Abstract
Since the mid-1970s there has been a tremendous growth in eyewitness research. One estimate indicates that over 85% of the entire eyewitness literature has been published since 1978 (Wells & Loftus, 1984). Numerous findings of forensic import to criminal investigators and courts of law have been generated by modern eyewitness researchers. Although psychologists, among others, have learned a great deal about the influence of various factors on adults’ eyewitness memory, very little is known about their effect on children’s memory. This is indeed unfortunate because many children observe and are victims in criminal proceedings. Children are increasingly being called upon by courts to provide their recollection of events they previously witnessed (Beach, 1983), especially if they are the only witness to a crime. In some cases today children as young as 3 or 4 years of age are testifying in criminal proceedings, for example, the McMartin Preschool trial of sexual abuse in Los Angeles, California, which has received nationwide publicity.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
A shorter version of this paper was presented for the symposium, Current Trends in Evaluating Children’s Memory for Witnessed Events, at the 1985 annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, California.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beach, B. H. (1983, January 31). Out of the mouthes of babes. Time, p. 43.
Blaney, R. L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children’s recognition memory for faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 441–442.
Brigham, J. C. (1981). The accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it? Florida Bar Journal, 55, 714–721.
Brigham, J. C., Maas, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673–681.
Brown, A. L. (1979). Theories of memory and the problem of development: Activity, growth, and knowledge. In L. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Buckhout, R., Alper, A., Chern, S., Silverberg, G., & Slomovits, M. (1974). Determinants of eyewitness performance on lineup. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 191–192.
Bull, R., & Clifford, B. R. (1984). Earwitness voice recognition accuracy. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ceci, S. J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). Don’t forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development, 56 (1), 152–164.
Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children’s eyewitness testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 69–85.
Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Short-term memory limitations in children: Capacity or processing deficits? Memory and Cognition, 4, 559–572.
Clifford, B. R. (1979). A critique of eyewitness research. In M. Greeneberg, P. Morris, and R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory. London: Academic Press, pp. 199–209.
Clifford, B. R., & Denot, H. (1982). Visual and verbal testimony and identification under conditions of stress. Unpublished manuscript, North East London Polytechnic.
Clifford, B. R., & Fleming, W. (in press). Face and voice identification in a field setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Clifford, B. R., & Hollin C. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364–370.
Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243–260.
Deffenbacher, K. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In B. R. Clifford & S. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Deffenbacher, K., & Loftus, E. (1982). Do jurors share common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15–30.
Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1–22.
Federal Rules of Evidence for United States and Magistrates (1975). St. Paul, Minn.: West.
Flin, R. H. (1980). Age effects in children’s memory for unfamiliar faces. Developmental Psychology, 16, 373–374,
Freidson, E., & Feldman, J. J. (1958). The public looks at dental care. Journal of American Dental Association, 57, 325–335.
Giesbrecht, L. W. (1979). The effects of arousal and depth of processing on facial recognition. Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4561-B. (University Microfilms No. 80–06, 257 )
Glennon, B., & Weisz, J. R. (1978). An observational approach to the assessment of anxiety in young children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1246–1257.
Goodman, G. S. (1984). Children’s testimony in historical perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 9–31.
Handkins, R. E., & Cross, J. F. ( 1985, May). Can a voice lineup be too fair? Paper presented at Symposium on Forensic and Scientific Issues in Voice Recognition at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Hastie, R. (1980). From eyewitness testimony to beyond reasonable doubt. Unpublished manuscript, Howard University, Washington, DC.
Hovland, C. I., & Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Johnson, C., & Scott, B. ( 1976, August). Eyewitness testimony and suspect identification as a function of arousal, sex of witness, and scheduling of interrogation. Paper presented at meeting of American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Kassin, S. M. (1984). Eyewitness identification: Victims versus bystanders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 519–529.
Kleinknecht, R. A., Klepac, R. K., & Alexander, L. D. (1973). Origins and characteristics of fear of dentistry. Journal of American Dental Association, 86, 842–848.
Lautch, H. (1971). Dental phobia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 73, 212–218.
Lindberg, M. (1980). Is knowledge base development a necessary and sufficient condition for memory development? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 401–410.
Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F., and Burns, T. W. ( 1981, November). Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photo-spreads. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, D. C. (1982). The need for power, sympathetic activation and illness. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 31–41.
McClelland, D. C., Davidson, R. J., Floor, E., & Saron, C. (1980). Stressed power motivation, sympathetic activation, immune function and illness. Journal of Human Stress, 6 (2), 11–9.
McClelland, D. C., & Kirshnit (1984). The effect of motivational arousal through films on salivary immune function. Unpublished paper: Harvard University, Department of Psychology and Social Relations.
Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting assessment of witness credibility. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Mueller, J. H., Bailis, K. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979). Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 511–515.
Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, K., Fivush, R., Hudson, J., & Lucariello, J. (1983). Scripts and the development of memory. In M. T. H. Chi (Ed.), Trends in memory development. New York: Karger.
Nowicki, S., Winograd, E., and Millard, B. A. (1979). Memory for faces: A social learning analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 460–468.
Perlmutter, M. (Ed.). (1980). Children’s memory. New directions in child development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peters, D. P., & Hagen, S. ( 1986, August). A stranger at daycare: Preschoolers’ memory of physical contact, faces and voices. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Pynoos, R., & Eth, R. (1984). The child as witness to homicide. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 87–108.
Sanders, G. S. (1984). Effects of context cues on eyewitness identification responses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 386–397.
Sealy, A. P., & Wain, C. M. (1980). Person perception and juror’s decisions. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 19, 7–16.
Selye, H. (1975). Confusion and controversy in the stress field. Journal of Human Stress, 1, 37–44.
Siegel, J. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Impact of anxiety and life stress upon eyewitness testimony. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 479–480.
Sussman, E. D., & Sugarman, R. C. (1972). The effect of certain distractions on identification by witnesses. In A. Zavala & J. J. Paley (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Terr, L. (1981). Psychic trauma in children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 14–19.
Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14 (2), 89–103.
Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688–696.
Wells, G. L., & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682–687.
Wells, G. L., Leippe, M. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 285–293.
Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1984). Eyewitness research: Then and now. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. L. & Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Woocher, F. D. (1977). Did your eyes deceive you? Expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Stanford Law Review, 29, 969–1030.
Yarmey, A. D. (1984). Age as a factor in eyewitness memory. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zanni, G. R., & Offermann, J. T. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: An exploration of question wording upon recall as a function of neuroticism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 163–166.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peters, D.P. (1987). The Impact of Naturally Occurring Stress on Children’s Memory. In: Ceci, S.J., Toglia, M.P., Ross, D.F. (eds) Children’s Eyewitness Memory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6338-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6338-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-6340-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6338-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive