 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mantel, N. (1969) Some statistical viewpoints in the study of carcinogenesis. In Progress in Experimental Tumor Research, Vol. 11, pp. 431–443, S. Karger, New York.Google Scholar
  23. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J.A. (1983) Generalized Linear Models, Chapman & Hall, London. Ochi, Y. and Prentice, R.L. (1984) Likelihood inference in a correlated probit regression model. Biometrika 71: 531–543.Google Scholar
  24. Oser, B.L. and Oser, M. (1956) Nutritional studies on rats on diets containing high levels of partial ester emulsifiers. II. Reproduction and lactation. J. Nutr. 60: 489–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Paul, S.R. (1985) A three-parameter generalization of the binomial distribution. Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 14: 1497–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prentice, R.L. (1986) Binary regression analysis using an extended beta-bionomial distribution with discussion on correlation induced by co-variate measurement errors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81: 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rai, K. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981) A generalized multi-dose response model for low-dose extrapolation. Biometrics 37: 341–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rai, K. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981) A generalized multi-dose response model for low-dose extrapolation. Biometrics 37: 341–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rao, J.N.K. and Scott, A.J. (1981) The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys. Chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roberts, G., Rao, J.N.K. and Kumar, S. (1987) Logistic regression analysis of sample survey data. Biometrika 74: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schreiner, C.A. and Steelman, J.R. (1977) Oral triethylene-melamine: Effects in the dominant lethal assay for mutagenicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 42: 487–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Segreti, A.C. and Munson, A.E. (1981) Estimation of the median lethal dose when responses within a litter are correlated. Biometrics 37: 153–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shirley, E.A.C. and Hickling, R. (1981) An evaluation of some statistical methods for analyzing numbers of abnormalities found amongst litters in teratology studies. Biometrics 37: 819–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soms, A.P. (1977) An algorithm for the discrete Fischer’s permutation test. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72: 662–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Southward, G.M. and Van Ryzin, J. (1972) Estimating the mean of a random binomial parameter. In Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium IV ( Le Cam, J. Neyman, and E.L. Scott, Eds.), pp. 249–263, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  36. Stucky, W. and Vollmar, J. (1976) Exact probabilities for ties linear rank tests. J. Statistical Computation Simulation 5: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tamura, R. and Young, S. (1986) The incorporation of historical control information in tests of proportions: Simulation study of Tarone’s procedure. Biometrics 42: 343–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tamura, R. and Young, S. (1987) A stabilized moment estimator for the beta-binomial distribution. Biometrics 43: 813–824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weil, C.S. (1970) Selection of the valid number of sampling units and a consideration of their combination in toxicological studies involving reproduction, teratogenesis or carcinogenesis. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 8: 177–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, D.A. (1975) The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 31: 949–952.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, D.A. (1982) Extra-binomial variation in logistic linear models. Appl. Stat. 31: 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. S. Khera
    • 1
  • H. C. Grice
    • 2
  • D. J. Clegg
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Protection BranchHealth and Welfare CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.NepeanCanada

Personalised recommendations