Suggestibility and the Child Witness

  • Mary Ann King
  • John C. Yuille

Abstract

Until recently, children were generally viewed as unable to supply trustworthy testimony. Legal authors dating back to the Middle Ages have voiced concerns about children’s abilities as witnesses, citing their proneness to invention, their inability to distinguish fact from fantasy, and their incompetence for accurately recalling events uncontaminated by suggestion (Goodman, 1984). Legal rulings on the admissibility of children’s testimony reflect these long-standing assumptions about children. In Canada, for instance, the law states clearly that the testimony obtained from “witnesses of tender years” is subject to special conditions and particular scrutiny (Canada Evidence Act, R.S.C. 1970, c E-10, S.16).

Keywords

Clay Resis Tated Dition Shoe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berliner, L., & Barbieri, M. K. (1984). The testimony of the child victim of sexual assault. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bigelow, S. (1967). Witnesses of tender years. Criminal Law Quarterly, 9, 298–306.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A. L. (1979). Theories of memory and the problem of development: Activity, growth, and knowledge. In F. I. M. Craik & L. Cermak (Eds.), Levels of processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Canada Evidence Act, R.S.C., cE-10, S. 16 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (This volume). Age differences in suggestibility; Narrowing the uncertainties. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Chi, M. T. H. (Ed.). (1983). Trends in memory development. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, R. L., & Harnick, M. A. (1980). The susceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion. Law and Human Behavior, 4 (3), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale, P. S., Loftus, E. F., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodd, D. H., & Bradshaw, J. M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, E. M., Whitney, P., & Kunen, S. (1982). Integration of visual and verbal information in children’s memories. Child Development, 53, 1215–1223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldbeck, S. L. (1983). Reconstructing a large-scale spatial arrangement: Effects of environment organization and operativity. Developmental Psychology, 19 (4), 644–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodman, G. (1984). Children’s testimony in historical perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hazen, N. L., Lockman, J. J., & Pick, Jr., H. L. (1978). The development of children’s representations of large-scale environments. Child Development, 49, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, M., & Grieve, R. (1980). On asking children bizarre questions. In M. Donaldson, R. Grieve, & C. Pratt (Eds.), Early childhood development and education. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. K., & Foley, M. A. (1984). Differentiating fact from fantasy: The reliability of children’s memory. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, D. P. H. ( 1985, November). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse in children. Paper presented at the Seventh National Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  19. King, M. A., & Yuille, J. C. (1986). An investigation of children’s eyewitness abilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  20. Lindberg, M. (1980). Is knowledge base development a necessary and sufficient condition for memory development Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 401–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Loftus, E. F., & Davies, G. M. (1984). Distortions in the memory of children. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (2), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marin, B. V., Holmes, D. L., Guth, M., & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGarrigle, J., Grieve, R., & Hughes, M. (1978). Interpreting inclusion: A contribution to the study of the child’s cognitive and linguistic development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1981). Generalized event representations: Basic building blocks of cognitive development. In A. Brown & M. Lamb (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 131–158 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Paris, S. G. (1978). The development of interference and transformation as memory operations. In P. A. Ornstein (Ed.), Memory development in children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1977). Constructive aspects of children’s comprehension and memory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child’s construction of quantities: Conservation and atomism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Rogoff, B., & Waddell, K. J. (1982). Memory for information organized in a scene by children from two cultures. Child Development, 53, 1224–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose, S. A., & Blank, M. (1969). The potency of context in children’s cognition: An illustration through conservation. Child Development, 40, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shepherd, J., Davies, G., & Ellis, H. (1981). Studies of cue saliency. In G. Davies, M. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Todd, C. M., & Perlmutter, M. (1980). Reality recalled by preschool children. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Children’s memory: New directions in child development (No. X ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Varendonck, J. (1911). Les temoignages d’enfants dans un proces retentissant. Archives de Psychologie, 11, 129–171.Google Scholar
  36. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1984). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 776–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yuille, J. C. (1980). A critical examination of the psychological and practical implications of eyewitness research. Law and Human Behavior, 4 (4), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuille, J. C., Cutshall, J. L., & King, M. A. (1986). Age-related changes in eyewitness accounts and photo-identification. In press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Ann King
  • John C. Yuille

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations