Advertisement

Coronary Angiography Quality Control in the CASS Study

  • J. Ward Kennedy
  • Lloyd D. Fisher
  • Thomas Killip
  • Lloyd D. Fisher

Abstract

The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) was organized in 1973 under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Enrollment of patients began in 1974 and continued through May 1979. CASS consists of a prospective, randomized study to compare the results of medical and surgical treatment in a subset of patients with anatomically proven coronary artery disease, and in a registry of consecutive patients undergoing coronary arteriography in 15 clinical sites in the United States and Canada. At the end of the enrollment period, 24,959 patients were entered into the registry, of which 780 patients were randomized to medical or surgical therapy. Extensive clinical and angiographic data are gathered on each subject at entry and during prolonged follow-up for both randomized and registry patients (1). Patients entered the CASS study when coronary arteriography and left ventriculography were carried out at a participating institution in a patient who was suspected of having coronary heart disease. Patients with other forms of heart disease were not entered, but patients who showed minimal or normal coronary arteries were retained in the registry. Therefore, at the end of enrollment in CASS, about 25,000 patients with carefully defined coronary artery anatomy are available for numerous types of investigations. This extensive data bank represents the largest collection of detailed anatomic information of heart disease in the world. For purposes of this conference, we wish to describe the quality control processes which were developed for entering arteriographic information into the CASS data center and to describe some of the problems related to the performance and interpretation of coronary arteriograms.

Keywords

Coronary Artery Left Anterior Descend Right Coronary Artery Left Main Coronary Artery Coronary Arteriography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    CASS Principal Investigators and their associates (1981) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Coronary Artery Surgery Study, Circulation 63 (Monograph #79)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J, Cameron A, Swaye P, Ryan T, Maynard C, Bourassa M, Gosselin A, Kemp H, Faxon D, Wexler L, Davis K (to be published in Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn) Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wexler LF, Lesperance J, Ryan TJ, Bourassa MG, Fisher LD, Maynard C, Kemp HG, Cameron A, Gosselin AJ, Judkins MP (to be published in Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn) Interobserver variability in interpreting contrast left ventriculograms (CASS)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kemp HG, Davis KB, Judkins MP, Gosselin AJ, Kennedy JW, Cameron A, Swaye PS, Maynard C, Fisher LD (1981) Intrareader variability in the interpretation of coronary arteriograms from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS )Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cameron A, Kemp HG Jr, Fisher LD, Gosselin A, Judkins MP, Kennedy JW, Lesperance J, Mudd JG, Ryan TJ, Silverman JF, Tristani F, Vliestra RE, Wexler LF (to be published) Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination (CASS)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW (1976) Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 53: 627–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, Takaro T (1975) Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation 53: 979–986Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W (1977) Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 55: 324–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanmarco ME, Brooks SH, Blankenhorn DH (1978) Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms. Am Heart J 96: 430–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galbraith JE, Murphy ML, DeSovza N (1978) Coronary angiogram interobserver variability. JAMA 240: 2053–2056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ward Kennedy
  • Lloyd D. Fisher
  • Thomas Killip
  • Lloyd D. Fisher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations