Artificial Insemination by Donor: Discrete time survival data with crossed and nested random effects
A discrete time survival problem arising in studies of artificial insemination by donor is described. This problem involves two levels of “ frailty” effect to model heterogeneity of female fecundability, together with a further two nested sets of random effects for sperm donor and donation. Parametric and non-parametric approaches to modelling such data are discussed, and computational difficulties highlighted. Attention is also drawn to the relationship of such problems to the extensive literature on generalised linear mixed models.
KeywordsGeneralize Linear Mixed Model Artificial Insemination Sperm Quality Frailty Model Logit Scale
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- [AF95]M. Aitkin and B.J. Francis. GLIM4 macros for nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation with overdispersion and variance component models in the exponential family. The GLIM Newsletter (submitted), 1995.Google Scholar
- [BR92]A.S. Bryke and S.W. Raudenbush. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage publications, Newbury Park, 1992.Google Scholar
- [Cla94]D. Clayton. Generalized linear mixed models. In W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. Spiegelhalter, editors, Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, London, 1994.Google Scholar
- [Hub67]P.J. Huber. The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkely Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, I, pages 221–223. 1967.Google Scholar
- [HW90b]J.P. Hinde and A.T.A. Wood. Binomial variance component models with a non-parametric assumption concerning random effects. In R. Crouchley, editor, Longitudinal data analysis. Avebury, Aldershot, Hants, 1990.Google Scholar
- [LN96]Y. Lee and J.A. Neider. Hierarchical generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58:1, 1964.Google Scholar
- [She64]M.C. Sheps. On the time required for conception. Population Studies, 17:85–97, 1964.Google Scholar
- [SM73]M.C. Sheps and J. A. Menken. Mathematical models of conception and birth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973.Google Scholar