Advertisement

Motivational Chaos: A Simple Model

  • Julius Kuhl
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

In psychology, the use of formal models is controversial. Some psychologists believe that the premature construction of formal models blinds us to the complexities of the phenomena to be explained, while others maintain that only formal models can achieve what science is all about: Replace our everyday intuitions about the world by precise formal statements whose implications can be tested empirically. Although descriptive methods are more adequate for capturing the complexities of behavior in natural settings than formal models, the former provide little explanatory value. However, descriptive and formal approaches are complementary rather than contradictory. Ideally there should be an optimal balance between documentation of behavioral phenomena and development of formal models explaining those observations. In most areas of social psychology this balance has not yet been achieved. Documentation of phenomena fills far more journal space than formal modelling. In the area of social motivation the development of formal models is more advanced than in most other areas due to the work of Atkinson and his associates (1957; 1958; 1981; Atkinson & Feather, 1966; Atkinson & Birch, 1970; 1978).

Keywords

Subjective Probability Achievement Motivation Social Motivation Recursive Model Goal Discrepancy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, L, & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human’ associative memory. Washington: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risktaking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, J. W. (1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson, J. W. (1974). Strength of motivation and efficiency of performance. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement, (pp. 193–218). Washington, DC: Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson, J. W. (1981). Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1978). Introduction to motivation. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  11. Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Craik, F. J. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feather, N. T. (1961). The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement-related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 552–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feather, N. T. (1962). The study of persistence. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 94–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feather, N. T. (1963). Persistence at a difficult task with alternative task of intermediate difficulty. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 604–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feather, N. T. (1967). Valence of outcome and expectation of success in relation to task difficulty and perceived locus of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 372–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gjesme, T. (1981). Is there any future in achievement motivation? Motivation and emotion, 5, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gjesme, T., & Nyga, R., (1970). Achievement-related motives: Theoretical considerations and construction of a measuring instrument. Unpublished manuscript. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  21. Heckhausen, H. (1967). The anatomy of achievement motivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heckhausen, H., Schmalt, H. D., & Schneider, K. (1985). Achievement motivation in perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hofstadter, D. R. (1985). Strange attractors: Mathematical patterns delicately poised between order and chaos. Scientific American, 5, 22–43.Google Scholar
  25. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Karabenick, S. A., & Youssef, Z. I. (1968). Performance as a function of achievement levels and perceived difficulty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhl, J. (1977). Meβ-und prozeβtheoretische analysen einiger person- und Situationsparameter der leistungmotivation). Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
  29. Kuhl, J. (1978). Standard setting and risk preference: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation and an empirical test. Psychological Review, 85, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuhl, J. (1982). The expectancy-value approach in the theory of social motivation: Elaborations, extensions, critique. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 125–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und handlungskontrolle (Motivation, conflict, and action control). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 12), (pp. 99–170). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Selfregulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979a). Behavioral change in a constant environment: Moving to more difficult tasks in spite of constant expectations of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979b). The dynamic theory of achievement motivation: From episodic to dynamic thinking. Psychological Review, 86, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leventhal, H. (1980). Toward a comprehensive theory of emotions. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 139–207.Google Scholar
  37. May, R. M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 10, 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Norman, D., & Rumelhart, D. (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  40. Nygard, R. (1977). Personality, situation, and persistence. Oslo: Universitets-forlaget.Google Scholar
  41. Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  42. Raynor, J. O. (1969). Future orientation and motivation of immediate activity: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation. Psychological Review, 76, 606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reitman, W. (1973). Problem solving, comprehension, and memory. In G. J. Dalenoort (Ed.), Process models for psychology. Rotterdam: University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schneider, K. (1973). Motivation unter Erfolgsrisiko. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  45. Schneider, K. (1978). Atkinson’s “risk preference” model: Should it be revised? Motivation and Emotion, 2, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  47. Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  48. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julius Kuhl
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OsnabrückDeutschland

Personalised recommendations