General Considerations for Many Electron Systems

  • Ralph E. Christoffersen
Part of the Springer Advanced Texts in Chemistry book series (SATC)


Thus far our considerations have in general been limited to systems containing only a single electron. While we have seen that many important principles and techniques can be developed using those cases, we shall now see that a major new concept is needed for systems containing more than one electron. That concept (the Pauli Exclusion Principle) will be developed in the sections to follow, along with a number of analyses and techniques that are of substantial importance in contemporary applications of quantum mechanics to chemistry. Before doing that, however, it is useful to introduce several conceptual approaches to many electron systems that were developed early, as well as the basic concepts of group theory. These will help us to understand and motivate the discussions to follow, as well as to provide useful tools for incorporating and understanding symmetry properties of molecules and wavefunctions.


Irreducible Representation General Consideration Symmetry Operation Virial Theorem Character Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. Heitler and F. London, Z. Phys., 44, 455 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    W. Kolos and L. Wolniewicz, J. Chem. Phys., 49, 404–410 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 5.
    S. Wang, Phys. Rev., 31, 579 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    S. Weinbaum, J. Chem. Phys., 1, 593 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    R. S. Mulliken, Phys. Rev., 32, 186, 388, 761(1928);Google Scholar
  6. E. Hund, Z. Phys., 51, 759 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Hund, Z. Electrochem., 34, 437 (1928);Google Scholar
  8. J. E. Lennard-Jones, Trans. Faraday Soc., 25, 688 (1928).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For additional discussion see, for example, M. Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964; L. H. Hall, Group Theory and Symmetry in Chemistry, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969; and G. G. Hall, Applied Group Theory, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    The symbols used here to designate group names are known as the Schoenflies notation. Other systems of nomenclature are also available, e. g., the Hermann-Mauguin nomenclature used for crystallographic point groups. For a detailed procedure to determine the point group for any molecule see, for example, L. H. Hall, Group Theory and Symmetry in Chemistry, McGraw Hill, New York, 1969, Chapter 4; see also F. A. Cotton, Chemical Applications of Group Theory, John Wiley, New York, 1963, Chapter 3, Sect. 10.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    R. E. Christoffersen, S. Hagstrom, and F. P. Prosser, J. Chem. Phys., 40, 236 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 25.
    These theorems will not be proved here, but the proofs are available in many group theory texts. See, for example, E. P. Wigner, Group Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1959, Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  13. W. Pauli, Z. Phys., 31, 765–785 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 46.
    W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys., 38, 411–426 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 47.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. (London), A112, 661–677 (1926).Google Scholar
  16. J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev., 34, 1293–1322 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. F. A. Matsen, Adv. Quantum Chem., 1, 60–114 (1964).Google Scholar
  18. 58.
    P. O. Löwdin, Adv. Chem. Phys., 2, 207–322 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 60.
    P. O. Löwdin, Phys. Rev., 97, 1474–1490 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 66.
    J. O. Hirschfelder, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 1462 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 68.
    V. Fock, Z. Phys., 63, 855 (1930)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. J. C. Slater, J. Chem. Phys., 1, 687 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 70.
    See J. I. Musher, Am. J. Phys., 34, 267 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R. E. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 1298 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 72.
    The analysis used in this section was given first by E. Hylleraas, Z. Phys., 54, 347 (1929) and V. Fock, Z. Phys., 63, 855 (1930), and the form used here was outlined by P. O. Löwdin, Adv. Chem. Phys., 2, 207 (1959).Google Scholar
  26. 78.
    R. G. Parr and J. E. Brown, J. Chem. Phys., 49, 4849 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R. F. W. Bader and P. M. Beddall, J. Chem. Phys., 56, 3320 (1972);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R. F. W. Bader, P. M. Beddall, and J. J. Peslak, J. Chem. Phys., 58, 557 (1973);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R. F. W. Bader, A. J. Duke, and R. R. Messer, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 95, 7715 (1973);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R. F. W. Bader, J. Chem. Phys., 73, 2871 (1980);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R. F. W. Bader, Acct. Chem. Res., 8, 34 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 83.
    Such an approach is frequently referred to as the “vector model” of the atom. For a detailed discussion see, for example, A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960.Google Scholar
  33. 84.
    For a comprehensive discussion and listing of eigenfunctions of and SZ using Slater determinants, see J. C. Slater, Quantum Theory of Atomic Structure, Volume 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960, Chapter 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph E. Christoffersen
    • 1
  1. 1.The Upjohn CompanyKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations