Evaluating Educational Programs

  • George B. Forsythe
  • James C. Sadler
  • Ruth de Bliek


Having snatched a few moments out of a busy schedule to go through paperwork which had piled up on the desk, Dr. Peffer noticed the report of last week’s department education committee meeting. The minutes reminded him of the lively discussion that had taken place during the meeting about the educational goals of the department and whether or not they were being adequately addressed by the residency program. A survey of recent graduates suggested that some of the goals may not be emphasized as much as they should be. As director of the residency program, Dr. Peffer was concerned about his inability to offer more than just his opinion about the program’s effectiveness in attaining the goals. At the department chairperson’s request, he agreed to undertake a systematic evaluation of the residency program. But how?


Educational Program Program Evaluation Residency Program Evaluation Effort Program Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cronbach LJ. Course improvement through evaluation. Teach Coll Rec 64:672–683, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alkin MC. Evaluation theory development. Evaluat Coram 2:2–7, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stufflebeam DL. Alternative approaches to educational evaluation: A self-study guide for educators. In Evaluation in Education. W J Popham (Ed) Berkeley, California: McCutchan, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. In AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1. RE Stake (Ed). Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tyler RW. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scriven M. Evaluation perspectives and procedures. In Evaluation in Education. W J Popham (Ed) Berkeley, California: McCutchan, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nevo D. The conceptualization of educational evaluation: an analytical review of the literature. Rev Educ Res 53:117–128, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guba EG, and Lincoln YS. Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stake, RE. (Ed) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stake, RE. The case study method in social inquiry. Educ Res, 7:5–8, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacDonald B. Evaluation and the Control of Education. Norwich, England: Centre for Applied Research in Education, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parlett M, Hamilton D. Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programmes. In Beyond the Numbers Game. D Hamilton et al. (Eds) Berkeley, California: McCutchan, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas L. The Medusa and the Snail. New York: Viking Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engel, GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129–135, 1977.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    House ER. Evaluating with Validity. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisner EW. On the use of educational connoisseurship and (educational) criticism for evaluating classroom life. Teach Coll Rec 78:345–358, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pedhazur EJ. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duncan OD. Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kerlinger FN. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patton MQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guba EG. Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation. Monograph Series, No. 8. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • George B. Forsythe
  • James C. Sadler
  • Ruth de Bliek

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations