The Impact of Naturally Occurring Stress on Children’s Memory

  • Douglas P. Peters


Since the mid-1970s there has been a tremendous growth in eyewitness research. One estimate indicates that over 85% of the entire eyewitness literature has been published since 1978 (Wells & Loftus, 1984). Numerous findings of forensic import to criminal investigators and courts of law have been generated by modern eyewitness researchers. Although psychologists, among others, have learned a great deal about the influence of various factors on adults’ eyewitness memory, very little is known about their effect on children’s memory. This is indeed unfortunate because many children observe and are victims in criminal proceedings. Children are increasingly being called upon by courts to provide their recollection of events they previously witnessed (Beach, 1983), especially if they are the only witness to a crime. In some cases today children as young as 3 or 4 years of age are testifying in criminal proceedings, for example, the McMartin Preschool trial of sexual abuse in Los Angeles, California, which has received nationwide publicity.


Home Visit Retention Interval Dental Visit Voice Recognition Anxiety Rating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beach, B. H. (1983, January 31). Out of the mouthes of babes. Time, p. 43.Google Scholar
  2. Blaney, R. L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children’s recognition memory for faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 441–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brigham, J. C. (1981). The accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it? Florida Bar Journal, 55, 714–721.Google Scholar
  4. Brigham, J. C., Maas, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L. (1979). Theories of memory and the problem of development: Activity, growth, and knowledge. In L. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Buckhout, R., Alper, A., Chern, S., Silverberg, G., & Slomovits, M. (1974). Determinants of eyewitness performance on lineup. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 191–192.Google Scholar
  7. Bull, R., & Clifford, B. R. (1984). Earwitness voice recognition accuracy. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ceci, S. J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). Don’t forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development, 56 (1), 152–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children’s eyewitness testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Short-term memory limitations in children: Capacity or processing deficits? Memory and Cognition, 4, 559–572.Google Scholar
  11. Clifford, B. R. (1979). A critique of eyewitness research. In M. Greeneberg, P. Morris, and R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory. London: Academic Press, pp. 199–209.Google Scholar
  12. Clifford, B. R., & Denot, H. (1982). Visual and verbal testimony and identification under conditions of stress. Unpublished manuscript, North East London Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  13. Clifford, B. R., & Fleming, W. (in press). Face and voice identification in a field setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  14. Clifford, B. R., & Hollin C. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deffenbacher, K. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In B. R. Clifford & S. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Deffenbacher, K., & Loftus, E. (1982). Do jurors share common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federal Rules of Evidence for United States and Magistrates (1975). St. Paul, Minn.: West.Google Scholar
  21. Flin, R. H. (1980). Age effects in children’s memory for unfamiliar faces. Developmental Psychology, 16, 373–374,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freidson, E., & Feldman, J. J. (1958). The public looks at dental care. Journal of American Dental Association, 57, 325–335.Google Scholar
  23. Giesbrecht, L. W. (1979). The effects of arousal and depth of processing on facial recognition. Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4561-B. (University Microfilms No. 80–06, 257 )Google Scholar
  24. Glennon, B., & Weisz, J. R. (1978). An observational approach to the assessment of anxiety in young children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1246–1257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman, G. S. (1984). Children’s testimony in historical perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Handkins, R. E., & Cross, J. F. ( 1985, May). Can a voice lineup be too fair? Paper presented at Symposium on Forensic and Scientific Issues in Voice Recognition at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Hastie, R. (1980). From eyewitness testimony to beyond reasonable doubt. Unpublished manuscript, Howard University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Hovland, C. I., & Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, C., & Scott, B. ( 1976, August). Eyewitness testimony and suspect identification as a function of arousal, sex of witness, and scheduling of interrogation. Paper presented at meeting of American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Kassin, S. M. (1984). Eyewitness identification: Victims versus bystanders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleinknecht, R. A., Klepac, R. K., & Alexander, L. D. (1973). Origins and characteristics of fear of dentistry. Journal of American Dental Association, 86, 842–848.Google Scholar
  32. Lautch, H. (1971). Dental phobia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 73, 212–218.Google Scholar
  33. Lindberg, M. (1980). Is knowledge base development a necessary and sufficient condition for memory development? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 401–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Loftus, E. F., and Burns, T. W. ( 1981, November). Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  36. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photo-spreads. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. McClelland, D. C. (1982). The need for power, sympathetic activation and illness. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McClelland, D. C., Davidson, R. J., Floor, E., & Saron, C. (1980). Stressed power motivation, sympathetic activation, immune function and illness. Journal of Human Stress, 6 (2), 11–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McClelland, D. C., & Kirshnit (1984). The effect of motivational arousal through films on salivary immune function. Unpublished paper: Harvard University, Department of Psychology and Social Relations.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting assessment of witness credibility. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mueller, J. H., Bailis, K. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979). Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 511–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Nelson, K., Fivush, R., Hudson, J., & Lucariello, J. (1983). Scripts and the development of memory. In M. T. H. Chi (Ed.), Trends in memory development. New York: Karger.Google Scholar
  44. Nowicki, S., Winograd, E., and Millard, B. A. (1979). Memory for faces: A social learning analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perlmutter, M. (Ed.). (1980). Children’s memory. New directions in child development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Peters, D. P., & Hagen, S. ( 1986, August). A stranger at daycare: Preschoolers’ memory of physical contact, faces and voices. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Pynoos, R., & Eth, R. (1984). The child as witness to homicide. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanders, G. S. (1984). Effects of context cues on eyewitness identification responses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sealy, A. P., & Wain, C. M. (1980). Person perception and juror’s decisions. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 19, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Selye, H. (1975). Confusion and controversy in the stress field. Journal of Human Stress, 1, 37–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siegel, J. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Impact of anxiety and life stress upon eyewitness testimony. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 479–480.Google Scholar
  52. Sussman, E. D., & Sugarman, R. C. (1972). The effect of certain distractions on identification by witnesses. In A. Zavala & J. J. Paley (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  53. Terr, L. (1981). Psychic trauma in children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 14–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14 (2), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wells, G. L., & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wells, G. L., Leippe, M. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1984). Eyewitness research: Then and now. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wells, G. L. & Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Woocher, F. D. (1977). Did your eyes deceive you? Expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Stanford Law Review, 29, 969–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yarmey, A. D. (1984). Age as a factor in eyewitness memory. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Zanni, G. R., & Offermann, J. T. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: An exploration of question wording upon recall as a function of neuroticism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 163–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas P. Peters

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations