Advertisement

Summary and Conclusions

  • Kenneth L. HeckJr.
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 23)

Abstract

The principal use of long-term environmental data records is to help formulate hypotheses about how ecological systems work. Long-term records are especially useful when a phenomenon under study is intermittent or has a relatively long periodicity. Long-term records also provide a standard against which the effects of experimental manipulations may be evaluated (Likens, 1983; Coull, 1985). The data derived from the long-term studies near Calvert Cliffs are first summarized and then the hypotheses about the ecological interactions indicated by these data are discussed. The effects of the construction and operation of the CCNPP on the Bay environment are evaluated and, finally, suggestions are made for future monitoring studies.

Keywords

Dissolve Inorganic Nitrogen Submerged Vegetation Oyster Population Minimum Detectable Difference York Bight 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP) (1981) Assessment of thermal, entrainment and impingement impacts on the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant. Report No 81-10: PA: Acad Nat Sci Phila: 297 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Aller RC (1980) Diagenetic processes near the sediment-water interface of Long Island Sound. II: Fe and Mn. Adv in Geophysics 22:351–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aller RC (1983) The importance of the diffusive permeability of animal burrow linings in determining marine sediment chemistry. J Mar Res 41:299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnthouse LW, Boreman J, Christensen SW, Goodyear C, Van Winkle W and Vaughan DS (1984) Population biology in the courtroom: The Hudson River controversy. Bioscience 34:14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter HH, Regier RJ, Schiemer EW and Michael JA (1978) The summertime vertical distribution of dissolved oxygen at the Calvert Cliffs Generating Station: a physical interpretation. Spec. Rpt. 60. Ref. 78-1, CBI. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins: 95 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran WG (1963) Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley and Sons. 273 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Coull BC (1985) The use of long-term biological data to generate testable hypotheses. Estuaries 8:84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’elia CF, Nelson DM and Boynton WR (1983) Chesapeake Bay nutrient and plankton dynamics: III: The annual cycle of dissolved silicon. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:1945–1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eberhardt LL (1976) Quantitative ecology and impact assessment. J Environ Manage 4:27–60.Google Scholar
  10. Flemer DA, Mackiernan GB, Nehlsen Wand, Tippie VK (1983) Chesapeake Bay: a profile of environmental change. US EPA, Region 3: Philadelphia, PA: 200 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Grosslein MD and Azarovitz TR (1982) Fish distribution. MESA New York Bight Altas Monograph 15. NY: Sea Grant Institute of State University of New York and Cornell University: 182 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Hargrave BT (1980) Factors affecting the flux of organic matter to sediments in a marine bay. In: Tenone KR and Coull BC (eds) Marine benthic dynamics. Columbia, SC: Univ. South Carolina Press: pp. 243–263.Google Scholar
  13. Heck KL Jr and Horwitz RJ (1984) Statistical analysis of sampling data to assess impact in marine environments. In: White HH (ed) Concepts in marine pollution measurement. College Park, MD: Maryland Sea Grant: University of Maryland: pp. 233–245.Google Scholar
  14. Holland AF, Mountford NK, Hiegel MH, Kaumeyer KR and Mihursky JA (1980) Influence of predation on infaunal abundance in Upper Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. Mar Biol 57:221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kristensen E (1984) Effect of natural concentrations on nutrient exchange between a polychaete burrow in estuarine sediment and the overlying water. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 75:171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Likens GE (1983) A priority for ecological research. Bull Ecol Soc Amer 64:234–243.Google Scholar
  17. Malone TC, Hopkins TS, Falkowski PC and Whitledge TE (1983) Production and transport of phytoplankton biomass over the continental shelf of the New York Bight. Cont Shelf Res 1:305–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin Marietta Corporation (1980) Summary of findings: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant aquatic monitoring program: Vol I: Rpt. PPSP-CC-80-2. Baltimore, MD: Martin Marietta Corporation Environmental Center.Google Scholar
  19. Officer CB, Biggs RB, Taft JL, Cronin LE, Tyler MA and Boynton WR (1984) Chesapeake Bay anoxia: Origin, development and significance. Science 223:22–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orth RJ and Moore KA (1983) Chesapeake Bay: an unprecedented decline in submerged vegetation. Science 222:51–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Riley GA (1956) Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954: IX: Production and utilization of organic matter. Bull Bingham Oceanogr Coll 15:324–343.Google Scholar
  22. Rothschild BJ, Jones PW and Wilson JS (1981) Trends in Chesapeake Bay fisheries. In: Improving management of Chesapeake Bay. Trans. 46th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf Washington DC: Wildlife Management Institute: pp 284-298.Google Scholar
  23. Sellner KG (1983) Plankton productivity and biomass in a tributary of the upper Chesapeake Bay: I: Importance of size-fractionated phytoplankton productivity, biomass and species composition in carbon export. Est Coastal Shelf Sci 17:187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sellner KG and Olson MM (In Press) Copepod grazing of red tides in Chesapeake Bay. Third Int Conf in Toxic Dinoflagellates. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Sellner KG and Horwitz RJ (1983) Plankton interactions in the Patuxent River estuary: Field studies of community composition and density, with a deterministic model of the production of fecal matter, sediment oxygen demand and nutrient regeneration. Rept No 82-14F. PA: Acad Nat Sci Phila: 119 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Taft JC, Taylor WR, Hartwig EO and Loftus R (1980) Seasonal oxygen depletion in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 3:242–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas JM (1977) Factors to consider in monitoring programs suggested by statistical analysis of available data. In: Van Winkle W (ed.) Assessing the effects of power-plantinduced mortality on fish populations. New York: Pergamon Press: pp 243–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth L. HeckJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations