In the field of toxicology, many disciplines may come into play in making decisions about the inherent properties of a chemical with respect to its potential to cause adverse effects in a particular species of animal. In attempting to predict such adverse effects in humans, the toxicologist is obliged to extrapolate data from experimental animal studies, thus further complicating the process.
KeywordsGestation Period Filial Generation Untreated Female Parental Animal Reduce Litter Size
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Clegg, D.J. (1979) Animal reproduction and carcinogenicity studies in relation to human safety evaluation. In Toxicology and Occupational Medicine ( W.B. Deichmann, Ed.), pp. 45–59, Elsevier, North Holland.Google Scholar
- Clegg, D.J. and Wandelmaier, F. (1987) An investigation into the desirability of inclusion of a second litter per generation in rat multigeneration studies. In Pesticide Science and Biotechnology ( R. Greenhalgh and T.R. Roberts, Eds.), pp. 549–552, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.Google Scholar
- Clermont, Y. (1972) Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals: Seminiferous epithelium cycle and spermatagonial renewal. Physiol. Rev. 52: 196–236.Google Scholar
- EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1982) Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Sub-division F, Hazard Evaluation: Humans and domestic animals, pp. 130–137, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (1982) Toxicological Principles for Safety Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Color Additives and Color Additives Used in Food, No. PB83–170696, pp. 80–107, National Technical Information Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Fitzhugh, O.G. (1968) Reproduction tests. In Modern Trends in Toxicology ( E. Boyland and R. Goulding, Eds.), pp. 75–85, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
- Fraser, F.C. (1965) Some genetic aspects of teratology. In Teratology-Principles and Techniques ( J.G. Wilson and J. Warkany, Eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Keplinger, M., Deichman W.B., and Sala, F. (1970) Pesticide Symposia (W.B. Deichman, J.L. Radomski, and R.A. Penalver Eds.), p. 125, Halos and Associates, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
- Nisbet, I.C.T. and Karch, N.J. (1983) Chemical Hazards to Human Reproduction, p. 78, Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1983) OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Section 4, Health Effects, Guideline 416, May 1983, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- President’s Science Advisory Committee (1963) Use of Pesticides, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Vouk, V.B. and Sheehan, P.J., Eds. (1983) Methods for Assessing the Effects of Chemicals on Reproductive Functions, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- WHO (World Health Organization) (1984) Principles for Evaluating Health Risks to Progeny Associated with Exposure to Chemicals during Pregnancy, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Environmental Criteria Document, No. 30, World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar